Hello everyone -
I would love your expertise on a atypical system I'd like to built.
You see, I am not a gamer, so a lot of the suggestions I've read regarding "good systems" don't seem to apply to what I'm after. (For example, the System buyer's guide threat.)
Here's what I'm after in:
1) Fast booting and loading of programs (I know many of you may be rolling your eyes... I know)
2) Quiet
3) Good value/performance ratio (i.e., I don't want the super-fast or the super-quiet, because they're not worth the significant extra expense)
** I'm willing to give up some silence for speed
I don't do anything intensive- no games, no math homework. All I do is web browsing, word processing, email, and on-line poker.
So far, I've already purchased:
1) 19" Spectre DVI LCD, 700:1 contrast and 300 brightness
2) The 74 GB 100,000 RPM raptor with 5ms response
I'm not sure what I need for the following:
1) CPU. I definately want Athlon, because I've read they're just as fast, if not faster, than Intel, but cheaper (criteria #3). But I'm not sure if I'd see a difference between the various AMD 64's.
--- Would I see a difference between a 3000+ versus a 3200+ versus a 3400+?
--- If I go with 3400, I've concluded that I wouldnt see a difference between 754 and 939. Anyone disagree?
--- Why is there a 3400 with 1MB of L2 cache and another 3400 with 512k of L2 cache, and the one with 512k is more expensive? Something to do with "clawhammer" and "newcastle" and that stuff? Anyone think I'd notice a difference by going with the cheaper version?
2) Memory I was originally thinking 2 Gigs of the DDR 400 type. But again, might that be overkill for what I want?
--- Would 2 Gig instead of 1 Gig appreciably change XP booting time or program loading?
--- Would I notice better speed improvements by going with 1 Gig and using the saved $$ for a better CPU?
--- Would I notice a difference if I went with a lower speed RAM like DDR 333 (or whatever the next lowest would be)
3) Motherboard What's the fastest "chipset"? Or maybe a better question, does it matter? Can I get by with a $70 cheapie or would I see performance boost by something higher?
4) Video Card This is where I'm SURE I don't need anything high end - I just want to make sure I get full utilization out of my monitor. I was thinking a cheapie 128MB DVI card from newegg...chaintech I believe is the brand
5) Case I'm thinking Antec Sonata...but only because its advertised as "quiet." I don't think I need anything high end, because I'm not gonna be overworking my CPU to were it would get super hot.
Having already purchase my monitor and hard drive, I'm looking to blow another $750 for the rest.
I know I've asked a lot of questions, so if anyone has any input on any of them, I'd greatly appreciate it!
Thanks!
I would love your expertise on a atypical system I'd like to built.
You see, I am not a gamer, so a lot of the suggestions I've read regarding "good systems" don't seem to apply to what I'm after. (For example, the System buyer's guide threat.)
Here's what I'm after in:
1) Fast booting and loading of programs (I know many of you may be rolling your eyes... I know)
2) Quiet
3) Good value/performance ratio (i.e., I don't want the super-fast or the super-quiet, because they're not worth the significant extra expense)
** I'm willing to give up some silence for speed
I don't do anything intensive- no games, no math homework. All I do is web browsing, word processing, email, and on-line poker.
So far, I've already purchased:
1) 19" Spectre DVI LCD, 700:1 contrast and 300 brightness
2) The 74 GB 100,000 RPM raptor with 5ms response
I'm not sure what I need for the following:
1) CPU. I definately want Athlon, because I've read they're just as fast, if not faster, than Intel, but cheaper (criteria #3). But I'm not sure if I'd see a difference between the various AMD 64's.
--- Would I see a difference between a 3000+ versus a 3200+ versus a 3400+?
--- If I go with 3400, I've concluded that I wouldnt see a difference between 754 and 939. Anyone disagree?
--- Why is there a 3400 with 1MB of L2 cache and another 3400 with 512k of L2 cache, and the one with 512k is more expensive? Something to do with "clawhammer" and "newcastle" and that stuff? Anyone think I'd notice a difference by going with the cheaper version?
2) Memory I was originally thinking 2 Gigs of the DDR 400 type. But again, might that be overkill for what I want?
--- Would 2 Gig instead of 1 Gig appreciably change XP booting time or program loading?
--- Would I notice better speed improvements by going with 1 Gig and using the saved $$ for a better CPU?
--- Would I notice a difference if I went with a lower speed RAM like DDR 333 (or whatever the next lowest would be)
3) Motherboard What's the fastest "chipset"? Or maybe a better question, does it matter? Can I get by with a $70 cheapie or would I see performance boost by something higher?
4) Video Card This is where I'm SURE I don't need anything high end - I just want to make sure I get full utilization out of my monitor. I was thinking a cheapie 128MB DVI card from newegg...chaintech I believe is the brand
5) Case I'm thinking Antec Sonata...but only because its advertised as "quiet." I don't think I need anything high end, because I'm not gonna be overworking my CPU to were it would get super hot.
Having already purchase my monitor and hard drive, I'm looking to blow another $750 for the rest.
I know I've asked a lot of questions, so if anyone has any input on any of them, I'd greatly appreciate it!
Thanks!
