• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

RC5-72 client performance question (was: dialup detection problem)

Edit: I got it fixed. The problem was in the "Interfaces to watch" configuration option - I had left it blank, and it needed to have at least an asterisk (*) for the client to detect a network interface.

See new question in post below...
Today, I installed the distributed.net client to run RC5-72 for the first time on my 766MHz Celeron "work" computer with Windows 2000 Pro (doing sound recording and powerpoint for a church). It runs almost all the time (unless the janitor or someone else who thinks they know better shuts it down), but only has a dialup connection once a week (when I bring one up manually, each Sunday afternoon). For that reason, I thought that RC5-72 would make the best project for this system, since it has the ability to cache units for periods of offline-ness. And yes, I do have permission to install software on this system, so that's not a problem.

Anyway, the client installed fine (I downloaded the latest - as of this morning - zipped client from distributed.net). I set it up to use my email address, to only work on RC5-72, to queue enough units for 168 hours, and to run in dial up detection mode where it will automatically send if a connection is available; I did not mess with the network interfaces part, assuming that was best left at its default settings. When I run the client, it says it is not able to find a network interface (that might not be the exact message, but it is something like that; the error message was displayed even when a connection was up), and proceeds to work on a random unit. When I go back tonight, I should be able to post the exact error message. Until then, is there any advice you can give me to try to get this thing crunching away for Team AnandTech?
 
When I run the benchmark, I get these results on the 766MHz Celeron with 128MB of PC/100 SDRAM:
[Jan 12 23:14:17 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (SES 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.87 [1,608,728 keys/sec]
Is that a good number for the type of system I have?
 
Back
Top