Originally posted by: faZZter
You'd probably save more money by paying off your loan quicker than you'd make by putting the extra money in other investments.
Besides, wouldn't you feel more secure if you owned your home? What if you lose your job or something? The sooner you own it the more secure you'd feel.
Actually, you'd save less money by paying off your loan quicker. If you put your money in a mutual fund, like fidelity health funds, you'd get 10-14% return over 10 years. Put that money in your home and you get 0% return over 10 years. (Note: the equity in your home will rise whether your home is paid off or not).
If you lose your job after 10 years, your bank will not let your refinance your home so you'd have to sell to get your money out. If you had that money in a mutual fund and you lost your job, you'd be able to use the money to make your monthly payment till you find another job. I'd feel more secured with my money in the mutual fund where its liquidable.
By paying your home off in 15 years instead of 30, lets say at 6% interest rate, you're saying you can't invest that money over the next 15 years and make a return greater than 6%. Also, paying principle doesn't result in tax breaks so if you consider the tax break when you make a mortgage payment, the 6% looks more like 3% or less after 15 years of inflation.
I don't know why people don't think about these things, but I guess people take the easiest route eventhough its not the best one.