• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

recommendation for new board for 1055T

jojo17

Junior Member
Hi guys,

I got a 1055T CPU last week and I used old gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H but 1055T is not clocking well on this board. The board always comes up saying overclocking has failed.

I was wondering if anyone could recommend new board for this CPU that clocks well. My budget is around $100 to $140.

Thank in advance for your help guys!
 
I'm also looking at the 1055t, and probably going to OC it. Do you guys who have one recommend using an aftermarket CPU fan / heatsink or artic silver, or does it OC just fine using the stock cooling?
 
I'm also looking at the 1055t, and probably going to OC it. Do you guys who have one recommend using an aftermarket CPU fan / heatsink or artic silver, or does it OC just fine using the stock cooling?

Unless where the computer sits is really cool in ambient temperature, get an aftermarket cooler. The stock cooler fan has quite an annoying whine. I went with a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus with MX2 paste.
 
Unless where the computer sits is really cool in ambient temperature, get an aftermarket cooler. The stock cooler fan has quite an annoying whine. I went with a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus with MX2 paste.

Understatement. It will make you want to eat a shotgun(Overstatement).
 
I have been enjoying my MSI 890GX with my 1055t and it is easy OC, able to 4.0Gh,z no problems with flashing BIOS with USB drive, very well made with good heatpipe cooling on mosfets and chipset, uATX, works great, good BIOS and everything is swell.
 
That's the good and wonderful CPU and one of the best out there,really enjoyed with my 1055T CPU and it has many features and works properly,thanks.
 
Unless where the computer sits is really cool in ambient temperature, get an aftermarket cooler. The stock cooler fan has quite an annoying whine. I went with a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus with MX2 paste.

I second that, the stock cooler is hatred, the thermal paste is loathing. Do you really want your new CPU's temperature to be regulated a hatred and loathing sandwich?
 
I have been enjoying my MSI 890GX with my 1055t and it is easy OC, able to 4.0Gh,z no problems with flashing BIOS with USB drive, very well made with good heatpipe cooling on mosfets and chipset, uATX, works great, good BIOS and everything is swell.

3 Confirmed deaths so far, be careful........and what's your mobo revision?

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1524927

http://www.overclockers.com/forums//showthread.php?t=645911

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=248198
 

Eeeep! No problems so far, I am running FSB 243Mhz with coolnquiet and turbo enabled and an OC'ed 4850 at 750/1050 powered by a 650W Antec TruePower. So far, so good.

CPUZ tells me MB revision 00, BIOS version 1.6
 
You don't have to be picky over an AM3 motherboard, they all share the same chipsets, give or take a few revisions and features.

They all perform the same and very few boards in the AMD lineup have overclocking limitations these days. In the past ten years Gigabyte, Asus and MSI have been the leaders in features and price point. You can't go wrong with any of these names. I'd worry more about features. Perhaps a board with USB 3.0, Two PCI-X 16x slots, ect.
 
You don't have to be picky over an AM3 motherboard, they all share the same chipsets, give or take a few revisions and features.

They all perform the same and very few boards in the AMD lineup have overclocking limitations these days. In the past ten years Gigabyte, Asus and MSI have been the leaders in features and price point. You can't go wrong with any of these names. I'd worry more about features. Perhaps a board with USB 3.0, Two PCI-X 16x slots, ect.

There are chipsets, which are the same, and then there's other components such as power circuitry and power circtuitry can vary greatly from one board to the next. MSI has a new implementation called Active Phase Switching circuitry that's supposed to disable PWM's when load doesn't call for them (if activated in BIOS). It's either this new feature or them using cheap components in their power circuitry that can't handle the Thubans. They only implemented this on their latest chipsets, not their older ones.
 
There are chipsets, which are the same, and then there's other components such as power circuitry and power circtuitry can vary greatly from one board to the next. MSI has a new implementation called Active Phase Switching circuitry that's supposed to disable PWM's when load doesn't call for them (if activated in BIOS). It's either this new feature or them using cheap components in their power circuitry that can't handle the Thubans. They only implemented this on their latest chipsets, not their older ones.

Personally, that idea is a horrible one for longevity. More phases means that the power load is shared over more components, which means less of a load on any individual one, which means cooler temps and longer lasting components overall.

MSI's Active Phase Switching, means the opposite of that - higher temps, and shorter lifetimes. Sure, it might save a milliwatt or two of power, but that will definately cost you in the long run.
 
There are chipsets, which are the same, and then there's other components such as power circuitry and power circtuitry can vary greatly from one board to the next. MSI has a new implementation called Active Phase Switching circuitry that's supposed to disable PWM's when load doesn't call for them (if activated in BIOS). It's either this new feature or them using cheap components in their power circuitry that can't handle the Thubans. They only implemented this on their latest chipsets, not their older ones.

Very few Isolated incidents, and no repeats on a BRAND spankin new board. Nonsense. You're a bit bias at best.

But it's not like it would hurt the OP to steer clear, just don't damage the name of a very solid motherboard manufacture while doing so next time.
 
Last edited:
Very few Isolated incidents, and no repeats on a BRAND spankin new board. Nonsense. You're a bit bias at best.

But it's not like it would hurt the OP to steer clear, just don't damage the name of a very solid motherboard manufacture while doing so next time.

MSI 890GXM G65 is a relatively new motherboard, and the three of us that had it blow had brand new boards. If you look at my posts on the other boards as well as the my review on Newegg, you'll see that I asked for people to post what revisions they had if they had my same model to see if improvements have been made.

You'll also see in my posts that I asked if anyone had a motherboard that was killed using a Phenom II X6, not if they had an MSI motherboard that was killed with a Phenom II X6. The majority of the responses were MSI board owners that did have a motherboard die, I didn't make those statistics up. It's still too early to tell, but I think the OP should know about the present data that's been collected and the possibility of there being a problem.

To quote myself:

"Please post your CPU, OC, if turbo was on, voltage, cooling, mobo (w/ revision), and symptoms:

I want to see if this is a Phenom II X6, MSI or some other trend going on (maybe Turbo Core ramping voltage up too high)."

How about doing a little reading before making your judgements. Also, if MSI wants to clear their name, no one's stopping them from coming into a "Formal MSI supported" thread and clearing any misconceptions up.

I really don't think your technical knowledge is all that good with blank statements like this either:

"You don't have to be picky over an AM3 motherboard..........
They all perform the same and very few boards in the AMD lineup have overclocking limitations these days. In the past ten years Gigabyte, Asus and MSI have been the leaders in features and price point. You can't go wrong with any of these names.............. I'd worry more about features. Perhaps a board with USB 3.0, Two PCI-X 16x slots, ect."

I love the part about that you can't go wrong with any of these names. Each of those manufacturers has had bad models in the past (especially the past 10 years). Knowing which particular models are good and which ones are bad or which minimum revisions to get is important. You contribute nothing worthwile to this thread.
 
Last edited:
I'll add that I own an MSI Wind U230, had an MSI GTX260, and am typing from my temporary rig until my RMA arrives, which happens to be an MSI H55 board. Don't call me biased.
 
I've had more RMAs with MSI than any other manufacturer. Coincidence or not, I stay away these days. Go with ASUS or Gigabyte.
 
I'm waiting for Asus to produce an AM3 counterpart for the Rampage II Gene. That board OC's as well as it's full-size bretheren. I really miss that board.
 
Back
Top