Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think this forum could use a lot less personal attacks and name calling and a lot more focusing on the issues. Whether I am a professor or you are a lawyer or Harvey designs computer things doesn't really matter. All that should matter is the quality of our ideas and our ability to state them.
As far as Rummy, I have read a little bit, but certainly not a lot. I am far more interested in history and when I do read it is usually history (WW 2). (One reason I like this forum is that it forces me to dig up facts and figures in order to support my beliefs. Of course when I do that people accuse me of working for some GOP member and having a research staff.)
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think this forum could use a lot less personal attacks and name calling and a lot more focusing on the issues. Whether I am a professor or you are a lawyer or Harvey designs computer things doesn't really matter. All that should matter is the quality of our ideas and our ability to state them.
QFT.
As far as Rummy, I have read a little bit, but certainly not a lot. I am far more interested in history and when I do read it is usually history (WW 2). (One reason I like this forum is that it forces me to dig up facts and figures in order to support my beliefs. Of course when I do that people accuse me of working for some GOP member and having a research staff.)
Don't feel bad. The conspiracy theories here are quite amusing. Hell it has been suggested that I am really George W. Bush! :laugh:
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think this forum could use a lot less personal attacks and name calling and a lot more focusing on the issues. Whether I am a professor or you are a lawyer or Harvey designs computer things doesn't really matter. All that should matter is the quality of our ideas and our ability to state them.
QFT.
As far as Rummy, I have read a little bit, but certainly not a lot. I am far more interested in history and when I do read it is usually history (WW 2). (One reason I like this forum is that it forces me to dig up facts and figures in order to support my beliefs. Of course when I do that people accuse me of working for some GOP member and having a research staff.)
Don't feel bad. The conspiracy theories here are quite amusing. Hell it has been suggested that I am really George W. Bush! :laugh:
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Don, do you think it is possible that someone might look at your liberal views and question whether you were really in the military?
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
Originally posted by: johnnobts
remember, this is the minority leader of the Senate we're talking about, someone who has been spouting "culture of corruption" for over a year. That makes it more signifcant too, no?
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Don, do you think it is possible that someone might look at your liberal views and question whether you were really in the military?
Only an idiot who had never served himself would do so (and no, I am not accusing you of being such a person). There are plenty of liberals in the military. As it happens I've posted pics here of myself in uniform, and in a deployed location. I can easily prove my military status and demonstrate that I hold a bar license in two states.
As for your "professorship," I think that's a different story.
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
You Loose: NOW WITH 100% MORE POP-UPS !
USA Today
Wash Post
NY Times
LA Times
CNN
St. Louis
San Diego
Ft Worth
Seattle
Houston
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Weekly World News
Baker's Dozen - 13 of the most credible news sites in America.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
You Loose: NOW WITH 100% MORE POP-UPS !
USA Today
Wash Post
NY Times
LA Times
CNN
St. Louis
San Diego
Ft Worth
Seattle
Houston
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Weekly World News
Baker's Dozen - 13 of the most credible news sites in America.
Now that he sees he is completely blinded by the propagandistic nonsense he's absorbed from the conservative culture he's steeped in he will now apply his new self understanding and cease forthwith to have any more similarly robotized opinions. He has just discovered that he is Howard Dean, or should I say, himself projected on Dean. His opinions have for a long time been worthless, but a new start is possible now, one based on modesty and humility and deep soul searching, or at least we can hope.
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
You Loose: NOW WITH 100% MORE POP-UPS !
USA Today
Wash Post
NY Times
LA Times
CNN
St. Louis
San Diego
Ft Worth
Seattle
Houston
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Weekly World News
Baker's Dozen - 13 of the most credible news sites in America.
Now that he sees he is completely blinded by the propagandistic nonsense he's absorbed from the conservative culture he's steeped in he will now apply his new self understanding and cease forthwith to have any more similarly robotized opinions. He has just discovered that he is Howard Dean, or should I say, himself projected on Dean. His opinions have for a long time been worthless, but a new start is possible now, one based on modesty and humility and deep soul searching, or at least we can hope.
Nah, new username.
"We have been friends for over 35 years. We didn't need a written agreement between us," Brown said.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: catnap1972
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
*waits for a demand that Reid resign*
*Waits for you guys on the right to produce some lurid and seductive emails*
This is AWESOME!!! It only took you guys six posts to make this all about sex. :laugh:
So is that the new threshhold of corruption the Dems will accept? Gay sex with interns, bad. Illegal land deals... meh. (as long as the deal was made by a Dem of course)
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: johnnobts
remember, this is the minority leader of the Senate we're talking about, someone who has been spouting "culture of corruption" for over a year. That makes it more signifcant too, no?
Yeah, but the Speaker of the House generated twice as much profit from a land deal he failed to disclose to the Ethics Committee, and HIS profits came as a direct result of legislation he helped pass. Regardless, the story was barely a blip on the media radar, although IMO it was a far more serious breach than his inaction regarding Mark Foley, again IMO because it is a harder story to understand. I don't really see how any Republican who was unconcerned about Hastert's deal can feign outrage over what Reid apparently did (though from my perspective both are unacceptable).
One of my law firm's clients is a heavy investor in real estate, and he seems to permanently be holding or borrowing against at least ten loans or notes with his cadre of real-estate buddies. The deals he and his cronies engage in are often complex, involving several different properties in different states, prepared without the assistance of lawyers, and involve eight-figure sums. It seems crazy to me, and it's often tough-to-impossible to pull apart the mare's nests these guys get themselves into, but they all seem happy with the situation, and litigation only flares up once every few years. It sounds to me like the Reid deal may be something along these lines, but at this point I'd say it's too early to tell.
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
You Loose: NOW WITH 100% MORE POP-UPS !
USA Today
Wash Post
NY Times
LA Times
CNN
St. Louis
San Diego
Ft Worth
Seattle
Houston
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Weekly World News
Baker's Dozen - 13 of the most credible news sites in America.
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: johnnobts
this story won't be allowed to get any legs by the MSM, at least not till after the mid-term elections. Surprised USA Today mentioned it, but I will be in "shock and awe" if the Today Show, CBS News, et al make mention of this. Its gonna be all Foley. Foley, Foley Foley.
You Loose: NOW WITH 100% MORE POP-UPS !
USA Today
Wash Post
NY Times
LA Times
CNN
St. Louis
San Diego
Ft Worth
Seattle
Houston
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Weekly World News
Baker's Dozen - 13 of the most credible news sites in America.
And more:
ABC News
CBS News
NBC News
FOX News
Joe's Bar & Grill
Boy, we better hope that the MSM never picks up on a story like this . . .
Originally posted by: Gigantopithecus
Originally posted by: johnnobts
the Foley story has been covered over 150 times now. Not saying its not a big story, but Foley is actually gone. he did resign in shame. How about focusing on Dingy Harry?
How about focusing on prosecuting Foley for solicitation of a minor, lewd & lascivious conduct, and/or child molestation?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
iirc, 16 is the age of consent in DC, and i hadn't heard that any of these guys were under 16. maybe they were outside of DC. and i haven't heard that he actually touched any of these guys, which is probably an element of child molestation.
