Right, cops.
Ehh, my apologies. I didn't know troll posts were considered a valid opinion. :hmm:Hardly. Just see the above posts by halfwits like Jhnmhmhnnn.
Nor is there an enumerated right to an abortion. Your point?There is no enumerated right to body armor period. But a proposal to ban it is stupid nonetheless.
What shotgun blows through body armor?![]()
Nor is there an enumerated right to an abortion. Your point?
Has no bearing on enumerated rights. I guess the fact the patent poster made the wrong argument went right over your head?Early-term abortion has been tested. High-tech body armor has not.
"This bill will keep military body armor out of the wrong hands,
The ones you buy at stores will blow through body armor. Shotguns made in shop class might have some issues.What shotgun blows through body armor?![]()
Because they can't get it easily. There may already be a lot of state laws against civilians owning body armor.I really have no problem with people buying body armor. I read a study by the FBI a few years ago that almost no crimes are committed by people wearing body armor.
No, there aren't.Because they can't get it easily. There may already be a lot of state laws against civilians owning body armor.
Because they can't get it easily. There may already be a lot of state laws against civilians owning body armor.
I forgot those laws are about felons or violent felons and not just everybody.No, there aren't.
Number of police killed or shot by civilians wearing military grade body armor?
Number of civilians accidentally killed or shot by police?
WHO needs the body armor???
That certainly is no legitimate reason to ban it.How many civilians are going to wear clunky body armor with optional plates all day every day even when they sleep just in case the police accidentally shoot them just then?
When you put on body armor; it's generally because you're expecting to get shot...
That certainly is no legitimate reason to ban it.
That certainly is no legitimate reason to ban it.
That wasn't the question
