If he leaves then the fat has been effectively trimmed. Consolidate his tasks. Government work is not rocket science.
Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.No government agency is "required" to spend all of their allocated budget with the exception of specific entitlements defined by law.
Why do you think that is relevant to what they do and how they should be compensated? Do you know the federal work force tends to be fairly well educated and has to live in some pretty high COL areas?https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay
Why do they get to make more than the national average?
Your last statement is very telling. If you're not trolling, then you're very ignorant about what the government actually does and what kind of people it needs to do that work.If he leaves then the fat has been effectively trimmed. Consolidate his tasks. Government work is not rocket science.
As I said, specific appropriations are required to be spent. However, if a project comes in under budget or circumstances for whatever reason change, then some funds may not be spent. O&M in particular comes to mind.Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.
https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay
Why do they get to make more than the national average?
https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay
Why do they get to make more than the national average?
Because you're comparing every private sector job with government jobs. How many govt. jobs are there for food workers, walmart type greeters and farm hands?
Yet the hiring freeze was actually a good move. Many government workers make an excessive amount of money for the job they do. We need to trim the fat. Sure there will be unintended consequences but in the end it may help reduce the overhead of government.
I seem to recall that being the motto at the end of WWII. Then when the Korean War came along, we were caught kind of flat-footed. It's good to have capabilities between nothing and nuclear war.New Not far enough, IMHO the military budget should be cut in half. In an age of nuclear weapons, what is the point of a massive standing army? That army will never be used to engage anything other than third world countries.
Pretty much all agencies are required to spend all their appropriated funds every year. Appropriations laws are laws, not suggestions.
Not far enough, IMHO the military budget should be cut in half. In an age of nuclear weapons, what is the point of a massive standing army? That army will never be used to engage anything other than third world countries.
I would hedge that a bit, currently the military provides one of the few career opportunities for young folks. The savings from the military cuts could be put to career programs for young folks, programs that will pay those folks a similar salary to the military, provide a meaningful skill and do something positive for the country.
Does this amount of spending seem rational?
With this, I agree. It's the easy way, and the easy way is very seldom the best way.http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...g-freeze-forces-two-army-bases-to-close-child
Lots of jobs have high turnover. Oops, can't replace that child care worker that moved. Now you're understaffed, reducing efficiency and making life hell for the people that remain.
A hiring freeze is a sledgehammer, not a scalpel. It hurts people needlessly so that the fucking chuds in the administration can look tough on spending without doing the difficult work of deciding what gets cut. Nice job shitheads.
Actually we did steamroll our way through Iraq. Our problem was that we had no idea what to do with it after we owned it. We could have done the same with Afghanistan, but having seen the Soviets do the same, W had enough brains to figure out not to grab that particular tiger's tail. Much better to help the less bad ones drive away the mo' bad ones.Now consider that with all of that spending, we still couldn't steamroll our way through Afghanistan and Iraq--as we were assured would happen.
Why are they compared to the national average instead of the average for the area in which they work?https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay
Why do they get to make more than the national average?
Gotta keep the mooselims out.The hiring freeze was a stupid noob move because he has no idea how to "trim the fat" so he just flings shit at the wall hoping something works. Haha what a dumbass.
That would be like saying the forum has a few assholes that need to be dealt with so we are freezing new signups. Problem solved!
Actually we did steamroll our way through Iraq. Our problem was that we had no idea what to do with it after we owned it. We could have done the same with Afghanistan, but having seen the Soviets do the same, W had enough brains to figure out not to grab that particular tiger's tail. Much better to help the less bad ones drive away the mo' bad ones.