Ranking the phone manufacturers by quality

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
Apple, Moto, Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony.

This is how I'd rate them when it comes to attention to detail and longevity of the build quality(how long it goes before falling apart). I don't consider metal vs plastic being indicative of build quality. Build quality to me is about things like crease thickness and buttons and doors and covers becoming loose or falling off. Reverse Apple and Moto if fragility is taken into account.
 

kyrax12

Platinum Member
May 21, 2010
2,416
2
81
Sorry to be completely off topic, but I don't want to start a new thread to ask this question.

So, I read that you should turn off the phone before adding in/removing a SD card. I didn't turn off the phone when I did this and was wondering if I caused any potential damage to the SD card or on the phone.

Anyone don't turn off their phones when adding in or removing their SD card here?

I have the Galaxy s4.
 

Ksyder

Golden Member
Feb 14, 2006
1,829
1
81
Sorry to be completely off topic, but I don't want to start a new thread to ask this question.

So, I read that you should turn off the phone before adding in/removing a SD card. I didn't turn off the phone when I did this and was wondering if I caused any potential damage to the SD card or on the phone.

Anyone don't turn off their phones when adding in or removing their SD card here?

I have the Galaxy s4.

In many phones you have to take out the battery to remove the SD card so a power cycling is mandatory anyways.

I don't think it will hurt anything, probably more of a data corruption/program error sort of thing when you possibly pull the card in the middle of a read or write.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
Eh, quality is not only about build quality, but also about software. IMO, iOS is still the best mobile OS which is why Apple takes top. Nokia's phones w/windows 8 are also superb...haven't tried Sony products at all, and I think the software on the new Motorola is intriguing...
Software quality can always be changed after a phone is out by updates(see: iOS 6 vs. iOS 7 vitrol debates among Apple users), or installing custom ROMs.
Build quality cannot be changed once a phone is released.

I don't care about any manufacturer's software quality because at the end of the day, I always root my phone and remove a manufacturer's junk(TouchWiz, Sense, etc...) by installing CyanogenMod on Day 1.
The quality of CyanogenMod is not that different among the different Android manufacturer devices(as long as your device has full support which all "Nexus" devices already have by default).

If you're talking about the whole OS software "in general" quality, then Android(running stock or CyanogenMod) > Windows Phone > iOS.
But I will never own a Windows Phone as long as Google Apps(along with other 3rd party apps which is still a problem despite people still claiming otherwise) are not on it, so realistically for me Android > iOS(only because the major Google Apps are on it) > Windows Phone. I'm not a fan of Windows Phone Tile system and I'm not a fan of Apple's walled garden approach to things. Those things are part of software quality whether you choose to believe so or not.

Your idea that iOS is still the best mobile OS is as subjective as someone else stating that BB10 or Symbian is still the best mobile OS.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
Apple, Moto, Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony.

This is how I'd rate them when it comes to attention to detail and longevity of the build quality(how long it goes before falling apart). I don't consider metal vs plastic being indicative of build quality. Build quality to me is about things like crease thickness and buttons and doors and covers becoming loose or falling off. Reverse Apple and Moto if fragility is taken into account.
Also this.
Regarding build quality, metal vs plastic vs glass debates are quite frankly retarded.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,312
687
126
Also this.
Regarding build quality, metal vs plastic vs glass debates are quite frankly retarded.

I have to agree. At this point, the choice of casing material is pretty much a subjective matter. And metal will be out of the question when/if flexible display tech arrives. Said that, I do like metal looks personally. Glass looks are even better! Many do not like glass material for practical reasons and obviously I cannot argue they are wrong.

Samsung phones are of high quality. I still can't think of any other phone that is as potent as the S4 in such a small package. (esp. the Octa-core version) Gorilla Glass 3 in itself gets a point from me. (why are other OEMs slow to adopt the GG3? It's unbelievably smooth and smudge-resistant)
 
Last edited:

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,917
3,898
136
How much of LG's low rankings in this thread are based on their phones from 2-3 years ago? I think most of their stuff from the last year or so has been great.
 

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
Inb4 Blackberry is dead. I know it is and I don't care.

Anyway, just replaced a couple of aging BB Bolds.

The 9700 is still running like a champ as it closes in on its 4th b-day in December and we'll keep it as a backup.

The 9780 (3rd b-day coming up) has had a rough life. It's been swimming in kiddie pools on 3 or so occasions, hit the pavement from ear level or just been flung through the air when I lost grip as I took it away from the ear or whatever. Even spent some time in the farm being lost overnight in cow$hit or just dropped in the mud. GPS stopped working about 8 months ago and the WiFi signals come in about half as strong as they used to. The earphone is only working on occasion, too, and phone calls are barely audible even when it does. That being said it has never been in a protective case and when I look back on the abuse it has been through, I can't believe it works at all. I have lost and seen others lose phones (iPhones, Samsung Galaxies, Samsung Phones, Motorola Droids & Razrs, etc.) to much, much, much less. Of those the only devices that I thought have been able to run with my BBs were some Nokia phones and a Lumia 710 that is still going strong for my brother-in-law.

The battery life on these old BB batteries was just so poor that we were looking at new batteries for old phones (and maybe a couple of other parts for the 9780) or just get new phones. I had tried an inexpensive battery for the 9780 over a year ago and I wasn't impressed so rather than drop $50 each for new batteries, we picked up a Nexus 4 16GB and a BBZ10.

It's only been a week or so, but the Z10 just feels more rugged than the Nexus 4. The removable back of the Z10 feels a little light and breakable, but I really think it was designed to wear out and be replaced when the tacky surface on the back wears down so I will have no problem making provisions to replace it every year or so. I say this because they could have easily used a harder, smoother, slicker surface like the Nexus 4, but if it means the real parts of the phone can stay intact because I stopped dropping my smartphone on the ground then I call that good engineering. Otherwise, it just feels more "tight" than the Android phones I was checking out. The Xperia Z and HTC One wer pretty good in this regard, but otherwise nothing else felt in the same class when I held it; i.e. GS3, GS4, iPhones, LG Optimus L9, F3, F6, Lumia 521, 925, Nexus 4. The Android phones and the Lumias just felt creaky in general.

Don't get me wrong, there's a reason that the wife is getting the Nexus 4. It is easier to use and, of course, the big reason is the app store. Aside from that, there is nothing that would make believe it is a "better" phone. It feels like a toy.

Time will tell, though.
 
Last edited:

PowerYoga

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2001
4,603
0
0
samsung build quality is fine, about on par with LG and HTC. I'd argue nokia and moto build quality is better than apples.