That's not that unbelievable, if you assume that the first results use some crappy ram. The difference between good DDR5 and the low-end stuff is already substantial on ADL.Or some of the more-recent numbers are fudged. Or all the numbers are fudged. It's hard to say, but it's awfully fishy to me that we have some 13900k results matching the 12900ks (more or less) and then some others that far exceed it, in the same benchmark, in ST performance. Plus it's just GB5 so feh who cares about that garbage?