RAW support in Android phones—which ones?

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
I usually have my dSLR with me, but when I don't I always have my phone with me. So help me out here, folks. Is RAW support in current Android phones a function of hardware, firmware, the OS, or what? Googling turns up contradictory info, and none of it less than a year old. My GS5 (which I love, but it is getting a bit long in the tooth) will need replacing one day, and when that day comes, I'd like a phone with a good camera and support for RAW shooting. Reading a lot good things about the LG V10, but I'd like some info on other choices and why, exactly, this feature is not available in all Android phones as of, say, 2014. TIA.
 

Graze

Senior member
Nov 27, 2012
468
1
0
Its the phones OS if I am not mistaken. Samsung(and others) baked it into versions of Android that didnt support it.
Anything lollipop and up supports it...of course you will need a camera app that can shoot in RAW also
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Its the phones OS if I am not mistaken. Samsung(and others) baked it into versions of Android that didnt support it.
Anything lollipop and up supports it...of course you will need a camera app that can shoot in RAW also

So, my GS5 is running Lollipop, and I installed Camera FV5 specifically to shoot RAW, but it is not a choice in that app when I go to options, JPEG only. This leads me to believe that some other factor determines whether it can be done. If you read the notes for that app, it specifically names the phones that will shoot RAW with it, which leads me to think it's a hardware thing.
 

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
It's definitely not purely an OS thing. Manual Camera has a tester app for the new API, for future reference.
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Right, that figures. Which takes me back to my original question: if a phone has the ability to do RAW capture, then it must be a hardware capability in concert with the right app. So, somewhere, there must exist a list of phones that can do it. I reckon sooner or later all good phones will, but for now I'd like to know what my upgrade choices are. There has to be a way to run this down.
 

postmortemIA

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2006
7,721
40
91
HTC A9 and 10 support RAW ... and probably other older models that are supported by HTC Camera app
 

ChronoReverse

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2004
2,562
31
91
It's uncommon enough that it'd be mentioned in reviews.

For instance, the Htc 10 has RAW support right out of box using the default camera app.
 

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106

KeithP

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2000
5,664
201
106
In addition to using lollipop (or higher) the camera has to use the camera2 API which not all lollipop phones use. And, as I understand it, even then not all apps support raw on all phones that meet those requirements.

I don't know if the application support is better under Marshmallow.

-KeithP
 

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
In addition to using lollipop (or higher) the camera has to use the camera2 API which not all lollipop phones use. And, as I understand it, even then not all apps support raw on all phones that meet those requirements.

I don't know if the application support is better under Marshmallow.

-KeithP


You can easily get editing apps in the store.
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
In addition to using lollipop (or higher) the camera has to use the camera2 API which not all lollipop phones use. And, as I understand it, even then not all apps support raw on all phones that meet those requirements.

I don't know if the application support is better under Marshmallow.

-KeithP

I believe you've hit on it. I'm in Lightroom daily, so whether I shoot with my dSLR or my phone, I want the advantage of starting with RAW data. As much as I dislike TouchWiz, I'll probably end up getting the S7. I'd prefer a Nexus device, but you can't get one subsidized and I'm not shelling out $600 for a new phone. Still have to wonder why this feature is not standard on all flagship phones.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,080
136
You dont need RAW when your sensor is an eighth of an inch wide.

But anyway, I've found the free RAW apps are actually not bad at all. Also the barebones programs that come with cameras are nice too.
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Sensor size aside, you ALWAYS get more data from an image written out to RAW than some shitty compressed format like JPEG. Try processing a both in LR sometime; the difference is easily noticeable. The goal is to capture on the phone, get the image off the phone and into my PC, an then into LR. Above 5x7, JPEG is garbage.
 

Shlong

Diamond Member
Mar 14, 2002
3,130
59
91
Sensor size aside, you ALWAYS get more data from an image written out to RAW than some shitty compressed format like JPEG. Try processing a both in LR sometime; the difference is easily noticeable. The goal is to capture on the phone, get the image off the phone and into my PC, an then into LR. Above 5x7, JPEG is garbage.

Is there an image codec like ProRes for video... where the image quality isn't degraded enough that you can work with it in post / color grading without taking up huge space like RAW.
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Is there an image codec like ProRes for video... where the image quality isn't degraded enough that you can work with it in post / color grading without taking up huge space like RAW.

Dunno; wish there was, but if there is, I haven't found it. Personally, I'm not overly concerned with space, as stills (even in RAW) don't take up all that much, especially with the smaller sensor size noted above. With up to 128GB of storage available in mobile devices now, I shouldn't think image size would be a major factor. My 16MP dSLR puts out RAW files of about 24MB, which allows me hundreds of shots on a 16GB card.
 

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
Is there an image codec like ProRes for video... where the image quality isn't degraded enough that you can work with it in post / color grading without taking up huge space like RAW.


I don't think video is processed after capturing.