Remember "blue gene," suppossedly the futures fastest supercomputer?

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Story

IBM Supercomputer Sets New Speed Record

Blue Gene/L sustains a speed of 70.72 trillion floating point operations per second.

By Aaron Ricadela, InformationWeek
Nov. 4, 2004
URL: http://www.informationweek.com...tml?articleID=51202877

An IBM-built supercomputer being assembled for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has attained a record 70.72 trillion computations per second, the Energy Department said Thursday.

IBM's Blue Gene/L system, being assembled in Rochester, Minn., was able to sustain a speed of 70.72 trillion floating point operations per second during tests in the past month running the Linpack benchmarking software. Linpack involves solving a complex series of mathematical equations. IBM has been researching and developing the Blue Gene system as an experiment in building extremely powerful systems that take up less space and consume less power than traditional designs. Livermore next year plans to install a system four times as large as the one that set the record.

The result comes a little more than a month after IBM reported that a smaller version of Blue Gene/L eclipsed the NEC-built Earth Simulator in Japan as the world's fastest computer. The Japanese government's announcement more than two years ago that it had assembled the world's most powerful supercomputer set off a flurry of supercomputing development and interest in the field from Washington, where the technology is considered vital to American scientific and industrial competitiveness. In late September, IBM reported that a Blue Gene/L system achieved a sustained speed of 36 teraflops, edging the Earth Simulator's result of 35.86 teraflops.

Last month, Silicon Graphics said a system at NASA's Ames Research Center in California had attained a sustained speed of 42.7 teraflops. That supercomputer, named Columbia, will be used to study weather and design aircraft.

Improvements to Blue Gene's system software and compilers in the new test let it take advantage of twice as much hardware as the IBM machine that set the record in September, sys Mark Seager, assistant department head for advanced technology at Lawrence Livermore. The new system contains 16,384 computing "nodes," for a total of 32,768 processors. Livermore plans to use the completed supercomputer for a variety of scientific tasks, including safeguarding the nation's stockpile of nuclear weapons.

IBM's report arrives on the eve of a supercomputing industry conference that starts in Pittsburgh this weekend, where a group of computer scientists will release their latest closely watched list of the world's 500 fastest supercomputers. This year's conference will be most notable for "the amount of real scientific results that will be talked about," Seager says. "We're really about changing the way science is done."

Tilak Agerwala, VP of systems for IBM Research, says he doesn't expect to be surprised by "any new major technical announcements" at the conference, called SC04. Instead, he says he expects "a lot more focus on the accessibility and usability of these machines."

Cliff notes: it was suppossed to be the fastest (nothing new) but it is currently 25% done and already bests NEC's current 35.86Tops by almost 200%..

holey crap this thing is going to be fast..:D
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
The new system contains 16,384 computing "nodes," for a total of 32,768 processors. Livermore plans to use the completed supercomputer for a variety of scientific tasks, including safeguarding the nation's stockpile of nuclear weapons.

what are they going to do, put it in a T-1000 chassis?
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
I think the actual computer will be the "safeguarding mechanism" for the weapons in that they will just use it as a bunker for the weapons.
 

element

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,635
0
0
Originally posted by: Evadman
but how fast can it do a Seti WU?

What for? You really think you're gonna find ET with that thing? What a waste of power.
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
Can you pick up chicks with it?

"hey baby, this thing does 70 teraflops."

 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: Evadman
but how fast can it do a Seti WU?

What for? You really think you're gonna find ET with that thing? What a waste of power.

SETI does a lot more than just searching for ET...
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Are you all blind? This supercomputer is the virus! As soon as we give it permission to attack the virus, its all over!
 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
Forgive my naivete.....what exactly do we need 70 trillions ops a second for? I think programmers are just getting lazy :)
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: beer
Forgive my naivete.....what exactly do we need 70 trillions ops a second for? I think programmers are just getting lazy :)

We do more than just play videogames with our computers.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: beer
Forgive my naivete.....what exactly do we need 70 trillions ops a second for? I think programmers are just getting lazy :)

We need enough processing power to handle all those tray icons. :D