Reference card vs non for water cooled 770?

Lil'John

Senior member
Dec 28, 2013
301
33
91

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
Don't waste your money on water cooling a 770, grab a 780 instead
 

staryoshi

Member
Jul 10, 2010
25
0
66
I agree with Jay. It's worth the $150-170 premium for the GTX 780 unless you already have all the water components. They have quite a few models with non-reference cooling that are at or under the $500 MSRP.

Also, the DirectCU2 model uses a non-reference PCB that would not be compatible with most water blocks.

To answer your question - stock clocked and factory overclocked models shouldn't clock too differently under water, IMO. Factory overclocked models are sometimes binned, but they are binned to run at their predetermined clocks, not necessarily at the highest clocks possible (With the exception of cards that are meant for extreme overclocking).
 
Last edited:

tweakboy

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2010
9,517
2
81
www.hammiestudios.com
Nah, IMO from my research,,, no need for a 780 unless your resolution is 2k or higher, but for 1080p gaming 770 and a nice OC is whawt I recommend to you, my friend.
 

BrightCandle

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
4,762
0
76
Typically water coolers use reference because its hard to get blocks for the custom ones. But if you can find a full coverage block for a non reference card then that is probably worth it as they tend to beef up the power stages and other tweaks for these OC models.
 

Lil'John

Senior member
Dec 28, 2013
301
33
91
Thanks for the input. I think my ASUS pick was a bad one.

I was thinking of manufacturer overclocked reference cards. Unfortunately, my memory on which is which is a bit off so I won't try another pick:whiste:

I guess my curiosity is whether a water cooled overclocked reference will always do better than a non-reference PCB with customer cooler. Or will the performance be roughly the same but the water cooled has potential to be quieter.