Just to be an irritant, the article is nothing like the headline. Nowhere, other than the previous bans from school shelves, the article talks about restricting sales/loans to minors, not banning outright. Of course, the old "slippery slope" shit and all.....but the headline and first paragraph are lies.
Consider the first two sentences of the article:
1) A book for a young adult audience that the American Library Association described as "the most banned book in the country," is now
under scrutiny for rejection from bookshelves at private stores.
2) A Republican Virginia state delegate has
filed a lawsuit against the author and publisher of "Gender Queer," a book about the nonbinary and asexual experience,
demanding the Barnes & Noble require parental consent before selling the book to minors.
Hmmm...something seems not the same between those two descriptions of what the article is about......
The sentiment posed in the two sentences are not the same. Either it's being banned or sales are age restricted. Seems that it's more age-restrictions at this point.