Reasons Why Marijuana Users Are Safe Drivers

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
63
91
Some insurance quote provider listed some reasons why weed smokers are safe drivers.

http://www.4autoinsurancequote.org/uncategorized/reasons-why-marijuana-users-are-safe-drivers/

via: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/4/prweb9375729.htm


Driving while intoxicated is a well known way to cause an accident on the road. Although not as common, you can be charged with that offense for more than just drinking alcohol. It also includes anything else that causes impairment, such as drugs (whether they are legal ones or not), including marijuana.marijuana and driving

However, 20 years of study has concluded that marijuana smokers may actually be getting a bad rap and that they may actually have fewer accidents than other drivers. There have been several studies done over the past 20 years and every one of them has revealed that using marijuana actually has a very minor, if any, effect on the ability of a person to drive a car or other vehicle.

Marijuana, Alcohol users Use Products Differently

Research studies showed that if a comparison was done between how drivers who had been drinking alcohol and those who had been using marijuana, it showed that the pot users were in fewer crashes.

Why is this so?

Researchers believe it is because of the way people consume the two products, as alcohol drinkers usually do their drinking out in public and then try to drive home, while pot smokers usually smoke at home and don’t try to drive, meaning fewer are involved in driving accidents in the first place.

Research also shows that while drunk drivers usually drive faster and don’t understand that their driving skills are messed up, the drivers that have been smoking marijuana actually tend to drive slower and stay away from risky behavior.

These and other tests on marijuana smoking and driving were done in different places all over the world, including Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, the United States, and the UK with the following results:

Results of Major Studies on Marijuana and Driving

The research that has been done on this phenomenon of marijuana smoking and driving has shown some interesting results:

Research studies in the Netherlands at the Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research that drivers with blood alcohol rates of .5 percent up to .8 percent had accidents five times more than other drivers, and if it was higher amounts of alcohol, the results were accidents happening up to 15 times more often. But, the marijuana smokers actually showed these drivers posed NO risk at all!
Top 10 Reasons Marijuana Users Are Safer Drivers

When you combine all of the main results of these two decades worth of scientific research studies, the following 10 reasons marijuana drivers are safer than drunk drivers comes out like this:

1. Drivers who had been using marijuana were found to drive slower, according to a 1983 study done by U.S. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). This was seen as a factor in their favor, since drivers who drank alcohol usually drove faster and that is part of the reason they had accidents.

2. Marijuana users were able to drive straight and not have any trouble staying in their own lanes when driving on the highway, according to a NHTSA done in 1993 in the Netherlands. The study determined also that the use of marijuana had very little affect on the person’s overall driving ability.

3. Drivers who had smoked marijuana were shown to be less likely to try to pass other cars and to drive at a consistent speed, according to a University of Adelaide study done in Australia. The study showed no danger unless the drivers had also been drinking alcohol.

4. Drivers high on marijuana were also shown to be less likely to drive in a reckless fashion, according to a study done in 2000 in the UK by the UK Transport Research Lab. The study was done using driver on driving simulators over a period of a month and was actually undertaken to show that pot was a cause for impairment, but instead it showed the opposite and confirmed that these drivers were actually much safer than some of the other drivers on the road.

5. States that allow the legal use of marijuana for medical reasons are noticing less traffic fatalities; for instance, in Colorado and Montana there has been a nine percent drop in traffic fatalities and a five percent drop in beer sales.

The conclusion was that using marijuana actually has helped save lives! Medical marijuana is allowed in 16 states in the U.S.

6. Low doses of marijuana in a person’s system was found by tests in Canada in 2002 to have little effect on a person’s ability to drive a car, and that these drivers were in much fewer car crashes than alcohol drinkers.


7. Most marijuana smokers have fewer crashes because they don’t even drive in the first place and just stay home thus concluded more than one of these tests on pot smoking and driving.

8. Marijuana smokers are thought to be more sober drivers. Traffic information from 13 states where medical marijuana is legal showed that these drivers were actually safer and more careful than many other drivers on the road.

These studies were confirmed by the University of Colorado and the Montana State University when they compared a relationship between legal marijuana use and deaths in traffic accidents in those states. The studies done by a group called the Truth About Cars showed that traffic deaths fell nine percent in states with legal use of medical marijuana.

9. Multiple studies showed that marijuana smokers were less likely to be risk takers than those that use alcohol. The studies showed that the marijuana calmed them down and made them actually pay more attention to their abilities.

All of these tests and research studies showed that while some people think that marijuana is a major cause of traffic problems, in reality it may make the users even safer when they get behind the wheel!

10. Marijuana smoking drivers were shown to drive at prescribed following distances, which made them less likely to cause or have crashes.

Every test seemed to come up with these same results in all of the countries they were done in. Even so, insurance companies will still penalize any driver in an accident that has been shown to have been smoking pot, so this doesn’t give drivers free reign to smoke pot and drive.

So, the bottom line is that while alcohol has been shown in every single incident to have major problems and to have caused countless traffic crashes and fatalities, pot smoking overall has had none of these issues and in fact may make drivers pay more attention, drive slower and straighter and perhaps even stay home so they can’t be in an accident at all!
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
I only drove one time after smoking pot and it was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life. But it's also probably the safest I've ever driven. 5 mph under the limit in the slow lane the entire way; no passing, yielding right of way to pedestrians at crosswalks... It was a longer drive than I wanted to take (about 20 minutes) and it felt like it lasted for 14 hours.

Probably best not to smoke pot and drive as a general rule. I wonder how it compares to being amped up on caffeine though?
 

AFurryReptile

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2006
1,998
1
76
There's a saying that goes: "While a drunk person may run a stop sign, a high person is going to stop and wait for it to turn green."

Driving stoned may be safer than driving drunk, but that doesn't necessarily make it safe.

I can say from my friend's personal experience, that it is easy to get distracted while high. You can completely forget that you are supposed to be driving.
 
Last edited:

God Mode

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2005
2,903
0
71
Throughout my life, saw a lot of drunk accidents but zero pothead accidents.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,767
435
126
The reason for these results is because marijuana stays in the body long after its use, about twenty days or so. I bet most of those people caught driving under the influence of marijuana probably weren't high at the immediate moment, but had used it hours, days or weeks ago.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
Research studies in the Netherlands at the Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research that drivers with blood alcohol rates of .5 percent up to .8 percent had accidents five times more than other drivers, and if it was higher amounts of alcohol, the results were accidents happening up to 15 times more often.
0.5% is waaaay high, close to lethal.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
63
91
And driving slower doesn't equate with driving safer.

No, but speed is one of the most important factors in driving safety. Driving more slowly increases reaction time which increases your ability to avoid an accident. Also, slower speed accidents lead to less serious injuries.
 
Last edited:

crownjules

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2005
4,858
0
76
I like how people are already dismissing it because it's a study on pot. I'm sure an autoinsurance company conducting it over 20 years hasn't already thought of most of these excuses before publishing these controversial findings. Some of them are just silly. Like:

And driving slower doesn't equate with driving safer.

Yeah, driving slower thus affording yourself more time to react and, if you do end up in an accident, less chance of serious injury surely doesn't qualify as "safer driving."
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
1) Saying that stoners drive safer than alkies is a captain obvious.

2) There are some issues with the article such as:
5. States that allow the legal use of marijuana for medical reasons are noticing less traffic fatalities; for instance, in Colorado and Montana there has been a nine percent drop in traffic fatalities and a five percent drop in beer sales.

The conclusion was that using marijuana actually has helped save lives! Medical marijuana is allowed in 16 states in the U.S.

Attributing a 9% drop in fatalities to mj is just logic fail, it could have nothing to do with the fact that medicinal marijuana is present in those states.

3) Driving slower would result in less fatalities than fast overall, however if the stoner is under the minimum limit then they are a threat to others.

4) Suggesting that impairment will make the average driver "safer and more careful" is ridiculous because it contradicts the fact that stoners will drive much slower and as a result pose a threat to others (#3).
8. Marijuana smokers are thought to be more sober drivers. Traffic information from 13 states where medical marijuana is legal showed that these drivers were actually safer and more careful than many other drivers on the road.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,550
30,771
146
I think ti depends on several factors. I am very guilty of doing this throughout my college life, and most times it was like--whatever. Long road trips on long, empty highways it was absolutely no problem.


However, making the mistake of getting blasted then driving home at night--that was never any fun. My best advice is to not blunt and drive.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,550
30,771
146
1) Saying that stoners drive safer than alkies is a captain obvious.

2) There are some issues with the article such as:


Attributing a 9% drop in fatalities to mj is just logic fail, it could have nothing to do with the fact that medicinal marijuana is present in those states.

3) Driving slower would result in less fatalities than fast overall, however if the stoner is under the minimum limit then they are a threat to others.

4) Suggesting that impairment will make the average driver "safer and more careful" is ridiculous because it contradicts the fact that stoners will drive much slower and as a result pose a threat to others (#3).

yeah, I have problems with that, too. Especially number 2, lumping in two likely uncorrelated factors.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
63
91
3) Driving slower would result in less fatalities than fast overall, however if the stoner is under the minimum limit then they are a threat to others.

4) Suggesting that impairment will make the average driver "safer and more careful" is ridiculous because it contradicts the fact that stoners will drive much slower and as a result pose a threat to others (#3).

3). Who said anything about driving under the minimum speed? Stoners usually drive at the speed limit or a few under or over. Jesus christ, you guys will pull anything out of your asses to justify your opinions.

4) And the entire point of the article is to point out that marijuana does not impair one's driving abilities.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
I think ti depends on several factors. I am very guilty of doing this throughout my college life, and most times it was like--whatever. Long road trips on long, empty highways it was absolutely no problem.


However, making the mistake of getting blasted then driving home at night--that was never any fun. My best advice is to not blunt and drive.

I agree. Pot produces major perceptual shifts and slows reaction times. Navigating a car in an empty road is a COMPLETELY different story to navigating through unpredictable traffic and requiring to safely react to changes on the road.

There are also many many levels of being stoned. There's buzzed, and then there's full out blown. To lump them all into one category is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,622
2,880
136
I like how people are already dismissing it because it's a study on pot. I'm sure an autoinsurance company conducting it over 20 years hasn't already thought of most of these excuses before publishing these controversial findings. Some of them are just silly. Like:



Yeah, driving slower thus affording yourself more time to react and, if you do end up in an accident, less chance of serious injury surely doesn't qualify as "safer driving."

Yeah......... that's not the case. This isn't an auto insurer saying this, this is an online quote provider publishing the editorial. Online quote providers are not insurers.

Once you get past the fact that the website has no inherent credibility you get into the problems with the actual editorial like:
"0.5% to 0.8%" BAC
NHTSA study in the Netherlands
One of the conclusions is "smokers drive less so they're safer" which means they didn't attempt to control for incidents per mile or hour driven, which is asinine. A similarly flawed conclusion would be "toddlers drive less than adults so they're safer".
This "study" isn't actually a study but is a bunch of conclusions drawn from a multitude of studies which likely have disparate methodologies and thus cannot be summarily compared.
None of the studies themselves are cited.

In all it's just an opinion editorial from a site with an unknown agenda.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
I remember when I was younger, when Gran Tourismo on Play Station was THE thing to do, I put in my best performed while around racing around under the influence...
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
3). Who said anything about driving under the minimum speed? Stoners usually drive at the speed limit or a few under or over. Jesus christ, you guys will pull anything out of your asses to justify your opinions.

4) And the entire point of the article is to point out that marijuana does not impair one's driving abilities.

If you really believe that it doesn't impair your abilities then more power to you, but a miniscule minority of unimpaired human adults would agree with you.

While anecdotal, I've been in the car with many stoners who drive insanely slower than the speed limit. That and they're completely paranoid about getting busted which was quite humorous.
 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
5
61
Yeah, driving slower thus affording yourself more time to react and, if you do end up in an accident, less chance of serious injury surely doesn't qualify as "safer driving."

Driving slower doesn't increase the reaction times of ANY of the other drivers on the road.

If you're driving slower in the right lane, and the car behind you moves left to pass, the car behind him isn't going to have any additional time to react, based on your slower speed. Quite the opposite, in fact.
 

Murloc

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2008
5,382
65
91
I see enough assholes driving black cars with lights off and at slow speed on the highway already, if they legalized driving under the influence of pot it'd be even worse.
Also you can't measure how high someone is, unlike with alcohol where you can set a limit (0.5, which is completely sober for 99% of people). So it's either ban it, or allow higher than stars people drive. I prefer to ban it. The article says it itself: stoners don't drive after getting high usually, so it's not a problem for them either.
 
Last edited:

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
I agree. Pot produces major perceptual shifts and slows reaction times. Navigating a car in an empty road, and navigating through unpredictable traffic and requiring to safely react to changes on the road is a COMPLETELY different story.

There are also many many levels of being stoned. There's buzzed, and then there's full out blown. To lump them all into one category is ridiculous.

/agreed, editorial did neglect to say what amount of THC was tested for, especially in the Dutch study that quoted BAC levels of ".5 to .8" (lol).
 

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
I see enough assholes driving black cars with lights off and at slow speed already, if they legalized driving under the influence of pot it'd be even worse.
Also you can't measure how high someone is, unlike with alcohol where you can set a limit (0.5, which is completely sober for 99% of people). So it's either ban it, or allow high people drive. I prefer to ban it. The article says it itself: stoners don't drive after getting high usually, so it's not a problem for them either.

I tend to be shitfaced and in twelve different countries at once when I'm at .5.