Rep. Harris: "If you're not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin."

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: Corbett
So you dont agree that the Koran states in Jihad that you must kill someone if they will not convert to Islam?

I think that's like saying the Bible states you should kill your son (Genesis 22).

Or for the state to kill the first born son of the opposition (Exodus 11).

#1 God never had him kill his son. Perhaps you should read the chapter over again.

#2 That is not a suggestion for Christians of today to kill their opposition. It was something God was telling them to do at that time at that very moment. There is no timelesss decree in the Bible for Christians to kill unbelievers like there is in the Koran.

 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc

Many Muslims say 'jihad' refers to a personal struggle/effort to do right.

And you think that is the type of jihad that we face today somehow? Somehow you forgot to mention the other meanings o jihad that are obviously being followed more than the one you suggest!
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: Corbett
So you dont agree that the Koran states in Jihad that you must kill someone if they will not convert to Islam?

I think that's like saying the Bible states you should kill your son (Genesis 22).

Or for the state to kill the first born son of the opposition (Exodus 11).

#1 God never had him kill his son. Perhaps you should read the chapter over again.

#2 That is not a suggestion for Christians of today to kill their opposition. It was something God was telling them to do at that time at that very moment.

Maybe YOU need to actually read Genesis 22.

2He said, ?Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering upon one of the mountains of which I shall tell you.?
Uh that sounds like God wanted him to kill his son. You can certainly argue it was a test . . . but what do you think Abraham believed?

7And Isaac said to his father Abraham, ?My father!? And he said, ?Here am I, my son.? He said, ?Behold, the fire and the wood; but where is the lamb for a burnt offering??
Hmm, it's amazing but even in antiquity . . . they practiced 'truthiness.'

10Then Abraham put forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
Granted, Abraham took three days to get this far but it sure does seem like he intends to do the deed. So far we have conspiracy to commit murder (assuming we say God is in on it), assault (binding), attempted assault with intent to kill (knife to neck), and since its post-9/11 I guess we can add a terrorism charge . . . I imagine the kid was a little perturbed by the event.

12He said, ?Do not lay your hand on the lad or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.?

The broader issue being that scripture taken out of context is a talking point . . . Christian, Jew, Muslim, or atheist.
 

imported_michaelpatrick33

Platinum Member
Jun 19, 2004
2,364
0
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
So you dont agree that the Koran states in Jihad that you must kill someone if they will not convert to Islam?


Religious texts are often intepreted by humans to twist their own secular/political power desires.

The Koran does not state that you should kill those who don't convert and in fact has a special place for Jews (and Christians) as fellow Sons and Daughters of Abraham and believers in the One God. "Or the People of the One Book." There is ambivalence to be sure but the respect is there.

Jesus and Mary are revered in Islam but are not raised to deity (and Messiah status).
Christians have converted by the sword for two thousand years in a twisted power struggle and it is wrong by scriptual standard and the same would apply to Muslims who would do the same. The great radical Islamic argument is the taking over of Palestine not the existence of Jews and Christians.

Furthermore, many of these Islamic radicals in interviews can't answer where in the Koran it justifies the killing of innocents other than vague "down with Zionists" and "death to Israel."They have no answer and as such they twist the Koran to their own liking.

If you want another persepective on Islamic thought you might want to read about the Sufi movement of the past (and still alive in areas). This will open your eyes.

Every religion gets twisted to do evil deeds in the name of righteousness. Sad.

From Jihad and Scipture

When Allah permitted [the Muslims] to respond to aggression [by saying] ' Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed [Koran 22:39],' he laid down principles that would guarantee noble human behavior [on the part of the Muslims]. The Muslim responds only to someone who has attacked him, without deviation [as stated in the Koran 2:194]: ' And one who attack s you, attack him in like manner as he attacked you, ' [and also:] ' Fight for the sake of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities [Koran 2:190].'

"It is forbidden to attack noncombatants, even if they belong to the attacking countries. The soul of man is sacred and an attack on it is an attack on all humanity. [This is because it says in Koran 5:32:] 'W hoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew all men.'

"The Prophet [Muhammad] forbade the killing of women and children, saying 'Do not kill a small child' and 'Do not kill descendants and simple laborers,' [i.e.] anyone who hires him to carry out services that are not connected to fighting. Similarly, Islam has forbidden the murder of hostages and [priests] who dedicate themselves to God.

"Islam does not permit the capture or abduction of noncombatants. In the event that [noncombatants] are captured, Allah commanded [Muhammad] his Messenger to treat them well [as it says in Koran 76:8]: 'And they feed, for the love of Allah, the indigent, the orphan, and the captive' [and Muhammad said] 'Treat prisoners well.'

"It is forbidden to hold hostages and threaten the lives of noncombatants because of an action carried out or not carried out by others. [The hostages] are not to blame for this action, and they cannot prevent it. Allah said: ' N o bearer of burden shall bear the burden of another [Koran 6:164],' and the Prophet [Muhammad] said, 'A criminal will be punished only for his own deeds.'

"The Muslim fights oppression in all its forms? Furthermore, the Muslim defends human freedom, regardless of gender, religion, or affiliation, and fights for the sake of this freedom if necessary. [In Koran 4:75 it says:] ' And what reason have you that you should not fight in the cause of Allah and of the weak ?' [The Muslim] is never negligent in resisting the aggressor or occupier: ' And be not slack so as to cry for peace and you have the upper hand [Koran 47:35].'"

Here you have actual words from the Koran. Your statement that the Koran states you should kill all those who don't convert is patently false.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc

Many Muslims say 'jihad' refers to a personal struggle/effort to do right.

And you think that is the type of jihad that we face today somehow? Somehow you forgot to mention the other meanings o jihad that are obviously being followed more than the one you suggest!

I hear we are having a war on terrorism. I wonder what that means? At some point it was a war on Islamic extremism . . . which roughly coincided with the war with radical Islam. And then we got the global war on radical extremism.

I hear we NOW have a war on Islamic fascism.:roll:

Men have wars. We are always fighting over gods, goods, territory . . . sometimes even totally random BS like your friggin' ethnicity. There's nothing special about this conflict . . . except for the vigor with which some of the opposition operates and their horrible focus on noncombatants.

As for the topic, at the end of the day a Christian's primary struggle is to do the right thing despite urges/forces compelling them to do otherwise. It's the same for Muslims. They just have the benefit of those call to prayer thingies every few hours. Every believer practices jihad. The fact that 'evildoers' have an agenda to which they attach jihad is no different from Rovian tactics to attribute various deeds/policies to the Christian ethos . . . shrewd, politically convenient, and morally flawed.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: randym431
The ONLY reason she has gotten as far as she has is republican $$$ and attention......

She "has gotten this far" for a couple of reasons: Her family (and her now) have lots of $$$, and she comes from a political family. I'm pretty sure her father was a big time politition.

Not very good reasons to succeed as a politition, but then- she isn't. Even if she may nave able to run on the familiy's good name, the voters know her now and she's going nowhere fast.

Fern
 

DickFnTracy

Banned
Dec 8, 2005
126
0
0
Originally posted by: straightalker
Tell us DickFnTracy, did the devil make you loose any sleep over CM's cornrow hairstyle as well?

Could you repeat that in coherent English. Is that some kind of ignorant insinuation that I care about someones skin color. Could you be any dumber?

Evidently you can. You posted something from Rense and Cuttingedge
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The only point you have is the one on top of your head. You know what the difference is between Extremist Muslims and Extremist Christians? The Extremist Christians reside in Secular Nations which prevents them from going to violent extremes. I'm positive if there was a Theocratical Christian Nation (like there were in Europe during the 11th to 16th centuries) we'd be seeing the same kind of violent brutality in the name of Christianity that we saw back in the European Middle Ages.
My head is round first of all.

Now, back on topic.

You are missing the REAL difference. The Koran teaches Muslims to kill those who will not convert to Islam. The Bible teaches Christians to love those who wont convert to Christianity.
Did you get your information from here? (Seriouslah!)
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Why do Christians support ANY politician is beyond me.. Uh... Saddam NEVER attacked us so unless Christians and the Neocons are frickin mindreaders then all of our politicians are responsible for murdering 10's of thousands of Iraqis.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Originally posted by: dahunan
Why do Christians support ANY politician is beyond me.. Uh... Saddam NEVER attacked us so unless Christians and the Neocons are frickin mindreaders then all of our politicians are responsible for murdering 10's of thousands of Iraqis.
We all like to support others like ourselves.
 

imported_michaelpatrick33

Platinum Member
Jun 19, 2004
2,364
0
0
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The only point you have is the one on top of your head. You know what the difference is between Extremist Muslims and Extremist Christians? The Extremist Christians reside in Secular Nations which prevents them from going to violent extremes. I'm positive if there was a Theocratical Christian Nation (like there were in Europe during the 11th to 16th centuries) we'd be seeing the same kind of violent brutality in the name of Christianity that we saw back in the European Middle Ages.
My head is round first of all.

Now, back on topic.

You are missing the REAL difference. The Koran teaches Muslims to kill those who will not convert to Islam. The Bible teaches Christians to love those who wont convert to Christianity.
Did you get your information from here? (Seriouslah!)

Didn't you even glance at my post above. The Koran does not "teach" the killing of those won't don't convert to Islam (especially Jews and Christains which the Koran states should be respected as followers of the One God.)

I know the Christians s (really the secular or patriarchal/hierarchal men in power in both church and state) have never used religion to kill or conquer other nations right? :roll: :laugh:

Here is some quote from the Koran for you
From Jihad and Scipture

When Allah permitted [the Muslims] to respond to aggression [by saying] ' Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed [Koran 22:39],' he laid down principles that would guarantee noble human behavior [on the part of the Muslims]. The Muslim responds only to someone who has attacked him, without deviation [as stated in the Koran 2:194]: ' And one who attack s you, attack him in like manner as he attacked you, ' [and also:] ' Fight for the sake of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities [Koran 2:190].'

"It is forbidden to attack noncombatants, even if they belong to the attacking countries. The soul of man is sacred and an attack on it is an attack on all humanity. [This is because it says in Koran 5:32:] 'W hoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew all men.'

"The Prophet [Muhammad] forbade the killing of women and children, saying 'Do not kill a small child' and 'Do not kill descendants and simple laborers,' [i.e.] anyone who hires him to carry out services that are not connected to fighting. Similarly, Islam has forbidden the murder of hostages and [priests] who dedicate themselves to God.

"Islam does not permit the capture or abduction of noncombatants. In the event that [noncombatants] are captured, Allah commanded [Muhammad] his Messenger to treat them well [as it says in Koran 76:8]: 'And they feed, for the love of Allah, the indigent, the orphan, and the captive' [and Muhammad said] 'Treat prisoners well.'

"It is forbidden to hold hostages and threaten the lives of noncombatants because of an action carried out or not carried out by others. [The hostages] are not to blame for this action, and they cannot prevent it. Allah said: ' N o bearer of burden shall bear the burden of another [Koran 6:164],' and the Prophet [Muhammad] said, 'A criminal will be punished only for his own deeds.'

"The Muslim fights oppression in all its forms? Furthermore, the Muslim defends human freedom, regardless of gender, religion, or affiliation, and fights for the sake of this freedom if necessary. [In Koran 4:75 it says:] ' And what reason have you that you should not fight in the cause of Allah and of the weak ?' [The Muslim] is never negligent in resisting the aggressor or occupier: ' And be not slack so as to cry for peace and you have the upper hand [Koran 47:35].'"
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
MichaelPatrick33,
What does the Koran say about evil... and how does it relate to the 'Christian' in say the United States or the Morman or the other 'One God' religions...?

Is it not true that Evil can only do Evil and if by chance it does Good it does so with Evil motive.. and Good can only do Good and if by chance it does Evil it does so with Good motive... and if that is true as is the statement "A house divided against itself can not stand" then the actions of the Western folks when the motive is determined to be Evil with Evil motive denotes the Westerner as Evil... and it ok to rid the world of Evil in the name of Allah..

Is that true?
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
Originally posted by: Corbett

You are missing the REAL difference. The Koran teaches Muslims to kill those who will not convert to Islam. The Bible teaches Christians to love those who wont convert to Christianity.

Luke - Chapter 19 New Testament:

'But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.'

MILLIONS have died over the centuries by zealots with power who found sanctuary and justification with passages like this one.


 

straightalker

Senior member
Dec 21, 2005
515
0
0
Why with 300,000,000 people does the USA have so much constant trouble with placing a majority of true loyal American in power?

If you google '...harris' and various key words together it is possible to spend an entire day sorting through her filth. I just spent an hour and was completely disgusted.

She plays the Christian card like a pro i'll give her that much.

Meanwhile what's in Hilary's hand? She's playing her one biggest ace card in the hole. The fact she could be the first women elected President. So she's out talking about the subject of a women president, but oh not nessessarily her she says. No. Just that maybe now's the time for one. Yeah ok. Sure.

It's a science. Psyops is a science. They hire specialists who study the raw Rovian style tactics needed to win in politics. The result? What happens is real wonderful candidates get blown out of the game by super sophisticated psyops election campaigns.

However. Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul are examples of candidates with constituances (voters) who are blessed enough with the brains to elect a real representative of the people.

I don't know. Florida must be awefully bad to have elected Jeb. New York pretty damned sick to have elected Hilary. Certain areas are plagued with gullible fools. I don't think it's the entire Country. We just don't have the majority yet to turn things around.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: straightalker
Why with 300,000,000 people does the USA have so much constant trouble with placing a majority of true loyal American in power?

I don't know...could it be because most of the politicos are pwned by corporate America (which definitely DON'T have the "majority of Americans" interests in mind).


 

straightalker

Senior member
Dec 21, 2005
515
0
0
She appears to be becoming baggage for the republican based crime syndicates that run the country. Not content with her reward for throwing the 2000 pResidential election, which is her seat in Congress which lasts only two years. She wants more. What exactly could that be. Already a multi millionairess. What does she not already have? Could the bribery game in Florida be the big prize? Is a 6 year Senate seat there a way to become a billionaire at this current stage of our crumbling Republic?
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: KGBMAN
She is leading in the polls.

While you are correct that she is leading in the primary polls, her numbers against Nelson are, thankfully, very poor. She has no chance in November.

Nothing a couple of calls to Diebold tech support can't fix...

 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The only point you have is the one on top of your head. You know what the difference is between Extremist Muslims and Extremist Christians? The Extremist Christians reside in Secular Nations which prevents them from going to violent extremes. I'm positive if there was a Theocratical Christian Nation (like there were in Europe during the 11th to 16th centuries) we'd be seeing the same kind of violent brutality in the name of Christianity that we saw back in the European Middle Ages.

My head is round first of all.

Now, back on topic.

You are missing the REAL difference. The Koran teaches Muslims to kill those who will not convert to Islam. The Bible teaches Christians to love those who wont convert to Christianity.

Have you ever even looked at the koran further than what is on newsmax or foxnews? Or for that matter, have you ever read the bible, which is just as hostile to no-believers?
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: Corbett
So you dont agree that the Koran states in Jihad that you must kill someone if they will not convert to Islam?

I think that's like saying the Bible states you should kill your son (Genesis 22).

Or for the state to kill the first born son of the opposition (Exodus 11).

#1 God never had him kill his son. Perhaps you should read the chapter over again.

#2 That is not a suggestion for Christians of today to kill their opposition. It was something God was telling them to do at that time at that very moment. There is no timelesss decree in the Bible for Christians to kill unbelievers like there is in the Koran.

:roll:
 

KGB

Diamond Member
May 11, 2000
3,042
0
0
Nothing a couple of calls to Diebold tech support can't fix...

I know what you're saying but she is SO far behind, should she win it would immediately get flagged.
 

kingtas

Senior member
Aug 26, 2006
421
0
0
I'd much prefer a humanitarian over a self declared Christian, any day.

I can't stand the moral minority prentending to be saintly while at the same time screwing the Deacon's wife behind his back, or men of the cloth molesting little boys.

 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
They don't care about the sins of bearing false witness, or of coveting, why do they care about the other sins?