Barnaby W. Füi
Elite Member
- Aug 14, 2001
- 12,343
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: MGMorden
And here folks, is exactly why American society is going down the toilet. Idiots who would rather hurl around mindless generalizations and stereotypes and try to pass them off as a valid argument rather than actually look at some issues.Originally posted by: jhbball
You're right, Bill Gates is an evil entitiy trying to take over the world, internet, whatever. Microsoft, hp, compaq, are all bad... or something.
hahahahahhaha!
Damn you nerds and your linux. Just quit crying, take off your clokes or whatever, put down the d & d guide for a sec, and just accept that xp is an acceptable os.![]()
You're right. We all are D&D fanatics because we don't want our rights taken away. (damn I wish that this forum software had a rolling eye emoticon . . .)
Originally posted by: jhbball
You're right, Bill Gates is an evil entitiy trying to take over the world, internet, whatever. Microsoft, hp, compaq, are all bad... or something.
hahahahahhaha!
Damn you nerds and your linux. Just quit crying, take off your clokes or whatever, put down the d & d guide for a sec, and just accept that xp is an acceptable os.![]()
Originally posted by: jhbball
Hehe, guess I pissed a few people off
Yes, I was generalizing and stereotyping (sp?) in my last post. But, then again, I also have a sense of humor.
Oh, and yes, I clearly have the largest penis.
lol
There are no real problems with Windows Os's except bugs which by nature are bound to occur. MS and there attempts at ruling over the computers that have their Os on is the problem. Everyone sits around slating the wrong thing. Yes, there are bugs with XP, and yes there are better things avaliable in other Os's, but thats the way it goes. On the whole, I, and most of the population of end users, seem to like Windows. No one can honestly stand up and say it's not good. They may not like it, but Windows is generally (2000 and up) a solid, stable OS.
because I am talking about the superior moral level of linux as a OS, compared with microsoft's stealing and copyrighting other people's work and then once acheiving dominance of the market seeking government legislation garrating there market for the next hundred years that Computers and Microsoft are the only things I care about!!!!
Oh, and for those of you who don't like Windows or bitch about it all the time, go over to Linux (whatever distro) or another Os and be glad that you don't use Windows anymore. Same goes for Windows users, don't knock Linux til you tried it.
Insert Stupid Qoute Here
Edit: The usualNo matter how good of a deal you get on computer components, the price will always drop immediately after the purchase.
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°7
Originally posted by: crisp82
There are no real problems with Windows Os's except bugs which by nature are bound to occur. MS and there attempts at ruling over the computers that have their Os on is the problem. Everyone sits around slating the wrong thing. Yes, there are bugs with XP, and yes there are better things avaliable in other Os's, but thats the way it goes. On the whole, I, and most of the population of end users, seem to like Windows. No one can honestly stand up and say it's not good. They may not like it, but Windows is generally (2000 and up) a solid, stable OS.
Oh, and for those of you who don't like Windows or bitch about it all the time, go over to Linux (whatever distro) or another Os and be glad that you don't use Windows anymore.
Same goes for Windows users, don't knock Linux til you tried it.
Originally posted by: jliechty
Another random rambling from me on this topic...
I very much despise Microsoft's business tactics, and don't really care for the lack of customizability of their OSes (in comparison to UNIX-like ones), but NT, 2000, and XP are a necessary evil in my opinion for some tasks that need to be done. Yes, I could be masochistic and inflict pain upon myself by trying to use various office packages on Linux, but the printing support for that OS just isn't good enough for my picky tastes, and I'm too lazy to try to get it set up right (ghostscript just scares the sh!t out of me, and the commercial nature of CUPS doesn't really appeal to me, either). :Q
Now, please understand that I love to use Linux and BSD, and will use them wherever I need a fast, reliable, and low cost server, programming, or number-crunching system. Maybe someday if I ever get my current PHP project done, I'll get off my lazy ass and learn C++ so I can help with fixing some of the weaker areas of Linux that exist today.![]()
Thats a good philosophy to nave monkey boy![]()
Chill Wizard, maybe you should read my post again. I said I like the os's, not the company, so stop with the bitching. I am fed up with people bitching about Windows OR Linux. All this Windows Fanboi's hate Linux Fanboi's etc is crap. You chose your Os and your opinon and reason are as valid as the next persons.
You can bitch about the OS, not the company.
As for my post being 'off-topic', read the topic fool:
Replying to Thread: Real reason MS's OSes suck
Created On 02/26/2003 2:26 AM by drag
Surely when you talk about the MS OS's being crap, you need reasons.
By the way, dude, if you think that you and "the population of end-users" like windows, then you're sadly mistaken. You can't speak for all the millions of windows users out there, can you? When I set up KDE on my linux box, most people can't even tell the difference between my system andd a windows system (granted that they don't use XP). Personally, I don't care about bugs so much as I care about the company behind the product. My windows boxes are rock solid, but then again so is my linux box. With a little work any OS can be made to run stably (for windows though, just don't mention security.) I shouldn't have to point out some of the idiotic things that Microsoft, as a company, is doing right now to secure their monopoly.
So when I said that MS Os's don't suck, they just have annoying bugs. MS itself sucks.
So, in conclusion, I am pissed off with people like you who hate MS, and therefore hate their software/Os's by default, then come bitch at people like me who hate MS but like Windows.
BTW: Good Quote![]()
The last time I had printing working in Linux was with Redhat about 6 months ago. The text printing was fine, but I do lots of stuff with photos, and the photo quality of my Epson Stylus Color 880 under Linux just wasn't on par with what the Windows drivers produce. As recently as last month, I tried setting up a Debian machine to print to a networked (via SMB) printer, but since I couldn't get it to work (it would print, but only a blank page with some "unable to something-i-can't-remember" text message at the top) after a week, I gave up.Originally posted by: wizardLRU
Printing problems? I've never had any problems printing in any linus distro. This has probably improved over the years, so when was the last time you used linux.Originally posted by: jliechty
Another random rambling from me on this topic...
I very much despise Microsoft's business tactics, and don't really care for the lack of customizability of their OSes (in comparison to UNIX-like ones), but NT, 2000, and XP are a necessary evil in my opinion for some tasks that need to be done. Yes, I could be masochistic and inflict pain upon myself by trying to use various office packages on Linux, but the printing support for that OS just isn't good enough for my picky tastes, and I'm too lazy to try to get it set up right (ghostscript just scares the sh!t out of me, and the commercial nature of CUPS doesn't really appeal to me, either). :Q
Now, please understand that I love to use Linux and BSD, and will use them wherever I need a fast, reliable, and low cost server, programming, or number-crunching system. Maybe someday if I ever get my current PHP project done, I'll get off my lazy ass and learn C++ so I can help with fixing some of the weaker areas of Linux that exist today.![]()
As for office apps. I don't care what any of you say. I've been using openoffice for about 8 months and I have never had any problems (those earlier versions were quite buggy though). Trust me, desktop linux certainly isn't problem free, but its generally stable, pretty neat, and it has come a long way.
If you haven't done so already you should check it out.
The last time I had printing working in Linux was with Redhat about 6 months ago. The text printing was fine, but I do lots of stuff with photos, and the photo quality of my Epson Stylus Color 880 under Linux just wasn't on par with what the Windows drivers produce. As recently as last month, I tried setting up a Debian machine to print to a networked (via SMB) printer, but since I couldn't get it to work (it would print, but only a blank page with some "unable to something-i-can't-remember" text message at the top) after a week, I gave up.![]()
Concerning office apps: I should have been more specific. KWord, OpenOffice, et. al. work fine for word processing and stuff (hey, they're more stable than MS Word!), but neither office suite is all that great in the presentation department...unless they've improved dramatically in the last few months. Actually, their lack of features and performance may be more the blame of the X Window System's limitations, but it still won't (well, wouldn't, last month when I tried) get the job done for me. :frown:
Originally posted by: jliechty
Concerning office apps: I should have been more specific. KWord, OpenOffice, et. al. work fine for word processing and stuff (hey, they're more stable than MS Word!), but neither office suite is all that great in the presentation department...unless they've improved dramatically in the last few months. Actually, their lack of features and performance may be more the blame of the X Window System's limitations, but it still won't (well, wouldn't, last month when I tried) get the job done for me. :frown:
Originally posted by: crisp82
Sorry Wizard, went off on a tangent a bit. Just recieved some not-so-good news. You dual boot Windows/Linux? You mean LILO let you? What Os's?
