- Dec 23, 2002
- 119
- 0
- 0
Ok first off are the things that I believe are the important factors regarding this situation:
Equpiment being used:
19" NEC Multisync FE950+
Radeon 9700 pro (built by ATI)
P4 3.06 overclocked to 3.7
Asus p4t433 w/ 1gb PC1066
Things that are confusing me:
1. With a setup like this what refresh rate should be used since I dont experience problems at 60hz but my monitor can handle 100hz. I do know that the refresh rate would limit the FPS so im guessing higher refresh = higher fps that can be actually be displayed on monitor. With this in mind I tried the 100 hz setting and all seemed fine playing ut2k (but didn't feel faster) and browsing windows except scrolling waves that could be seen on white backround which drove me crazy. So i took it down a bit and currently have it set for 85 hz but I don't experience any sort of performance boost while gaming. I'm not sure if games should feel smoother/faster or if changing a refresh rate is just an aid for display problems...
2. Nsync is another pain in my butt. Again, I know what it does. Syncs the refresh rate and fps. So if your monitor is set @ 85hz and you play UT2K w/ vsync turned on, your fps will max at 85. Trying this gave the gave a choppy feel so i turned it back off.
What i dont understand is why vsync causes a performance drop. When should vsync be a considerable option? In my mind, the video card and the monitor working together should give a better gaming experience but that surely wasn't the case...
3. I do know that I like high resolutions and AA/ AF turned on with details to the max!!!! I can care less about maximum FPS and 3D mark scores
Thanks
Equpiment being used:
19" NEC Multisync FE950+
Radeon 9700 pro (built by ATI)
P4 3.06 overclocked to 3.7
Asus p4t433 w/ 1gb PC1066
Things that are confusing me:
1. With a setup like this what refresh rate should be used since I dont experience problems at 60hz but my monitor can handle 100hz. I do know that the refresh rate would limit the FPS so im guessing higher refresh = higher fps that can be actually be displayed on monitor. With this in mind I tried the 100 hz setting and all seemed fine playing ut2k (but didn't feel faster) and browsing windows except scrolling waves that could be seen on white backround which drove me crazy. So i took it down a bit and currently have it set for 85 hz but I don't experience any sort of performance boost while gaming. I'm not sure if games should feel smoother/faster or if changing a refresh rate is just an aid for display problems...
2. Nsync is another pain in my butt. Again, I know what it does. Syncs the refresh rate and fps. So if your monitor is set @ 85hz and you play UT2K w/ vsync turned on, your fps will max at 85. Trying this gave the gave a choppy feel so i turned it back off.
What i dont understand is why vsync causes a performance drop. When should vsync be a considerable option? In my mind, the video card and the monitor working together should give a better gaming experience but that surely wasn't the case...
3. I do know that I like high resolutions and AA/ AF turned on with details to the max!!!! I can care less about maximum FPS and 3D mark scores
Thanks
