Recommend me a really *geeky* watch

IeraseU

Senior member
Aug 25, 2004
778
0
71
I was looking at the Casio Pathfinder PRG80YT-1V ( Link ), which has a lot of geeky features like built in digital compass, is solar powered, gives world time in 30 cities , has a built in altimeter, ect.

Yes I fully realize I'm hopelessly geeky for not getting an analog 'bragging rights' designer timepiece like rolex or whatever else is 'in'.....but what can I say, I'm a geek at heart.

What do you guys wear, and what do you recommend?
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,515
6,351
126
woah $160 for a watch that looks like it's for a 6th grader?

no thanks, I'll pass :p
 

yoda291

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2001
5,079
0
0
um...either those big honking digitals with the oversize display or a calculator watch. Those are the official icons of geek watches really.
 

notfred

Lifer
Feb 12, 2001
38,241
4
0
People who go out of thier way to try and look geeky are jsut as bad as people who go out of thier way to try and look ghetto. Congratulations, you're just like this guy.
 

computeerrgghh

Golden Member
Apr 10, 2005
1,121
0
0
I personally think that a "designer" timepiece is very geeky. Have you ever examined the movement? However, I would recommend the Citizen Nighthawk. Its got a nice movement + standard slide rules.
 

MorbidSteve

Member
Jan 2, 2006
157
0
0
You're sure as hell not geeky when you say it as you have. Maybe you're looking for a 'queefy' watch?

Don't use terminology you don't know

Steve
 

Anghang

Platinum Member
Apr 30, 2001
2,853
0
71
very cool watches!...very tempting...wish i could sport one of these in the corporate setting...especially in front of a c-level audience... :(
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Gosh. How do you guys wear geeky watches? I wonder how you dress then...

:confused:

I can't ever see myself walking around with those anymore. I'm past the 6th grade.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: DonVito

I can't say I've ever warmed up to the Accutron aesthetic. If you want a truly sweeping second hand, and a movement that is a technological tour de force, look at the Seiko Spring Drive watches - too bad they start at around $3K.

Bah. Quartz is technically better and is cool from an engineer's perspective: it is the most straightforward and reliable way to solve the problem.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: So

Bah. Quartz is technically better and is cool from an engineer's perspective: it is the most straightforward and reliable way to solve the problem.

Maybe that's why I hate quartz watches! I don't think, FWIW, that quartz is better than Spring Drive, which offers similar accuracy, automatic winding, and never requires a battery (not to mention the incredible engineering and construction that goes into each movement). Seiko brought us the quartz movement, and Spring Drive is another innovation that could probably only have come from Seiko. I still prefer a purely mechanical watch, but these things are really friggin' cool. Read more about it here.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: So

Bah. Quartz is technically better and is cool from an engineer's perspective: it is the most straightforward and reliable way to solve the problem.

Maybe that's why I hate quartz watches! I don't think, FWIW, that quartz is better than Spring Drive, which offers similar accuracy, automatic winding, and never requires a battery (not to mention the incredible engineering and construction that goes into each movement). Seiko brought us the quartz movement, and Spring Drive is another innovation that could probably only have come from Seiko. I still prefer a purely mechanical watch, but these things are really friggin' cool. Read more about it here.

Very, very neat tech, but why not power a quartz watch with an inductive loop and a tiny sliding mass?