funny... In one phrase you say one thing but describe how you mean another.
You say people have the right to say what they want, but you consider it to be "the right thing to do" to consider any opinion you don't like or disagree with "vile shit." that key word is 'vile' - something repulsive to be hated by everyone. Why? Because you say so.
I didn't say anything remotely bordering on that.
Dehumanizing someone is vile. To me. And to other people. And yet, people are 100% free to say those vile things, and I will continue to support the ability of people to say vile shit just like that. Vile shit doesn't mean it must be universally hated by everyone. It means disgusting. Nasty. Morally wrong.
You are politically free to say something I consider morally wrong. Welcome to America!
And that person should be punished for saying it because you feel offended. what you consider to be "consequences" of speech are harsh punishments reserved for crimes. Not mere disagreement or argument, but punishable via several means.
You're either intentionally leaving out what I said, or misrepresenting it.
I said that the speech is protected politically, leaving US citizen-consumers the ability to punish speech it disagrees with ECONOMICALLY.
Let me state that again: Consumers alive and running around here in the FreeMarket, can and will punish people ECONOMICALLY because guess what...that is what the FreeMarket exists for. In fact, I hear it all the time that the FreeMarket will punish people who violate social mores as consumers can just vote with their wallets, just like shareholders can vote with their feet and divest.
Well, guess what. It is 100% legal for any citizen to boycott any company they want. So, unless you think it should be illegal to start a boycott, then you likely agree that economic punishment is a legitimate way for people to punish behaviour they do not support, or find vile and morally wrong.
This is why pc has gone too far. It, and its followers, only allow one narrative to be permitted. Wrongthink is to be punished severely, not merely disagreed with.
That's a massive stretch. Because people can boycott a product, or talk shit about someone over twitter, there is only one allowed narrative?
I seem to remember people getting upset at Chic-Fil-A a few years back because the CEO made statements against gay marriage or something like that. Chic-Fil-A totally folded in this PC environment, amirite?!? They've failed as a chain, because only one narrative is allowed to exist!!!
Your argument is laughable.
Yes, just one narrative is allowed, and the closure of Chic-Fil-A is proof!!
how thoughtful. :wub:
See, that's just it. The pc agenda dictates what is considered goodthink and wrongthink. You go against that narrative, you get its pc-police screaming "bigot! Misogynist!!" and shame-punish that person either into compliance or silence.
This picture represents the "silence" you describe perfectly.
Just look at all of those people, silenced by Political Correctness!!!!!!!
To disagree with the pc narrative even a tiny bit is to bring down its minions accusing you of the worst crimes-against-pc they can call on. If you don't support women 100% even when she's demanding something completely unreasonable, you're still called a "woman hater". Bring up a genuine problem within a certain ethnic community without malice, you're still called a "racist". Wish to discuss the problems within a pc-protected group? No way, "hatemonger!"
no discussion allowed. Accept our narrative or be shamed and accused until you leave or get booted by a person in power who's either supportive or at least afraid of being shamed themselves for not complying with the demand to deliver pain by proxy.
You really expect anyone to take this pearl-clutching statement seriously when Donald Trump is the leading Republican candidate for President and makes statements that are instantly classified as bigotry, misogyny and racism, EVEN BY OTHER REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES!?!?
Seriously. Trump. Leading every other Republican candidate. Not being silenced. Not being shamed off the stage. Not being booted by a person in power.
Again, Political Correctness is NOT a real problem. It's simply the fact that some people want to be able to say things that they know other people consider vile, and not have any repercussions. End of story.
And you say the truthtellers are the ones incapable of discussion, repeating only key phrases over and over? Not even remotely close, although the pc crowd with endlessly crow their pc phrases to no end, as if repetition made them true (no matter how many times their precious myths get debunked - like the 'pay gap'.)
if we're not even allowed to have a discussion, the ones shutting down the discussion is part of the problem. Pc is shutting down discussion. Period.
Ipso facto by this very conversation, the above is absolutely incorrect. Here we are. Having the discussion. Just like Trump is.
No one is "shutting down" the conversation. It's that people don't speak up and say things they know they'll get pointed at for saying. The conversation occurs here, there and everywhere, all day, every day. But, many people who want to say racist, bigoted, misogynist things keep their mouths shut because they're afraid of the consequences.
BONUS ROUND!
The Planned Parenthood videos which do not show ANY illegal behaviour or wrongdoing, are causing people to throw fits.
In fact, the right is using the GUBMINT(!) to try to defund Planned Parenthood as we speak!
That's an economic boycott, using the government, to punish SPEECH that the RIGHT considers politically incorrect.
OH NO! The PC MONSTER IS COMING FOR THE LIBRUULS!
Funny, that.