- Mar 11, 2010
- 206
- 0
- 76
Hi Everyone, I am trying to find a replacement card for a 6850 (watercooler decided to leak). While I am planning on trying to claim warranty, I wanted to find a new card to purchase just in case.
I have 2 24" monitors that I run at 1920 x 1080, and while I don't play too many games now, I would like to get something that could handle (within the price range), some of the graphic intense games recently released.
While I do know of the different chips/models (6850,5970, GTX 460, etc), the part I'm having problems with is what to look for besides how much memory it comes with. When I look at the details at Newegg, I'm seeing Stream Processors, Core Clock. So while someone might say get a GTX 460, what would be the one to get.
I'm willing to spend between $100-$200 & would like to get the best bang for the buck, with obviously spending the lower end of the price range.
What I would like is to avoid spending more on just slightly higher performance. What I mean is, by using another comparison
19" tv - $150 27" $200 32" $400
500G HD - $75 1TB $100 1.5TB $200
I would pay for the 27" & 1TB because you get more for slightly more, but wouldn't pay for the 32" or 1.5 b/c its not much more for a lot more $$$
Also just a separate question, I used the gpu2011 comparison chart to compare a 6850 to a 5970 & it shows the 5970 beating the 6850. Is this correct?
Thanks
I have 2 24" monitors that I run at 1920 x 1080, and while I don't play too many games now, I would like to get something that could handle (within the price range), some of the graphic intense games recently released.
While I do know of the different chips/models (6850,5970, GTX 460, etc), the part I'm having problems with is what to look for besides how much memory it comes with. When I look at the details at Newegg, I'm seeing Stream Processors, Core Clock. So while someone might say get a GTX 460, what would be the one to get.
I'm willing to spend between $100-$200 & would like to get the best bang for the buck, with obviously spending the lower end of the price range.
What I would like is to avoid spending more on just slightly higher performance. What I mean is, by using another comparison
19" tv - $150 27" $200 32" $400
500G HD - $75 1TB $100 1.5TB $200
I would pay for the 27" & 1TB because you get more for slightly more, but wouldn't pay for the 32" or 1.5 b/c its not much more for a lot more $$$
Also just a separate question, I used the gpu2011 comparison chart to compare a 6850 to a 5970 & it shows the 5970 beating the 6850. Is this correct?
Thanks
Last edited:
