Remember the hiring freeze that wasn't going to affect the military? Team Smoothbrain does it again.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,594
29,221
146
Trump is saving money so that he can fly around on his bigly plane, guard his inbred sons on their international money laundering schemes, guard his imported wife at his gilded tower in the biggliest city, and play his bigly golf at his fugly nightmare of a resort.

1 month in and this guy has completely blown the POTUS vacation and expense budget out of the water. His one month expenses alone are probably greater than every previous president's combined.

I wonder if he is ever going to like, you know, get to work on being POTUS?
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,678
13,432
146
If he leaves then the fat has been effectively trimmed. Consolidate his tasks. Government work is not rocket science.
256357main_Symbols1-xltn.jpg



Now to be fair I believe both George W. and Obama had hiring freezes during their terms, but were fairly short lived.

Federal worker benefits are set by congress and don't change very quickly. So something else happened that started to cause federal benefits to look better than private benefits in the 90's. I wonder what might have happened in the private workplace to worker benefits?

Hmm.....
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,041
26,920
136
No government agency is "required" to spend all of their allocated budget with the exception of specific entitlements defined by law.
Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z
Dec 10, 2005
24,075
6,885
136
https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay
Why do they get to make more than the national average?
Why do you think that is relevant to what they do and how they should be compensated? Do you know the federal work force tends to be fairly well educated and has to live in some pretty high COL areas?
If he leaves then the fat has been effectively trimmed. Consolidate his tasks. Government work is not rocket science.
Your last statement is very telling. If you're not trolling, then you're very ignorant about what the government actually does and what kind of people it needs to do that work.
 

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
326
126
Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.
As I said, specific appropriations are required to be spent. However, if a project comes in under budget or circumstances for whatever reason change, then some funds may not be spent. O&M in particular comes to mind.

It is a normal practice for government agencies at the end of their fiscal year to buy anything imaginable to use up left over funds so they can justify maintaining their budget for the next year. I have been required to do just that.

So I am not disagreeing with you, just pointing out the blanket statement is not completely accurate.
 

mect

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,424
1,636
136
https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay



Why do they get to make more than the national average?

Because on average federal workers have higher levels of education and work in jobs that demand higher salaries than the national average? Of course, we could do a direct job to job comparison, but that would be too intellectually honest. Then you would learn that for federal jobs, yes, they do pay better if you are uneducated, but pay worse if you are highly educated. Of course, even the CBO study has some flaws, as from what I can see it doesn't account for differences in relative percentages of different jobs in each. For example, it make sense that those with only a high school diploma would earn more in the federal government than in the private sector since the federal government would include military. Do you think an army private should make the same as a mcdonalds janitor if they both have a high school diploma?
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
17,708
9,574
136
Because you're comparing every private sector job with government jobs. How many govt. jobs are there for food workers, walmart type greeters and farm hands?

Oh, I don't know, maybe soon:

"Crucifixion? Good. Out of the door, line on the left, one cross each"

:p
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,313
1,214
126
Not far enough, IMHO the military budget should be cut in half. In an age of nuclear weapons, what is the point of a massive standing army? That army will never be used to engage anything other than third world countries.

I would hedge that a bit, currently the military provides one of the few career opportunities for young folks. The savings from the military cuts could be put to career programs for young folks, programs that will pay those folks a similar salary to the military, provide a meaningful skill and do something positive for the country.

Does this amount of spending seem rational?
Defense_Spending_by_Country_2010.png
 

1sikbITCH

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
4,194
574
126
Yet the hiring freeze was actually a good move. Many government workers make an excessive amount of money for the job they do. We need to trim the fat. Sure there will be unintended consequences but in the end it may help reduce the overhead of government.

The hiring freeze was a stupid noob move because he has no idea how to "trim the fat" so he just flings shit at the wall hoping something works. Haha what a dumbass.

That would be like saying the forum has a few assholes that need to be dealt with so we are freezing new signups. Problem solved!
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,075
6,885
136
New Not far enough, IMHO the military budget should be cut in half. In an age of nuclear weapons, what is the point of a massive standing army? That army will never be used to engage anything other than third world countries.
I seem to recall that being the motto at the end of WWII. Then when the Korean War came along, we were caught kind of flat-footed. It's good to have capabilities between nothing and nuclear war.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,766
18,045
146
Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.

Many years ago, I worked at the helpdesk for a state college. There was some budget money left over, and the cio felt it was a good idea to give it back....the budget was that much less the following year. Oh? you don't need that money? Good.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,594
29,221
146
Not far enough, IMHO the military budget should be cut in half. In an age of nuclear weapons, what is the point of a massive standing army? That army will never be used to engage anything other than third world countries.

I would hedge that a bit, currently the military provides one of the few career opportunities for young folks. The savings from the military cuts could be put to career programs for young folks, programs that will pay those folks a similar salary to the military, provide a meaningful skill and do something positive for the country.

Does this amount of spending seem rational?
Defense_Spending_by_Country_2010.png

Now consider that with all of that spending, we still couldn't steamroll our way through Afghanistan and Iraq--as we were assured would happen.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...g-freeze-forces-two-army-bases-to-close-child

Lots of jobs have high turnover. Oops, can't replace that child care worker that moved. Now you're understaffed, reducing efficiency and making life hell for the people that remain.

A hiring freeze is a sledgehammer, not a scalpel. It hurts people needlessly so that the fucking chuds in the administration can look tough on spending without doing the difficult work of deciding what gets cut. Nice job shitheads.
With this, I agree. It's the easy way, and the easy way is very seldom the best way.

It's ironic that Trump touts his business acumen as his main qualification, but he would never do something this stupid with his own businesses. Evidently the person(s) who says "Don't do that, that is stupid" was not brought into the White House.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Now consider that with all of that spending, we still couldn't steamroll our way through Afghanistan and Iraq--as we were assured would happen.
Actually we did steamroll our way through Iraq. Our problem was that we had no idea what to do with it after we owned it. We could have done the same with Afghanistan, but having seen the Soviets do the same, W had enough brains to figure out not to grab that particular tiger's tail. Much better to help the less bad ones drive away the mo' bad ones.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,135
1,594
126
The hiring freeze was a stupid noob move because he has no idea how to "trim the fat" so he just flings shit at the wall hoping something works. Haha what a dumbass.

That would be like saying the forum has a few assholes that need to be dealt with so we are freezing new signups. Problem solved!
Gotta keep the mooselims out.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Actually we did steamroll our way through Iraq. Our problem was that we had no idea what to do with it after we owned it. We could have done the same with Afghanistan, but having seen the Soviets do the same, W had enough brains to figure out not to grab that particular tiger's tail. Much better to help the less bad ones drive away the mo' bad ones.

Which explains the presence of American troops in Afghanistan 16 years after the invasion, obviously.