• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Reading material on the basics of circuitry

foges

Senior member
My physics exams are coming up and circuits is part of it, i get some of it (like calculate the resistance of these resistors in parallel), but when wattage and parallel combined with series comes i get confused. So if anyone can recomend a website that would be awesome. 😀
 
well i was going over this past examination paper (page 8, see below) and i get the very first part (why the "students" explanation is incorrect), but the rest i dont understand. For example why would the brightness of bulb A and C not stay the same and the brightness in bulb B dim. I also calculated the wattage over bulb B to be 1.5, not 1.08. If anyone could walk me through that 😀

http://rapidshare.com/files/25680685/Physics_HL_-_Nov_2000_-_P2.pdf.html
 
8a: electrons don't matter; e-fields matter.
8b: 3 series equal resistors... they'll obviously all be equal
8c - this depends on the actual behavior of the bulbs. if they're acting like resistors, A and C will get brighter, because the resistance of all 4 bulbs together is lower than the resistance of the 3 in the initial setup. Since the resistance is lower, the current is higher, and all the current is flowing through A and C. The current won't double, and since its' split between B and D, B has to get dimmer. Now, if the bulbs are really rated for only 10V / 3W, A and C might burn out, but I don't think that's what they're looking for 😉
 
Thanx, that makes sense 🙂 how about question d (ii), thats the one i really dont get. Here is what the marscheme says:

One way is to look at resistor arrangement as a potential divider.
PD across B/D is one fifth of 30V since the parallel resistance is 1/5 of the
5 whole.

So PD across B is 30/5 = 6 V.
Original PD was 10 V.
Now P =V2/r i.e. P proportional to V2
So new power is
(6/10)2 * 3W = 0.36 * 3 =1.08 W

PS: the 2's after anything mean squared
 
Originally posted by: foges
Thanx, that makes sense 🙂 how about question d (ii), thats the one i really dont get. Here is what the marscheme says:

One way is to look at resistor arrangement as a potential divider.
PD across B/D is one fifth of 30V since the parallel resistance is 1 of the
5 whole.

So PD across B is 30/5 = 6 V.
Original PD was 10 V.
Now P =V2/r i.e. P proportional to V2
So new power is
(6/10)2 * 3W = 0.36 * 3 =1.08 W

PS: the 2's after anything mean squared

Are you saying this is your guess or this is the answer?
 
This is the answer (from the marscheme), but i dont understand it (why is the resistance 1/5 of the whole?)
 
If the bulbs are 10V 3W, then they are 33.33 ohms. Total resistance 100 ohm. Add another 33.33 ohm resistor D across B and the restistance of B and D in parallel is 33.33/2 or 16.67 ohms. The total resistance of all 4 resistors is now 33.33 +16.67 + 33.33 = 83.33 ohms. Divide 83.33 by 16.67, and you have 5.

Rob Murphy.
 
Originally posted by: foges
This is the answer (from the marscheme), but i dont understand it (why is the resistance 1/5 of the whole?)

The overall resistance is equal to the resistance of A, plus the resistance of B and D in parallel, plus the resistance of C.

The resistance of A (or C) is equal to twice the resistance of B and D in parallel. This is because putting two identical resistors in parallel is the same as halving the resistance.

So, if we name the parallel resistance (of B and D) R, the resistance of A will be 2R and the resistance of C will also be 2R.

So, the total resistance would be 2R + R + 2R = 5R.
So, the total resistance (5R) is 5 times the resistance of B and D in parallel (R). Or, the resistance of B and D in parallel is 1/5 of the total resistance.
 
Thank you. It makes sense now 😀😀, im still looking for some reading material though, can you recomend any books?
 
Back
Top