• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rape Fantasy (?) mistake.... WTF

lancestorm

Platinum Member
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- A California man has pleaded guilty to residential burglary after he set up a meeting with a woman on a rape fantasy Internet chat page, but instead broke into a different woman's apartment.

Michael Todd Howard, 35, pleaded guilty in a court in San Diego Tuesday in return for an expected sentence of one year in jail and probation, prosecutors said.

According to court documents, last September, Howard broke into the home of a woman with whom he thought he had set up an encounter on what was described as a "rape fantasy" chat site. After he entered the wrong apartment, he hit and struggled with the 25-year-old woman inside, who told law enforcement officials she thought she was going to be killed.

The victim stopped the attack by yelling and attacking Howard's testicles. Howard then asked for the name the victim used in the chat room and she responded by saying she had never visited a chat room and did not have a personal computer.

As a part of the plea deal, prosecutors dropped charges of intent to commit rape, false imprisonment and possession of illegal drugs. Howard will be sentenced next month.
 
Originally posted by: LordJezo
I really hope that is an Aprils Fools joke.. but I would not be suprised at all if it wasnt.

I do too, poor woman! It was on cnn.com. I can't even imagine. How delirious and scared did she come off as compared to the acting, expecting-it women?!
 
hmmm... doesn't have the mens rea for rape, or for burglary...

"residential burglary"... i wasn't aware there was another kind
 
You would think if someone was going to partake in such deviase behavior they would make damn certain they had the correct address!

What a Fool! 😀
 
Originally posted by: Nanotech
You would think if someone was going to partake in such deviase behavior they would make damn certain they had the correct address!

What a Fool! 😀

the other person may have intentionally given him the wrong address
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Nanotech
You would think if someone was going to partake in such deviase behavior they would make damn certain they had the correct address!

What a Fool! 😀

the other person may have intentionally given him the wrong address
Bwhahaha...

Ouch.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Nanotech
You would think if someone was going to partake in such deviase behavior they would make damn certain they had the correct address!

What a Fool! 😀

the other person may have intentionally given him the wrong address

Damn. I would imagine she would have testified if his story was true? The real girl I mean, not the one he almost raped.
 
why did he plead guilty? CA criminal law must be f-ed up. either that or he fabricated the story
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
why did he plead guilty? CA criminal law must be f-ed up. either that or he fabricated the story

Probably a plea bargain. He agrees to plead guilty to lesser charges in exchange for them dropping the worse ones. Prosecution may have felt his story was genuine or that a jury would feel it was.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
why did he plead guilty? CA criminal law must be f-ed up. either that or he fabricated the story

Well, he did break into the house, which is pretty much the definition of burglary.
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
Originally posted by: ElFenix
why did he plead guilty? CA criminal law must be f-ed up. either that or he fabricated the story

Well, he did break into the house, which is pretty much the definition of burglary.

no that the def of B&E you have to steal or attempt to steal something for it to be burglary
 
I thought it was defined in the English Common Law that as long as you enter someone's house without permission its considered breaking and entering. Whether you stole or attempted to steal is not important.
 
Back
Top