Dumb, de, dumb... yet again the inexusably bad example of aspects of the US educational system rears its ugly head again. It must be that common factor for this gross repetition throughout the USA for this grave and common error.
A republic only denotes the lack of a monarch as head of state and has another representative. In your case, ELECTED, via a DEMOCRATIC election.
No, dude, the USA is a democracy. Like every other democracy in this world, it is a representative democracy. Specifically the USA is a constitionally representative democracy.Canada, the UK, Netherlands, etc, are constitionally represenative monarchiess, where the representive legislating and governing governments, like yours, are also formed with democratic elections.
The common fallacy I find among you lot is a piss poor knowledge and belief that democracy may only be pure votes for all decisions. Not a single state exists nor ever has existed in such a manner. No, the health and extent of a democracy is to what level of the population may vote for plebicides and/or representation. No state has an absolute democracy where all vote for every decision. Limitations upon who may vote have or remain based upon age, sex, race, citizenship, land title, geographic residence, political party membership, incarceration, etc... No state has ever employed pure and unfettered democracy for its people, thereby blackangst1, you look rather piss poor in declaring the USA not to be a democratic state.
Absoluely dividing and conflating with a comparison/contrast between democracy to repulicanism only adds to the shame upon ya...
Every month or so I seem to be giving the same lecture to correct the same glaring ignorance of fundamental politics.
An example of tomato paste and french fries being lacklustre developmental cuisine?