• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ready For The Apocalypse?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Helpful hint: my post was not serious. 🙂
Click to expand...

I figured, but what I said was the truth. Once the Apocalypse didn't hit during the year 2000, all of these groups came up with evidence of why the calendar was actually six or seven years off. Of course, they never mentioned it BEFORE 2000. :-/
Click to expand...

Actually isn't the calendar several years off in the OTHER direction? Herod died in 4BC, which means that Jesus had to be born sometime before that date. This means that the 2000th anniversary of Christ's birth would wind up falling sometime in the mid-90's.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top