Originally posted by: Kwint Sommer
SATA150 will work with a SATA2 motherbaord right?
Uh, assuming you're talking about mirroring the 10k RPM RAID0 (150gb + 150gb) against the 7200RPM single disk, is that even possible with different platter rotational speeds? I thought RAID1 required the spindles to be synchronized when mirroring...Originally posted by: tbogstad
man this is so frigging tempting, this was $319.00 with a $100.00 rebate 3 days ago, now it is $20.00 cheaper with the $50.00 rebate.
if i was not so broke i would snatch 2 of these up for raid-0 and use my 300 gig 7200rpm drive for raid-1, to have the best of both worlds. SPEED and REDUNDANCY
Originally posted by: AStar617
Uh, assuming you're talking about mirroring the 10k RPM RAID0 (150gb + 150gb) against the 7200RPM single disk, is that even possible with different platter rotational speeds? I thought RAID1 required the spindles to be synchronized when mirroring...Originally posted by: tbogstad
man this is so frigging tempting, this was $319.00 with a $100.00 rebate 3 days ago, now it is $20.00 cheaper with the $50.00 rebate.
if i was not so broke i would snatch 2 of these up for raid-0 and use my 300 gig 7200rpm drive for raid-1, to have the best of both worlds. SPEED and REDUNDANCY
Originally posted by: TekDemon
Originally posted by: AStar617
Uh, assuming you're talking about mirroring the 10k RPM RAID0 (150gb + 150gb) against the 7200RPM single disk, is that even possible with different platter rotational speeds? I thought RAID1 required the spindles to be synchronized when mirroring...Originally posted by: tbogstad
man this is so frigging tempting, this was $319.00 with a $100.00 rebate 3 days ago, now it is $20.00 cheaper with the $50.00 rebate.
if i was not so broke i would snatch 2 of these up for raid-0 and use my 300 gig 7200rpm drive for raid-1, to have the best of both worlds. SPEED and REDUNDANCY
Yeah sadly for him RAID doesn't work like that, lol.
Personally I dream of a five disk RAID-5 array build on those 750GB seagate barracudas...3 Terabytes of data and redundancy to boot...and performance that would make your eyeballs bleed (it's second in file transfer rate only to the 150GB raptor...it's actually faster than the 74 and 36 raptors!).
Of course the RAID controller and the PCI bus would really be the limiting factor at that point. Hmm come to think of it...are there any good PCI-E Raid-5 cards? lol
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
$1/gig and i'll bite
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
how much faster will my boot in windows be if i normally take 1 full minute to boot from the time i press the start button till windows is done (with 1x150gb raptor) as compared to 2 of these in raid 0?
Originally posted by: TekDemon
Originally posted by: AStar617
Uh, assuming you're talking about mirroring the 10k RPM RAID0 (150gb + 150gb) against the 7200RPM single disk, is that even possible with different platter rotational speeds? I thought RAID1 required the spindles to be synchronized when mirroring...Originally posted by: tbogstad
man this is so frigging tempting, this was $319.00 with a $100.00 rebate 3 days ago, now it is $20.00 cheaper with the $50.00 rebate.
if i was not so broke i would snatch 2 of these up for raid-0 and use my 300 gig 7200rpm drive for raid-1, to have the best of both worlds. SPEED and REDUNDANCY
Yeah sadly for him RAID doesn't work like that, lol.
Personally I dream of a five disk RAID-5 array build on those 750GB seagate barracudas...3 Terabytes of data and redundancy to boot...and performance that would make your eyeballs bleed (it's second in file transfer rate only to the 150GB raptor...it's actually faster than the 74 and 36 raptors!).
Of course the RAID controller and the PCI bus would really be the limiting factor at that point. Hmm come to think of it...are there any good PCI-E Raid-5 cards? lol
Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
how much faster will my boot in windows be if i normally take 1 full minute to boot from the time i press the start button till windows is done (with 1x150gb raptor) as compared to 2 of these in raid 0?
no noticeable difference