Republicans: Mouthful of scripture and a heart full of hate

[JEDI]

Describes conservatives to a T

 

[dank69]

Just spitballing solutions here.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

It is such a weird perversion as to what written it makes it hard to believe someone is sincere.
Image sums up well:

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Just spitballing solutions here.

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

 

[dank69]

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

It's legitimate public discourse.

 

[cytg111]

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

Derp

 

[Pens1566]

 

[imported_tajmahal]

It's legitimate public discourse.

Threatening to hit someone in the knee with a baseball bat because you disagree with them is legitimate Anandtech discourse? I don't think it is.

 

[Pens1566]

Threatening to hit someone in the knee with a baseball bat because you disagree with them is legitimate Anandtech discourse? I don't think it is.

If the thing they said that you disagree with was political in nature and they won't answer your calls/letters/emails, then yes, it's political speech.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

If the thing they said that you disagree with was political in nature and they won't answer your calls/letters/emails, then yes, it's political speech.

Sorry to disagree with you, but violence is NOT political speech.

 

[Pens1566]

Sorry to disagree with you, but violence is NOT political speech.

Well, then neither was 1-6 ... glad you finally came around.

 

[ElFenix]

Just spitballing solutions here.

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

It's legitimate public discourse.

Threatening to hit someone in the knee with a baseball bat because you disagree with them is legitimate Anandtech discourse? I don't think it is.

this is beautiful

 

[HomerJS]

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

Tell that to your leader. He has called for violence numerous times

 

[tweaker2]

View attachment 61985

The problem here is that McConnell, at the behest of the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society stuffed the SCOTUS with religious activists beholden to big business interests that is about to shove their politically infected religiosity down the throats of the majority of the nation who disagree with this movement toward theocratic/autocratic fascism.

edit - Reminds me of how Putin has the Russian Orthodox patriarch Kirill in his back pocket.

 

[soulcougher73]

 

[SteveGrabowski]

It is such a weird perversion as to what written it makes it hard to believe someone is sincere.
Image sums up well:

View attachment 61984

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Sorry to disagree with you, but violence is NOT political speech.

Problem is you are like my image above. Faux outrage.
While I don’t believe you truly think political violence is okay. I do know for certain you pick and choose when to condemn it to be taken more seriously you need to speak up more particularly on the dummy bully MAGA guys that have sprouted everywhere.

 

[MrPickins]

It is such a weird perversion as to what written it makes it hard to believe someone is sincere.
Image sums up well:

View attachment 61984

This is spot-on, IMO:

 

[Fanatical Meat]

This is spot-on, IMO:

yup, particularly the Mark 10:25

 

[brycejones]

Not sure if threatening violence is a reasonable response.

Is this really from the same fucker who talked about throwing hand grenades into tunnels occupied by who knows who?

Something about reeping and sowing seems to apply here you sick fuck.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Tell that to your leader. He has called for violence numerous times

I'll let President Biden know next time i talk to him.

 

[dank69]

Threatening to hit someone in the knee with a baseball bat because you disagree with them is legitimate Anandtech discourse? I don't think it is.

I didn't threaten anybody. Just discussing options for dealing with Christofascists. Other options include guillotines.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I didn't threaten anybody. Just discussing options for dealing with Christofascists. Other options include guillotines.

Killing your political opponents? Not a good answer, even here.

 

[dank69]

Killing your political opponents? Not a good answer, even here.

Not all political opponents. Just the fascists. They don't even have to be "Christian."

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Not all political opponents. Just the fascists. They don't even have to be "Christian."

Who is the Judge of whether or not they are "fascists" You ? Do you want to be executioner also? Perhaps you can list what your criteria is for summary execution?