- Aug 8, 2008
- 3,892
- 490
- 126
This past weekend I went to Electronic Expo to check out on a deal for a Denon AVR-1708 Receiver at $250, I admit I haven't done too much research on receivers like I've done on TVs but I've heard pretty good things about Denon so I decided to go buy it. When I got there, the salesperson informed me that the newer model, the AVR-1609 would be better and he would even knock off $50 from the $350 original price. I was told that the difference between the 1708 and 1609 is that the 1609 is able to deliver video and audio through HDMI when the 1708 can only deliver video while audio needs to be wired through component cable. Is this true?
Second question is did I rush the purchase, I know those two Denons are probably somewhat low-end Receivers due to their price but is it really worth it to spend like $600 on a better receiver? Or are there other better receivers for the same price as the Denons?
Second question is did I rush the purchase, I know those two Denons are probably somewhat low-end Receivers due to their price but is it really worth it to spend like $600 on a better receiver? Or are there other better receivers for the same price as the Denons?