I actually find it interesting to know what he's saying, though only in a similar way to being curious as to exactly how the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is written (does it cast Jews as classic Bond villains pushing wildly implausible schemes? Is it well-written? Is it actually funny given it was originally based on a satirical work?), or what the Turner DIaries consist of (probably would find that work too unpleasant to read, though).
Heck, I read the Daily Mail quite often, just because it's useful to know what they are saying and what they are getting worked up about this week (and because it's one of the last non-paywalled newspapers!)
But I can't bring myself to click on this link - I'm not adding to someone's YouTube clicks or having YouTube decide it's a topic I like (the blighters track you by IP adress, not just cookies!).
Anyway, Roger Ebert's review seems to tell me as much as I need to know.
https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/death-of-a-nation-2018
You never cease to surprise me with the extent of your cluelessness. You really think a South Asian can't be very right wing or even racist? Honestly?