Not sure why you didn't think that was already possible? Plus, let me know when Honda designs a car for and markets it based on its ability to kill, which is literally what gun manufacturers have done. Likewise, I'm not sure if you genuinely thought you were making a salient point and not instead highlighting how a car, while capable of killing people, is not inherently designed for such purpose, whereas a gun is, but as usual gun nuts can't seem to understand how much their own arguments highlights the problem and expose both the silliness of their argument as well as highlights perfectly what other people argue.
Look, I get that being a dumbshit is your thing, but are you seriously too damn stupid to know that car manufacturers have actually been on the hook for a lot of deaths that happened in/around their cars? When the auto industry was having serious issues with people being killed, much stricter safety guidelines were passed and enforced. Its baffling how out of touch with reality you surrogate penis stroking dumb sonsabitches are. Its kinda exactly why people have been saying its fucked up that gun manufacturers haven't been held more liable when they've designed and marketed them expressly with intent to kill and often kill far more than any rational person would deem necessary.
FYI, there's some growing discussion about what's causing an uptick in car related fatalities (especially when vehicles hit pedestrians) and that it likely lies in the ever growing size and purchase of larger and larger vehicles (namely pickups and SUVs), that makes both the ability to see and the damage done to pedestrians a major part of the problem. Its not a coincidence that the marketing for them is quite similar to how gun manufacturers pushed their shit either. Do not be surprised if there's some effort to reign that shit in. Then again, much like with guns, there's already laws that would help quite a bit but they're so lackadaisically enforced that they don't do much good. I'm pretty goddamn sure that there's a shitload of lifted trucks that aren't legal where they're being driven for instance.
I want to highlight again, you're comparing a car driving legal highway speeds and marketed as fun as equal to guns built for and marketed for killing? Its like you gun-nutters (at this point I have to assume your penis is small enough to fit in the barrel and you're literally using them as masturbation tools) are intentionally trying to go "let me see if I can make the dumbest argument possible!"