• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Red Cross blocked from delivering aid to Superdome immediately after Hurricane?

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Link

HH: You just broke a pretty big story. I was watching up on the corner television in my studio, and it's headlined that the Red Cross was blocked from delivering supplies to the Superdome, Major Garrett. Tell us what you found out.

MG: Well, the Red Cross, Hugh, had pre-positioned a literal vanguard of trucks with water, food, blankets and hygiene items. They're not really big into medical response items, but those are the three biggies that we saw people at the New Orleans Superdom, and the convention center, needing most accutely. And all of us in America, I think, reasonably asked ourselves, geez. You know, I watch hurricanes all the time. And I see correspondents standing among rubble and refugees and evacuaees. But I always either see that Red Cross or Salvation Army truck nearby. Why don't I see that?

HH: And the answer is?

MG: The answer is the Louisiana Department of Homeland Security, that is the state agency responsible for that state's homeland security, told the Red Cross explicitly, you cannot come.

HH: Now Major Garrett, on what day did they block the delivery? Do you know specifically?

MG: I am told by the Red Cross, immediately after the storm passed.

HH: Okay, so that would be on Monday afternoon.

MG: That would have been Monday or Tuesday. The exact time, the hour, I don't have. But clearly, they had an evacuee situation at the Superdome, and of course, people gravitated to the convention center on an ad hoc basis. They sort of invented that as another place to go, because they couldn't stand the conditions at the Superdome.

HH: Any doubt in the Red Cross' mind that they were ready to go, but they were blocked?

MG: No. Absolutely none. They are absolutely unequivocal on that point.

That's just a damn shame. All those supplies were within reach of those that needed and Louisiana's bureaucracy denied them. Heads will roll indeed....

edit: Video of Fox News report
 
Nice of you to snip off that first paragraph:
On the Fox News Channel just a little while ago, Major Garrett, one of Fox's star reporters, and author of The Enduring Revolution, broke a very disturbing story for those on the left that want to play the blame game regarding the reaction to the Katrina. Here's his interview with Hugh Hewitt moments ago:

HH: Joined now by Major Garrett, correspondent for the Fox News Channel, as well as author of The Enduring Revolution, a best seller earlier this year. We talked about that. Major Garrett, welcome back to the Hugh Hewitt Show.

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Nice of you to snip off that first paragraph:
On the Fox News Channel just a little while ago, Major Garrett, one of Fox's star reporters, and author of The Enduring Revolution, broke a very disturbing story for those on the left that want to play the blame game regarding the reaction to the Katrina. Here's his interview with Hugh Hewitt moments ago:

HH: Joined now by Major Garrett, correspondent for the Fox News Channel, as well as author of The Enduring Revolution, a best seller earlier this year. We talked about that. Major Garrett, welcome back to the Hugh Hewitt Show.

:roll:

And your problem is?
 
Originally posted by: conjur
My problem is he's a partisan hack and likely embellishing things a bit.


I'm sure the "partisan hacks" at the Red Cross are embellishing things too, I see.

Disaster FAQs

Hurricane Katrina: Why is the Red Cross not in New Orleans?


* Acess to New Orleans is controlled by the National Guard and local authorities and while we are in constant contact with them, we simply cannot enter New Orleans against their orders.

* The state Homeland Security Department had requested--and continues to request--that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans following the hurricane. Our presence would keep people from evacuating and encourage others to come into the city.
 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/3/02454/07418
[UPDATED again] LA Homeland Security *confirms* ARC kept out!
by shock
Fri Sep 2nd, 2005 at 21:24:54 PDT

I just called the (Federal) Dept. of Homeland security (202-282-8000) and asked them the following question:
"Is it true what the American Red Cross has reported that they have not been allowed into the city of New Orleans by the DHS since Hurricane Katrina because their 'presence would keep people from evacuating'"?

First, they put me on hold. Then I heard 2 beeps and the click that I assume means they were recording me. Then they asked me my name. (I told them, but now I sort of regret it...) Then they transferred me to Chris at the "Law Enforcement Fusion Desk". I read my question again.

Update [2005-9-3 1:56:56 by shock]: JTML pointed out in a comment that the Red Cross FAQ actually says the "state Homeland Security department", so I just called them too. Read what I found out below. (It's more outrageous than you might think!)

Update [2005-9-3 2:40:52 by shock]: I just updated the title for clarity. (Also note, the Federal DHS would not officially confirm this yet.)

(More.)

* shock's diary :: ::
*

Note: This isn't a verbatim transcript -- I'm paraphrasing. I wasn't smart enough to record the call. But I just called them and this is what happened to the best of my recollection.

[ed. note] This first dialog is still with the federal DHS.
He said he hadn't heard this, so I pointed him to the Red Cross FAQ page link that was posted on this diary. I directed his attention to the second bullet.

He said something to the effect that their policy is trying to help get people out and that this is why they don't want more people coming in. (***)

I said I understood that, but that it didn't make sense to let people starve or die of thirst in the meantime.

He responded that this wasn't happening. That as soon as they pick somebody up, they take them out of there.

I argued with him and told him this wasn't true, that it had been on CNN that people had been being picked up and put down at the convention center where there was no food or water.

He said that all he could tell me was that they were picking people up and taking them out of there.... that their policy was to help the people.

Then I asked who at the DHS was responsible for the policy that kept the Red Cross out.

He said that would have to be Michael Chertoff.

I asked him for his own name and position again and then asked if I could make this public that the DHS was confirming what was on the Red Cross website.

Silence.

After a few seconds I asked if he was there and he said "yeah," and then nothing else.

So I asked my question again and he said "No".

Silence.

I asked why he had said no to me, and rather than answer me, he asked me what I wanted to do with the information.

I said I wanted to email it to my friends and put it on a blog. I think I heard him scoff at this, but I'm not sure.

I asked him again why I couldn't disseminate it and he said he didn't know who I was. Then he asked me directly who I was and why I wanted to know.

I told him that I was a citizen and I wanted to know because I actually gave a fvck about the people of New Orleans. (I was pissed by now because he was patronizing me and he had already lied to me.)

He said they did too.

I said something like "so you won't confirm what the American Red Cross is reporting then?", to which he said something like "no". (It was short.)

I asked why not and he asked me why I wanted to post it.

At this point I lost my temper and went on a little tirade. I said (something like) "because it's a stupid fvcking policy! And people have died because of it. And if Michael Chertoff is responsible, people should be made aware of that. And if you and he think it's a good policy, you should be willing to stand by it and take responsibility for it!" (There was more swearing in there too, but I can't remember exactly what now. I was very pissed. At this point in the conversation, my wife, who was in the room, about fell out of her chair and started motioning to me to shut up.)

After a few seconds of silence, I asked again, so you can't confirm this?

And he said "no".

So I asked who at DHS could.

He told me to call back and talk to the public affairs office on the same number (202-282-8000, although they transferred me to him, so I don't know if that's really his number), but that they wouldn't be back until Tuesday.
I am so pissed right now. If Chertoff really did order this, his head should be served up (Cajun style) on a platter to the mayor of New Orleans.

P.S. When I hung up the phone, the first thing my wife said to me was, "Great. Now you'll be drafted for sure!"

Update [2005-9-3 1:8:41 by shock]: (***) IMO, this is the crucial point of the dialog. I wish I had recorded it so I could tell you exactly what he said. But my recollection is strong that he actually admitted the policy here and was trying to defend it to me.

Update [2005-9-3 1:56:56 by shock]: JTML pointed out in a comment that the Red Cross FAQ actually says the "state Homeland Security department", so I just called them too. (This time I took better notes.) I called the Communications Center for the Louisianna Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness at 225-925-7500. After an operator ("that's above my pay grade") and some other "officer" (at the Operations desk, I think), I ended up at the Media relations desk talking to a really cool and helpful guy, Lt. Kevin Cowan (Public Information Officer) who said I could quote him ("that's my job"). Although I didn't get everything typed word for word (the parts in quotation marks are though), I read him my notes when we were finished, so this is now 'confirmed'. Here goes...
"As part of the disaster plan there's an agreement between the state and the Red Cross for them not to enter."

He didn't know the exact details of the agreement, but he said it had to do with "safety issues" since this is "still a disaster area and still unsafe" with things like "high water, etc."

When I asked specifically about the statement on the Red Cross webpage that said it was because their "presence would keep people from evacuating", he said this wasn't the reason.

Me: "Who on your end made this agreement with the red cross?"

He checked with the Operations desk and came back and told me it was probably a decision between the director of their agency, General Landreneau, the Governor, and Mike Brown at FEMA. He said he didn't know the exact groups in these agencies that worked out the agreement, but "ultimately, they're the ones in charge who sign off on it". He said "it's all a coordinated effort and guidelines are established." The point is they "don't want to put anyone at undue risk". (I was thinking "anyone, who? surely not the people of New Orleans!", but I didn't say anything because he was being so cool.)

Here's the kicker. He then told me that this agreement was for any and all disasters, not just the one in Louisiana!

I asked him how long this policy had been in effect, and he told me, "It's a work in progress; it's always changing."
Wow.

Also, he asked me who I was and if I was with the media. I told him I was going to post the info on a blog (and asked if I could use his name). His reply was that blogs are media. "Hey, that's information out there, isn't it? It's basically the same thing." He also asked me what blog, and he wrote it down.

Anyway, as I said, he was pretty cool..

Update [2005-9-3 4:55:23 by shock]: In a comment below, Orj Ozeppi reports that the Salvation Army is telling people the same thing as the ARC: "if we help, people won't leave." So we have a discrepancy between these relief agencies and LA Homeland Security as to the reason. The relief agencies are consistent. It may be that this policy is just because it's a disaster zone, as the LA Homeland Security guy said, but this question needs to be answered. Was the decision to keep the relief agencies out made to force people to evacuate (and punish those who didn't... perhaps making a lesson of them?) by making conditions intolerable??? If not, why do these relief agencies say so? And if so, WHY THE FVCK ARE THERE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LOCKED IN THE CONVENTION CENTER WITHOUT AID (TONIGHT AS I TYPE THIS) NOT BEING ALLOWED OUT OF NEW ORLEANS???! I can't process this anymore. It's too surreal. Maybe I just need sleep. I pray I wake up tomorrow and this was just a severe nightmare.

So...it would appear that FEMA was probably pressuring the state.
 
Ok, check this out.
Video of Jefferson Parish President Aaron Broussard to Tim Russert on NBC's Meet the Press:

"We had Wal-Mart deliver three trucks of water, trailer trucks of water. FEMA turned them back. They said we didn't need them. This was a week ago. FEMA--we had 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel on a Coast Guard vessel docked in my parish. The Coast Guard said, "Come get the fuel right away." When we got there with our trucks, they got a word. "FEMA says don't give you the fuel." Yesterday--yesterday--FEMA comes in and cuts all of our emergency communication lines. They cut them without notice. Our sheriff, Harry Lee, goes back in, he reconnects the line. He posts armed guards on our line and says, "No one is getting near these lines." Sheriff Harry Lee said that if America--American government would have responded like Wal-Mart has responded, we wouldn't be in this crisis."

- Video -
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕

The point is: is it true? And if it is, what to do about it?
 
Originally posted by: db
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕

The point is: is it true? And if it is, what to do about it?

That's what I was trying to do with my original post but conjur dismissed it as partisan hackery because of Fox News' Major Garrett only to post from the unabashedly partisan Daily Kos.
 
If you read the entire interview you'll see this part too btw:
HH: Of course they are. Now Major Garrett, what about the Louisiana governor's office of Homeland Security. Have they responded to this charge by the Red Cross, which is a blockbuster charge?

MG: I have not been able to reach them yet. But, what they have said consistently is, and what they told the Red Cross, we don't want you to come in there, because we have evacuees that we want to get out. And if you come in, they're more likely to stay. So I want your listeners to follow me here. At the very moment that Ray Nagin, the Mayor of New Orleans was screaming where's the food, where's the water, it was over the overpass, and state officials were saying you can't come in.
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait.... you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕
Are you saying this guy made up an entire fake transcript?


:roll:


BTW, his conversation shows FEMA was involved. I seriously doubt the Gov. would have told the NG to keep the Red Cross out, esp. with the mayor and her having been in contact and knowing the gravity of the situation.


Just more apologist spin.
 
Originally posted by: Hurricane Andrew
Originally posted by: conjur
My problem is he's a partisan hack and likely embellishing things a bit.


I'm sure the "partisan hacks" at the Red Cross are embellishing things too, I see.

Disaster FAQs

Hurricane Katrina: Why is the Red Cross not in New Orleans?


* Acess to New Orleans is controlled by the National Guard and local authorities and while we are in constant contact with them, we simply cannot enter New Orleans against their orders.

* The state Homeland Security Department had requested--and continues to request--that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans following the hurricane. Our presence would keep people from evacuating and encourage others to come into the city.

I notice all the blame Bushpeople keep passing over this post.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait.... you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕
Are you saying this guy made up an entire fake transcript?

Again. Just pointing out the discrepancy in your complaint over an interview with a Fox News correspondent and then coming back and making a post from the unabashedly partisan Daily Kos.

so :roll: back at ya


BTW, his conversation shows FEMA was involved. I seriously doubt the Gov. would have told the NG to keep the Red Cross out, esp. with the mayor and her having been in contact and knowing the gravity of the situation.


Just more apologist spin.

Yes yes. Because every post you might disagree with is nothing but apologist spin.
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait.... you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕
Are you saying this guy made up an entire fake transcript?

Again. Just pointing out the discrepancy in your complaint over an interview with a Fox News correspondent and then coming back and making a post from the unabashedly partisan Daily Kos.

so :roll: back at ya
One is a the embellishment of a partisan hack, who's probably pushing a new book. The other is a transcription, albeit a rough one. of an actual phone call. Don't see the difference? Figures.

BTW, his conversation shows FEMA was involved. I seriously doubt the Gov. would have told the NG to keep the Red Cross out, esp. with the mayor and her having been in contact and knowing the gravity of the situation.


Just more apologist spin.
Yes yes. Because every post you might disagree with is nothing but apologist spin.
There's right and there's wrong. I don't see things as right/left or black/white like you.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Queasy
Wait.... you complain of partisan hacks and then you link to Daily Kos? 😕
Are you saying this guy made up an entire fake transcript?

Again. Just pointing out the discrepancy in your complaint over an interview with a Fox News correspondent and then coming back and making a post from the unabashedly partisan Daily Kos.

so :roll: back at ya
One is a the embellishment of a partisan hack, who's probably pushing a new book. The other is a transcription, albeit a rough one. of an actual phone call. Don't see the difference? Figures.

So you've proven that the reporter embellished his story but there couldn't possibly be any embellishment by the Kos Kiddie?
 
What reporter? There was no reporter in the OP. One party was Hugh Hewitt...Limbaugh-wannabe. The other party was a right-wing hack pushing a book.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
What reporter? There was no reporter in the OP. One party was Hugh Hewitt...Limbaugh-wannabe. The other party was a right-wing hack pushing a book.

Major Garret = Fox News reporter who did not mention his book once during the interview

edit - cut for trying to keep this nice.
 
Originally posted by: glugglug
Is Blanco in charge of the state's Homeland Security department? Isn't she a Repukelican anyways?

Yes, Blanco is in charge of the state's Homeland Security Department. She is a Democrat. She became governor of Louisiana in 2004 after defeating Bobby Jindal who now represents Louisiana as a US Congressman.
 
Nobody will ever get me to belive that FEMA cannot enter a state in a time of a National Crisis without some approval from a Governor.

They were arguing over FEMA wanting to FEDERALIZE LA National Guardsmen..

FEMA took time to TURN AWAY HELP --- but they didn't have the authority to enter the state 😕
 
Back
Top