Nexus 1 is pretty decent and loved by devs so highly rootable.
true but i'd pick the nexus s over that.
i have an inspire 4g and like the screen
the atrix is dual core but crappy screen
inspire 4g is last year's cpu but big screen
the new samsung is both
that was the opinions on it when it first came out while checking out android central. don't believe the pixel density either since there is a company out there that will do it in software. can't remember the name but a lot of OEM's license their software
after i got my inspire i compared them and my screen looks a lot bigger than the 4" atrix. probably just the way they designed it
It's Pentile and a middling LCD panel. Also, no one actually much cares about density.How can you say the Atrix has a crappy screen while its a higher res than all the other phones and higher pixel density?
People who care about and express opinions on this stuff tend to be those turned off by the (continuing) bootloader lockdown and the lack of custom recovery for the first month and a half of the phone's release. Oh yeah, and the lack of HSUPA on a "4G" phone -- remedied only just now. Also, the FFC was near-useless for the first few months since most of the chat apps didn't play well with Moto's quirky driver setup. (This is *finally* fixed.)Its puzzling why Atrix hating get so much traction as it is arguably the best Android phone on the market.
Its puzzling why Atrix hating gets so much traction as it is arguably the best Android phone on the market.
If you don't like the Blur thing, which I don't, you can either install a pseudo-ROM like Gingerblur or just use an alternative launcher.
It's a toss up between the Atrix and Inspire. I would have to get both in my hands to make a decision. While dual core is nice on paper in reality it isn't being taken advantage of a whole lot right now, the software needs to catch up.
every time i had to wait 18-24 months for the software to use the hardware.
i'll take a big screen with smaller CPU over a smaller screen any day