- Oct 9, 1999
- 12,513
- 49
- 91
Originally posted by: HJD1
Five four decisions really bother me in that it become very obvious that the law created by their votes is political ideology. I'd like to see 9 mid roaders who go either way with 9 - 0 votes. Old law ought to be settled law. To overturn Roe v Wade is not good law. But, back in the Warren court '64 when equal but separate was found to be unatainable it over turned old settled law... and was good.
Oh well.. I'll get my C-span seat ready.
Originally posted by: Tripleshot
Good luck getting right wing wacko selections past democrat filabusters. Anything less than a centrist will probably not get past commitee. The fringes should not get voice or power over the masses, and fringe obliged Judges will not survive the scrutiny that is in place as a tool to stop foolish, lopsided selections to win. That is what congress is for. I am sure it will work just fine.
Originally posted by: przero
Just 2 more like either Scalia or Thomas will be fine!
Originally posted by: przero
hopefully Bush will appoint someone to the right of Scalia and Thomas!
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Nothing, including the naming of Bush as President by the Supreme Court could be as ugly as Bush trying to fill two Supreme Court vacancies. This WILL be ugly. The Democrats want their pound of flesh, and this will be their means of getting it.
Originally posted by: NightTrain
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Nothing, including the naming of Bush as President by the Supreme Court could be as ugly as Bush trying to fill two Supreme Court vacancies. This WILL be ugly. The Democrats want their pound of flesh, and this will be their means of getting it.
That's always been the case.