Originally posted by: callmesteve
Originally posted by: Jawo
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: callmesteve
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: callmesteve
Hrm, this one lens is a little out of my budget but is very very tempting. Trying to see if I can justify a hundred or so extra for it...
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L
Once again, still doing research. Thanks though for your help! I appreciate it tremendously.
i think for the rebel tamron 17-50 is better value (provided you get a sharp copy), constant 2.8
Hey Kalster, sorry if I sound stupid, but what exactly is a "sharp copy"?
tamron's have/had some quality control issues, i know some people have had to exchange multiple copies to get a copy of the tamron 17-50 that was sharp (and didnt have front or back focus issues)
when i used to have 1, it was my first copy and was pretty sharp
Tamron arguably has a better reputation that Sigma (its main 3rd party rival). I ordered a Tamron 17-50 from B&H, and realized it was very soft after I shot a cousin's wedding. :roll: I then went to Penn Camera and tested the three tamron 17-50's they had in stock and picked the best one. I have been greatly enjoying the lens for the past 6 months now without many problems!
Hrm... if I'm reading your post correctly, then I'm a bit disturbed at the fact that all the lenses aren't of the same grade. Do these places let you try out all the lenses before you buy them? Also got me thinking, is it bad for me to buy the lenses online? I say this because it kinda sounds like I might get banged over the head. Glass is a quite expensive investment, I'd hate to get owned. Also, whats a good test for "sharpness"?
Maybe I should create a new thread or something
😛
Thanks again guys, you're input has been invaluable!