Real or Rendered?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

Abix

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
503
0
0
That poll is fixed.

In other news...FAKE because everyone knows that trees dont blur like that.
 
P

Pepsi90919

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,162
1
81
you guys are so pathetic. have you never gone outside of your house before to see what real things look like? :confused:
 
yhelothar

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
wtf real..
You're too easy.
The chromatic abberation in the background is a dead giveaway. I'm pretty sure the truck is real too because it contains the same chromatic abberrations, and the lighting matches also.
 
E

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Haha, okay, I just walked right outside my front door and took that picture, just to see what ridiculous excuses people could make for it being a rendering. I was honestly expecting a rousing chorus of "NO! GRASS UNDERNEATH SNOW ISN'T GREEN" and "RENDERED! NOBODY EVER MADE A BROWN PICKUP TRUCK!"
 
P

pennylane

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2002
6,077
1
0
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Haha, okay, I just walked right outside my front door and took that picture, just to see what ridiculous excuses people could make for it being a rendering. I was honestly expecting a rousing chorus of "NO! GRASS UNDERNEATH SNOW ISN'T GREEN" and "RENDERED! NOBODY EVER MADE A BROWN PICKUP TRUCK!"
Click to expand...

I was thinking of making up some crap like that (see the other threads I've posted in) but I figured people would get sick of it.
 
halik

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
uhhh all the pics have camera info in the jpeg header. They were shot on an Olympus C4000 series camera at iso 100

 
P

ProviaFan

Lifer
Mar 17, 2001
14,993
1
0
Originally posted by: Abix
That poll is fixed.

In other news...FAKE because everyone knows that trees dont blur like that.
Click to expand...
In other news, Abix doesn't have a clue what low-res P&S digicams with cheap fixed lenses do to fine detail in landscape photos. :roll:
Originally posted by: halik
uhhh all the pics have camera info in the jpeg header. They were shot on an Olympus C4000 series camera at iso 100
Click to expand...
I was just going to check for EXIF... darn you're quick. ;)

Edit: third thought: when I first saw that, I thought "why the fvck would anyone go to the work to generate a crappy scene like this in a 3D design program?". :eek:
 
E

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
You guys are quick with the EXIF. But the second picture is TEH RENDERED. (Well, sort of. It was a color correction to what I actually saw from what the camera adjusted to because of user error (I completely forgot I was in auto mode)

Edit: OH CRAP, no it's not, I linked the wrong picture, hahaha. Okay, that one's real.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom