• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Reggie Jackson 1969 Chevy Camaro

overst33r

Diamond Member
http://www.edmunds.com/insidel...tures/articleId=121432

One hundred miles into our drive and we're still working to wrap our heads around the idea that this one-of-a-kind 1969 Chevy Camaro makes almost as much horsepower and has been appraised for as much money as a Ferrari Enzo.

Ah, the heck with it. That's why somebody invented insurance, right?

Right foot to the floor. Lift off the accelerator for a moment, strain against the long clutch pedal, yank hard on the Hurst shifter. Second gear. Right foot back on the floor. Rear tires spin like tops. Gain control. Third gear. Tires bark. Wide open. Fourth.

Now we're well past 100 mph and there are still two gears to go. But it's raining again, and the last thing we want to do is pull a Stefan Eriksson ? "No, I swear some guy named Dietrich was driving" ? so we put the Camaro's well-being ahead of our ego and back off.

Reworked by GM Performance Parts (in only a month and a half, no less) into a 641-horsepower monster, this 1969 Chevrolet Camaro, known as the Reggie Jackson Camaro, was the star of the 2006 SEMA show. Now we're driving it for a full day across Michigan during its weeklong appearance on the Hot Rod Power Tour.

The Tour is a yearly traveling road show of mostly cool cars (well, we did see a Pontiac Fiero) that wends its way around the country, stopping each evening at a car show wherein participants might sit on a lawn chair and talk about Holley carburetors at some length. This year it's packing something like 150 million participants, and they all want to know what the Reggie Jackson Camaro feels like.

Raw Power
We tell them all the same thing. Forget about the neck-straining, eye-widening brutal thrust. The best part about the Reggie Camaro is the thunderous wall of sound that accompanies the acceleration.

This Camaro is pure vehicular violence. It's a motor vehicle on a cranked-up 24-hour high. A rolling onslaught of rawness. Just before we had our turn at the wheel, this car had ripped one of its exhaust pipes free of a hanger and took to beating its own floorboard with the length of stainless-steel pipe.

It is, in the best possible sense, an unpleasant thing.

Accurate or not, the audio clip filed under "454-cubic-inch American V8" in our brain is all big, round-sounding burbling and rumbling in the lower registers, but this cast-iron small-block V8 sounds more like it's trying to blast its way out of a concrete bunker.

It's that bunker-buster of an engine that has been the impetus behind building this monster. You see, GM Performance Parts (GMPP) had been looking for a way to publicize its new small-block V8, the LSX. So the company hooked up with baseball hall of fame slugger and muscle-car nut Reggie Jackson for a little cross-promotional car-building.

But don't take the Reggie connection too literally. This car might have Reggie Jackson's name on it, but it is not Reggie Jackson's car. After SEMA, GM bought the car from Jackson for fear that he would sell it to some other collector.

Also, Jackson's lack of involvement allows us to imagine painting over the checkered-flag/Reggie-at-bat logos on this Camaro. They are the one misstep in a subtle visual makeover of the car.

Irons in the Fire
Ah, the engine. Think of the LSX as the hot-rodder's dream Corvette motor and you wouldn't be far from the truth. It's an iron-block version of the LS-series of small blocks that has powered the Corvette since the introduction of the C5 model. Yes, the transition from an aluminum block to an iron one seems like a step backward, but iron has certain advantages if you're after lots of horsepower.

For one, the iron block can be bored out by an engine builder to a displacement of more than 500 cubic inches. This is something that cannot be done with the Corvette Z06's LS7 engine, which is also available through GMPP. The strength of the LSX iron block should also hold up well to supercharged, turbocharged and nitrous-oxide applications. The company says the block, which has been on sale since March 31, can handle up to 2,500 hp. List price is $2,500, but you should be able to find one for about $1,800 or so.

The Reggie Camaro makes due with none of these power-generation devices. The engine displaces a still-monstrous 454 cubic inches and breathes uncompressed air through a Holley 950-cfm carburetor. Inside this engine you'll find a Lunati crankshaft, Mahle pistons and prototype LS7-based heads with an 11.0:1 compression ratio. It also uses a camshaft with a custom-grind profile. GM says it makes 641 hp and 611 pound-feet of torque on plain pump gas.

And the engine looks great. There are no garish shiny bits. It's all serious matte-finish, powder-coated menace. The red valve covers and ceramic-coated headers lend just a bit of gleam to the engine bay.

A crate-motor version of the LSX 454 as seen in this Camaro will go on sale in the spring of 2008 for about $10,000. It'll be rated at 620 hp.

Smells Good; Steers Bad
Other than adjusting to the peculiarities of a carbureted engine, we have nothing but praise for this motor, which feels impossibly strong. The build team bolted it to a Tremec T56 six-speed transmission and the hydraulic clutch from a fourth-generation Camaro. The avalanche of power is sent through a custom aluminum driveshaft to a 12-bolt, limited-slip rear end with 3.91:1 gearing. The car wears serious-looking 18-inch Budnik wheels shod with Goodyear F1 rubber.

GM tells us this car can pull a 10.80-second run in the quarter-mile. Good thing it's been converted to four-wheel disc brakes with big 14-inch rotors and four-piston Brembo calipers.

With going and stopping well taken care of, GM went to work on the way the Camaro handles, always the weakest aspect of any pony car of the past. The front suspension has been replaced by new stuff from Detroit Speed & Engineering, including lightweight tubular control arms and coil-over Konis, while the solid rear axle also gets Koni coil-overs. The result is a '69 Camaro that looks wicked, all hunkered down on its big new wheels. But even the folks at GMPP admit, "You just can't get these things to turn."

Obviously, this beast will be more at home doing a little Saturday-night Mustang-baiting or simple tire-burning than as a daily driver. It is a blunt and specialized tool, but the folks at GMPP tried to actually make this engine-with-a-car-attached somewhat drivable. GM even threw in a few modern touches such as power windows, leather-covered seats from a Chevy Cobalt and Auto Meter gauges with carbon-fiber faces that look great.

Considering we drove it without incident through at least three intense thunderstorm cells during our day-long drive, we must say that they have succeeded. We arrived with the car at the appointed time at a small car show in Kalamazoo, Michigan, without any damage. Our nerves were something of a different story, though.

With a 641-hp radio blaring at all times ? one that has only one volume setting, LOUD! ? and two thin windshield wipers in a losing battle with torrential rain, the 250-mile day was exhilarating but it wasn't exactly stress-free.

Lookey
Slathered in the same red paint that covered the Camaro concept that appeared at the Los Angeles auto show, this Camaro looks exactly like our memory imagines all '69 Camaros should. GM has removed the rocker panel trim and the fake brake vents so the body contours speak more clearly. The way the rear quarters wrap around the deep-dish rear wheels is a study in potential energy and the wheels are so deep you could store old garden hoses inside them.

Call it cross-generational automotive pollination. This reworked '69 Camaro uses the stance, color and minimal adornment aesthetic of the modern interpretation represented by the 2006 Camaro concept. And that concept, which will see production by next year with few visual changes, owes its brawny coolness to the old car.

The new Camaro couldn't possibly be half as intense as this Reggie car and it won't have the outrageous power (at least not from the factory), but it'll still be worth a hard run up through the gears with a heavy foot and a strong arm. Things don't change that much.


2500hp potential!? sheesh...

I always thought up to 6-7 liters was considered a small-block engine. This one is 7.43L, what gives?

I am glad they beefed up the brakes.
 
Well, back in the 70s, the American iron was mostly referred to in cubic inches. Like the 454.

The Pontiac Trans Am was one of the first that I can recall that called the 400 engine a 6.6 liter. Early on, you could get a 455. Also, very few 455SD (super duty) were made. Then, they had a pontiac 400,and a Oldsmobile 403, but both were called a 6.6 liter.
If you ordered the W72 option, one thing you got was a better engine, and the hood scooped was labeled T/A 6.6 to let people know what you had. I had a new 1979 Pontiac Formula, with the small 301, but it could keep up with the 400 engine ones, up until about 3rd gear, then it would fall behind.

The Chevy Corvette with the 454 (1970-1974) was a big block, no one ever called it by a liter size, no one knew what a liter was. But if you did, I guess it would be 7.44 liter

I had a 1973 Pontiac Grand Prix 455, with the Turbo 400 tranny ( best automatic GM ever made, and also used by Rolls Royce) and 455 engine. It could burn rubber all the way through 3rd gear.

Later on, I had 1972 Corvette with the LS5 454. Those were fun days. Almost impossible to change the spark plugs on the passenger side due to cramped engine bay with the AC compressor...

My sleeper car was a 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass with the high compression Rocket 350. Last year for high compression GM cars was 1970.
I had picked the car for 500.00 up from my brother in law whose aunt had died in 1985. It had 13K original miles and original tires on it. A lifter had stuck from sitting so long. I drove it 8 hours back home with it knocking the whole way. My mechanic removed the intake and peered inside. Gave me a call to say the engine was spotless inside. The camshaft was unharmed by the bad lifter. He popped in a 5.00 part, and away I went. Great quality steel back then.
I remember blowing through downtown Austin on I35 at over 120 MPH at 3AM, the speedo was pegged past 120 MPH. No joke. We were nuts.
A Porsche 944 turbo had passed us, taking a look at my grandma car. So I caught up with him, stayed a bit behind, cruising at over 90MPH. An hour later, he took an exit and looked over to see us waving at him in my green and primer painted Cutlass just purring along. He did a double take. He couldn't believe we were right there with him. Fun days, but glad the testosterone is lower now,
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
I always thought up to 6-7 liters was considered a small-block engine. This one is 7.43L, what gives?

I am glad they beefed up the brakes.

Displacement doesn't have anything to do with it. The big block is just physically larger than the small block. So you can easily have a big block with less displacement than a small block, depending on the bore and stroke of each.

 
Originally posted by: GeezerMan
Well, back in the 70s, the American iron was mostly referred to in cubic inches. Like the 454.

The Pontiac Trans Am was one of the first that I can recall that called the 400 engine a 6.6 liter. Early on, you could get a 455. Also, very few 455SD (super duty) were made. Then, they had a pontiac 400,and a Oldsmobile 403, but both were called a 6.6 liter.
If you ordered the W72 option, one thing you got was a better engine, and the hood scooped was labeled T/A 6.6 to let people know what you had. I had a new 1979 Pontiac Formula, with the small 301, but it could keep up with the 400 engine ones, up until about 3rd gear, then it would fall behind.
The 455 was available in the Trans Am until 1976..the last year for any car with that size an engine.
The SD 455 was 73-74. Around 1200 built.

The W72 option was basically a different cam. Engine was the same otherwise.
Correct about the T/A 6.6 sticker, except for 1979. 79 was the last year the 400 was offered, and from the factory, if it said "T/A 6.6", it was a 400 Pontiac. If it said 6.6 Litre, it was the 403 Olds engine.
The Pontiac was the more powerful of the two. The 400's used in 1979 were actually left over from 1978...production of that engine was stopped in 78.
Also, the 400's in 1979 only came in stick cars. No automatics.

And you can forget a 301 car keeping up with the 400 car....unless the person in the 400 car either wasn't trying or couldn't drive a stick. They ran mid 14's in the quarter...a 301 car wouldn't break the 16-second barrier. The 301 had only 150 hp, vs. 220 for the 400.
Sorry, but not a close race there. Best bet in a stoplight drag for the 301 driver is to hope the dude with the 400 is busy picking his nose or changing the radio station when the light turns green.
 
Originally posted by: DougK62
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: mariok2006
I always thought up to 6-7 liters was considered a small-block engine. This one is 7.43L, what gives?

I am glad they beefed up the brakes.</end quote></div>

Displacement doesn't have anything to do with it. The big block is just physically larger than the small block. So you can easily have a big block with less displacement than a small block, depending on the bore and stroke of each.
This is true. The Big Block Chevy was actually made in sizes down to 366 cubic inches.
But that engine physically dwarfed a 400 small block.
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
I always thought up to 6-7 liters was considered a small-block engine. This one is 7.43L, what gives?

"Big Block" and "Small Block" actually refer to the exterior size of the engine block and not to the displacement.

There were 348 cubic inch (~5.6 litre) big blocks and 400 cubic inch small blocks from Chevy; 332 cubic inch (~5.4 litre) big blocks and 400 cubic inch small blocks from Ford.

In general though most classic Small Block engines are under 350 cubic inches and most Big Blocks start at around 390 cubic inches.

Modern engines are exclusively small block designs. I haven't seen a true big block in production cars for years, though you can still buy them as crate engines. Ford has a pretty massive 520 cubic inch (8.52 litre) crate engine available and that's a big block, but they don't put those in production cars.

ZV
 
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: GeezerMan
Well, back in the 70s, the American iron was mostly referred to in cubic inches. Like the 454.

The Pontiac Trans Am was one of the first that I can recall that called the 400 engine a 6.6 liter. Early on, you could get a 455. Also, very few 455SD (super duty) were made. Then, they had a pontiac 400,and a Oldsmobile 403, but both were called a 6.6 liter.
If you ordered the W72 option, one thing you got was a better engine, and the hood scooped was labeled T/A 6.6 to let people know what you had. I had a new 1979 Pontiac Formula, with the small 301, but it could keep up with the 400 engine ones, up until about 3rd gear, then it would fall behind.
</end quote></div>
The 455 was available in the Trans Am until 1976..the last year for any car with that size an engine.
The SD 455 was 73-74. Around 1200 built.

The W72 option was basically a different cam. Engine was the same otherwise.
Correct about the T/A 6.6 sticker, except for 1979. 79 was the last year the 400 was offered, and from the factory, if it said "T/A 6.6", it was a 400 Pontiac. If it said 6.6 Litre, it was the 403 Olds engine.
The Pontiac was the more powerful of the two. The 400's used in 1979 were actually left over from 1978...production of that engine was stopped in 78.
Also, the 400's in 1979 only came in stick cars. No automatics.

And you can forget a 301 car keeping up with the 400 car....unless the person in the 400 car either wasn't trying or couldn't drive a stick. They ran mid 14's in the quarter...a 301 car wouldn't break the 16-second barrier. The 301 had only 150 hp, vs. 220 for the 400.
Sorry, but not a close race there. Best bet in a stoplight drag for the 301 driver is to hope the dude with the 400 is busy picking his nose or changing the radio station when the light turns green.
</end quote></div>

I did not say I could beat a 400, I could not, but it was close from a red light until about 3rd gear. I did have the catalytic converter off of it, that helped a little bit. Oh, and I had a true dual exhaust installed in it.
 
Back
Top