There's video out there of how he treats her, it's pretty obvious why she wants a divorce. He's just as disgusting and reprehensible as you'd think he is, and he pines for the days in the 40s-50s when you could just treat your wife like that and she generally didn't really have much choice but to take it.She was probably tired of his small dick, or more likely his small mind... and this is defense?
![]()
The Next Front in the GOP's War on Women: No-Fault Divorce
Steven Crowder is part of a growing right-wing chorus calling for an end to modern divorce laws.www.rollingstone.com
Yeah, the only people at fault divorces help are lawyers. Really every state should go to community property and have formulas for how to split everything. My friend just went through a no fault divorce between the two of them they spent 150k and took 14 months to end up at what he originally was going to offer her.Might be religious or sexist motives, or some of both. I do want to point out that fault based divorce burdens men too. It means everyone has to pay for an expensive lawyer, then go into court and accuse their spouse of bad things and endure possibly humiliating cross examination where all their personal stuff is now public, possibly even with their older kids being present. It's antiquated, and it's barbaric. Then again, those two adjectives also bascially describe the modern republican party.
Insecure men with tiny dicks and minds are terrified of women that speak their mind and make their own choices.
Probably relates back to getting laughed at by a woman at some point in their life.
View attachment 81022
I think we should have no fault divorce allowed in every state.
Why are you basing this on effecting women? Wouldn't this change effect both men and women?
You seem a little obsessed with penis size, is there something you'd like to share with the group?Insecure men with tiny dicks and minds are terrified of women that speak their mind and make their own choices.
Probably relates back to getting laughed at by a woman at some point in their life.
View attachment 81022
Because the overwhelming majority of divorces are initiated by women, especially educated women.I think we should have no fault divorce allowed in every state.
Why are you basing this on effecting women? Wouldn't this change effect both men and women?
I also think we should have control over the Chinese buying land in America.
Because the overwhelming majority of divorces are initiated by women, especially educated women.
![]()
Why Do Women Initiate Divorce More Often Than Men?
Are you an unhappily married woman? If so, Fort Lauderdale divorce lawyer Edward J. Jennings, P.A. can help you divorce with ease.www.ejj-law.com
Yes, but it overwhelmingly affects women. A ban on guns affects everyone but it overwhelmingly affects gun owners. If a gun ban legislation is initiated, it's targeting gun owners primarily. If a ban against no fault divorce which is primarily of benefit to women is initiated, it's targeting women.May be, but it still effects both men and women.
I read that two thirds of divorces are started by women as you stated.
![]()
Lawyers for Dads & Fathers Rights Attorneys | Cordell & Cordell
The largest domestic law firm in the country, we're lawyers for dads and fathers' rights attorneys looking to level the playing field in family law courts.cordellcordell.com
Yes, but it overwhelmingly affects women. A ban on guns affects everyone but it overwhelmingly affects gun owners. If a gun ban legislation is initiated, it's targeting gun owners primarily. If a ban against no fault divorce which is primarily of benefit to women is initiated, it's targeting women.
I'm not sure if you've noticed but you've got this habit of trying to find a way to argue with people even when you agree with them by finding these random inane little parts of someone's comment to quip apart, even when you agree with it. It makes it hard to take you seriously when you're trying to be serious.I agree it effects more women than it does men as they file for divorce more than men. But it doesn't deter the fact that it effects both men and women.
Jesus who are you arguing with.
As I said I'm all for no fault divorce.
I'm not sure if you've noticed but you've got this habit of trying to find a way to argue with people even when you agree with them by finding these random inane little parts of someone's comment to quip apart, even when you agree with it. It makes it hard to take you seriously when you're trying to be serious.
Also, the 'who me?' schtick is older than Methuselah.
Nice to see you admit it for once.Okay. Its not you its me...![]()
In a civilized place, that sounds like malpractice.If I had a daughter and lived in the shithole third world state of Texas, I would be relocating solely for the safety of my family.
View attachment 81038
To the women in Texas;In a civilized place, that sounds like malpractice.
In Texas the Government believes that The Constitution only really applies to white male land owners, as is the original intent by the Founding Fathers, and modern day Republicans are firm originalists (unless it contradicts their beliefs, then they just deny history.)To the women in Texas;
the constitution and the freedoms it guarantees do not apply to you.
If I had a daughter and lived in the shithole third world state of Texas, I would be relocating solely for the safety of my family.
View attachment 81038
