Rephrased and reposted: I pose a conundrum for you ATOT: which would hit the ground first?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LongCoolMother

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2001
5,675
0
0
everybody who took physics in high school knows the typical (and 99% correct) answer is "they will both hit the ground at the same time." In reality, its far more complex... and beyond most of us who dont study physics in particular. Although I seriously doubt that a bullet traveling at 200 mph will be going fast enough to be affected more than a trivial amount by the curvature of the earth.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,407
39
91
Originally posted by: soydios
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Both land at the same time.

Go ask Newton. ;)

/agree

The horizontal components of each bullet's velocity vector doesn't matter. Only the vertical component matters. If the fired bullet is shot at perfect horizontal, both the fired and dropped bullets will hit the ground at the same time, because they have the same vertical velocity vectors.
Hooray for AP Physics. I am such a nerd.

Too bad AP Physics' simplified/perfect world isn't too helpful in solving these real world problems.
Hooray for college engineering physics!
 

nycxandy

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
3,731
0
76
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: nycxandy
Which direction is the bullet being fired from?

In the case of the vehicle, in the direction of travel.

Is the bullet fired from the inside or outside of the vehicle?
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: nycxandy
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: nycxandy
Which direction is the bullet being fired from?

In the case of the vehicle, in the direction of travel.

Is the bullet fired from the inside or outside of the vehicle?

outside

What type of Vehicle is it? A Passenger jet? How many conveyor belts are involved?
 

Calin

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2001
3,112
0
0
Originally posted by: soydios
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Both land at the same time.

Go ask Newton. ;)

/agree

The horizontal components of each bullet's velocity vector doesn't matter. Only the vertical component matters. If the fired bullet is shot at perfect horizontal, both the fired and dropped bullets will hit the ground at the same time, because they have the same vertical velocity vectors.
Hooray for AP Physics. I am such a nerd.

The air resistance is a force that is applied directly against the direction of movement, and its intensity (value) increases with speed (with the squared speed I think, but depend on speed). As a result, the faster bullet will lose more of its vertical "falling" speed because of the increased total velocity.

(but I might be wrong)
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: HomeBrewerDude
a car travelling at 200 mph would certainly not be traveling in a level orientation.

Discounting the curvature of the earth, whyever not? Do cars have a tendency to leap 50 meters in the air after breaking the 200mph barrier?

Depends on the car. C&D drove a stock bodied Firebird to 220MPH at Bonneville and ended up with the car pointed to the sky and about 20 feet off the ground :)
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,354
8,444
126
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: Soccerman06
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
I know SIMPLE physics says they hit at the both time, but in the real world there is this thing called "drag." It becomes a very difficult problem to solve with something like a bullet. As it falls, the direction of the air relative to the bullet changes, changing its drag, lift, and pitching characteristics. It depends on how you drop the bullet, the shape of the bullet, and other factors. However, I guarantee you that the earth's curvature is irrelevant.

<-- Aerospace Engineer

Ah yes, he doesnt say anything about being on earth, we could be on Pluto, where the curvature might play a slight difference.


I made an assumption... that you're on earth. However, I could easily write a quick program that takes both the planet's curvature and drag into account. Even then, with Pluto's diameter at 1400 miles, you still won't notice the effect with a bullet if it travels a few miles.

in the last bullet thread it was determined that while the curvature of the earth may be small, it still affects which bullet hits the ground first. it was the stationary dropped bullet, of course. so, while it may be an even more trivial amount, it will enter into the equation. if the extra 200 mph is not somehow negated then that bullet will hit later, ceteris paribus.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
KillerCharlie, nice to see someone in the aerospace field. Awesome, we need you around here.

:beer: for your knowledge in this thread.


EDIT: Where do you work? (And, please say Lockheed Martin skunkworks, that would be like totally awesome and I would have to worship you).
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: dug777


Is that extra 200mph negated by the increased wind pressure in terms of distance travelled?


Sort of. I'll try to explain it in words, though it'd be easier to explain mathematically.

Let's just say the instant they're dropped, they each fall at about 10 mph. I know this isn't true, but it's the same effect and it illustrates the point.

To find the drag, we have to find the total velocity on the bullets (actually the total velocity squared, since drag is largely a function of V^2). Remember velocity is a vector (has direction) so we square both components. I'll leave it in terms of V^2 since drag is mostly proportional to V^2.


Moving bullet: 200mph forward and 10mph down = 200^2 + 10^2 = 40100 (mph)^2.

Dropped bullet: 10mph down = 10^2 = 100 (mph)^2


Let's just use these numbers as drag, so moving bullet has 40100 units of drag and the dropped bullet has 100 (but in different directions). Now we have to find the component of the drag that is pushing upward on the bullet (the drag slowing its downward fall).


Moving bullet: Drag in vertical direction = 40100 * (sin(angle)) = 40100 * (10/sqrt(40100)) = 2002.5

Dropped bullet: Drag in vertical direction = 100

Therefore, the bullet shot from the moving car will drop more slowly. Its drag force in the vertical direction is generally higher than the bullet that was dropped.

Time for bed... I'm working in the wind tunnel tomorrow :)

But wouldn't any change in upward pressure by the higher velocity of the air particles striking the bottom of the bullet be evened out by the increased downward pressure smacking the top of the bullet, thereby canceling out the effect?

Assumming it's shot straight and there's equal area above and below it.
 

KillerCharlie

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,691
68
91
Originally posted by: BD2003

But wouldn't any change in upward pressure by the higher velocity of the air particles striking the bottom of the bullet be evened out by the increased downward pressure smacking the top of the bullet, thereby canceling out the effect?

Assumming it's shot straight and there's equal area above and below it.

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Typically, the pressure is greater in the direction that faces the wind. You basically can never have the back pressure greater than the front pressure, although they can be close. If the front/back pressure are the same, there will STILL be drag, and quite a bit drag at that. This is called skin friction drag, and is caused by the air dragging along the object's surface.

Also, it is a fallacious idea that air particles "hit" the object. They only hit an object at one singular point near the front called the stagnation point. Thinking of air particles hitting an object and bouncing off is bad thinking. If a particle hits and bounces off, then where would the particle behind it go? Instead, the air particles flow around an object, always in a direction tangent to the surface.



Originally posted by: F22 Raptor
EDIT: Where do you work? (And, please say Lockheed Martin skunkworks, that would be like totally awesome and I would have to worship you).

I work for the other company... and in commercial aircraft :)


 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
Originally posted by: BD2003

But wouldn't any change in upward pressure by the higher velocity of the air particles striking the bottom of the bullet be evened out by the increased downward pressure smacking the top of the bullet, thereby canceling out the effect?

Assumming it's shot straight and there's equal area above and below it.

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Typically, the pressure is greater in the direction that faces the wind. You basically can never have the back pressure greater than the front pressure, although they can be close. If the front/back pressure are the same, there will STILL be drag, and quite a bit drag at that. This is called skin friction drag, and is caused by the air dragging along the object's surface.

Thats cause I'm not sure wtf I'm talking about. My train of thinking is that the only way the bullet that is fired from the moving plane is going to hit the ground later is if there is somehow more upward pressure below the bullet that slows it's descent. How does a greater horizontal speed change that? I'm not questioning your math, I'm just curious as to the reason behind the concept.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0



Originally posted by: F22 Raptor
EDIT: Where do you work? (And, please say Lockheed Martin skunkworks, that would be like totally awesome and I would have to worship you).

I work for the other company... and in commercial aircraft :)


[/quote]

Damn
:(


:p
 
Jan 18, 2001
14,465
1
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: HomeBrewerDude
a car travelling at 200 mph would certainly not be traveling in a level orientation.

Discounting the curvature of the earth, whyever not? Do cars have a tendency to leap 50 meters in the air after breaking the 200mph barrier?

b/c the car would be bouncing along those crappy australian highways....