Republicans seem more angry at the Democrats than the terrorists.

[techs]

From what little I have been following about the whole Bengazi affair all I hear is Republican hatred for the Democrats. Where is the outrage against the terrorists?

 

[Nemesis 1]

Thats the Questions the repulsives are asking the demwits you door mat

 

[Matt1970]

Your threads and alot of the ones on this foum say otherwise.

 

[Nintendesert]

From what little I have been following about the whole Bengazi affair all I hear is Republican hatred for the Democrats. Where is the outrage against the terrorists?

Why so much hate over a YouTube shitmovie instead of the terrorists?

 

[Londo_Jowo]

From what little I have been following about the whole Bengazi affair all I hear is Republican hatred for the Democrats. Where is the outrage against the terrorists?

Guess you have selective hearing or you're braindead.

 

[Incorruptible]

Guess you have selective hearing or you're braindead.

This is the only explanation for the op

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Why is this thread about the Republicans instead of the terrorists? How many of your threads in recent memory were about terrorists and not Reps? For that matter how many have not been about reps?

You probably should back out of this one.

 

[WHAMPOM]

Shame on the Democrats for keeping classified intelligence secret! We should let the terrorists have all we know. Brought to you by False Outrage of the Conservative over the (edit: re-election)Black Muslim Nigerian in the White House.

Think I have gone above and beyond? I don't!

 

[Lanyap]

techs seems more angry at the Republicans than the terrorists.

 

[stormkroe]

It's because they believe the Democrats (Obama) are directly responsible for the deaths by denying requests for more security. The outrage then is because while you expect terrorists to kill, you don't expect your own side to just let them. It's like being mad at the farmhand who left the chicken coup door open vs the fox that ate the chickens.
We'll be waiting a while still to see if it's justified feel this way, hopefully the investigation will settle it.

 

[techs]

I though it was because the Republicans cut funding for Embassy security and want to divert everyones attention from it.

Boy its looking like 1998 again. The articles of impeachment are already being drawn up, I imagine.
And there is a Bush who will run for President claiming he will bring morality back to the Presidency.

Deja Vu.

 

[Nemesis 1]

I though it was because the Republicans cut funding for Embassy security and want to divert everyones attention from it.

Already debunked . Nice try

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

I though it was because the Republicans cut funding for Embassy security and want to divert everyones attention from it.

Boy its looking like 1998 again. The articles of impeachment are already being drawn up, I imagine.
And there is a Bush who will run for President claiming he will bring morality back to the Presidency.

Deja Vu.

Ok. Now why do you hate the republicans more than terrorists, or dems exempt?

 

[Nintendesert]

He blames Republicans for cancelling Firefly. He'll never get over that butthurt. Ever.

 

[bozack]

From what little I have been following about the whole Bengazi affair all I hear is Republican hatred for the Democrats. Where is the outrage against the terrorists?

Someone was watching Bill Maher last night it seems.....

To presume there is no angst towards the terrorsts is a silly diversionary tactic..a sad attempt at pushing off blame from the current administration that fucked up big time and now just wants to whitewash over this mess and move on.

There needs to be accountability, people should be fired...and dealing with our own internal problems should be easier and swifter than enacting vengence on the terrorists who attacked us.

 

[glenn1]

Republicans seem more angry at the Democrats than the terrorists

They share the same common enemy. I'm surprised the GOP is even on-board with the wagon terror since they only attack places like NYC that Republicans dislike instead of Opryland or some NASCAR track..

 

[wuliheron]

Republicans are terrorists. Timothy McVeigh, Duh! My enemy's enemy is my best friend, Duh! The fiscal cliff, Duh! They're all ignorant fundamentalist hillbillies intent on the destruction of civilization for fun and profit. After the we get past the fiscal cliff and it becomes clear secession isn't an option how much do you wanna bet Homeland Security has their hands full.

 

[Lemon law]

The republitas are dedicated to the proposition that they more they obstruct the American majority agenda the more Americans will vote GOP. And here we are in 2012 and the republirats are frustrated beyond all rationality.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Why is this thread about the Republicans instead of the terrorists? How many of your threads in recent memory were about terrorists and not Reps? For that matter how many have not been about reps?

You probably should back out of this one.

yes I agree..he should slowly keeping his hands in view back away from the computer......don`t bother turning it off......just reach down and unplug it...

 

[finglobes]

Democrats are just just terrorists domestic wing. Its never been an accident Al Qaeda quotes Dems slandering military, America etc. in their videos. For Dems a terrorist is just a friend they haven't made yet.

 

[boomerang]

After we get to the bottom of who lied, who's covering for who, who's boinking who, who gave what orders and who's ultimately responsible for the torture and deaths of our people, maybe we can explore why it appears we have put seeking out the animals who did this in the name of Islam on the back burner.

Islamic Terrorism: Ignorance Is Not Bliss

The president has reportedly directed his staff to avoid the use of any terminology that could possibly convey the notion that Islamic teachings are in any way connected to the actions of Muslim men like the Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hassan, the Christmas Day bomber Umar Abdulmutallab, and the Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, all of whom engaged in terrorism under Obama's watch.​

Yet the fact remains that the aforementioned terrorists share a common quality: they were all influenced to act by Islam. It is logical to hypothesize that the RPG-wielding hooligans in Benghazi too had Islamic religious mandates in mind when they stormed the American consulate. The Benghazi killers may have had some immediate pretense that triggered the attack, which due to political obfuscation by the Obama administration remains unknown at this time; however, because Islam teaches that enmity between believers and non-believers is perfectly acceptable and that violence against non-believers is a glorious defense of the faith, the Benghazi terrorists would have needed nothing more than a belief in Islamic doctrine to find justification for their attack.​

 

[Matt1970]

Republicans are terrorists. Timothy McVeigh, Duh! My enemy's enemy is my best friend, Duh! The fiscal cliff, Duh! They're all ignorant fundamentalist hillbillies intent on the destruction of civilization for fun and profit. After the we get past the fiscal cliff and it becomes clear secession isn't an option how much do you wanna bet Homeland Security has their hands full.

There ya go. You know of an extremeist that was anti-government. That must mean all republicans are terrorists. I can see why most people ignore you.

 

[Jhhnn]

After we get to the bottom of who lied, who's covering for who, who's boinking who, who gave what orders and who's ultimately responsible for the torture and deaths of our people, maybe we can explore why it appears we have put seeking out the animals who did this in the name of Islam on the back burner.

Islamic Terrorism: Ignorance Is Not Bliss

I love the way you accept even the most flimsy premise as a springboard for conspiracy theory insanity, flimsy premises like "the president has reportedly" said anything.

That's particularly glaring when you quote a source like the American Stinker, whose bias is overwhelming.

 

[boomerang]

I love the way you accept even the most flimsy premise as a springboard for conspiracy theory insanity, flimsy premises like "the president has reportedly" said anything.

That's particularly glaring when you quote a source like the American Stinker, whose bias is overwhelming.

The day may come when you have full control over the media and all stories will be sanitized for presentation to the masses. I expect it will be a glorious day for you when reporting is reduced to reading official releases from central planning. There are a lot of links in the article. It is an article written in the same vein as those on the websites you cherish. The second Obama term is not a turning point for the nation. It is unrealistic to expect that those of us that do not support the leftist point of view will suddenly acquiesce. I hope this does not come as a shock to you.

Dismissing any information, any opinion that differs from the party position is not yet cause for criminal action. Grow up and understand that we are still allowed to have differing opinions and differing points of view here in this nation. It can even lead us to the truth. Don't fear the truth. You can rest assured that if no wrongdoing is found the matter will be dropped and people will move on. It's happened a multitude of times before.

Harry Reid has already resumed his obstructionist patterns. Obama will be protected by his faithful followers. Harry Reid to senators: No Libya panel

 

[Jhhnn]

The day may come when you have full control over the media and all stories will be sanitized for presentation to the masses. I expect it will be a glorious day for you when reporting is reduced to reading official releases from central planning. There are a lot of links in the article. It is an article written in the same vein as those on the websites you cherish. The second Obama term is not a turning point for the nation. It is unrealistic to expect that those of us that do not support the leftist point of view will suddenly acquiesce. I hope this does not come as a shock to you.

Dismissing any information, any opinion that differs from the party position is not yet cause for criminal action. Grow up and understand that we are still allowed to have differing opinions and differing points of view here in this nation. It can even lead us to the truth. Don't fear the truth. You can rest assured that if no wrongdoing is found the matter will be dropped and people will move on. It's happened a multitude of times before.

Harry Reid has already resumed his obstructionist patterns. Obama will be protected by his faithful followers. Harry Reid to senators: No Libya panel

Obfuscational blather based on motivated reasoning- you want to believe so desperately that you do.

Who was it that "reported" what the President supposedly said, anyway? Who says that Liberals want or have full control over the media, other than delusionists like yourself? The media is far from Liberal. The fact that the vast majority of content is controlled & offered up by 5 giant money making conglomerates tells us that.