Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Queasy
You didn't get a first baseman. You got a catcher. Salty is one of the best up and coming catchers in the league. He was stuck behind McCann in Atlanta though.
The Braves put Salty at first only because their first base situation was so dire and needed Salty's bat in the line-up. Rangers also got the Braves best minor-league shortstop prospect and two pitching prospects.
Article says catcher-first baseman. Our most urgent need is for a starting pitcher who can anchor down the rotation. We could have easily stolen one of ATL's starters for Mark.
Like I said, Salty is a true catcher who was put at first because of need. You don't want Salty at first base because he's honestly barely passable defensively.
You wouldn't have gotten any of ATL's starters because they barely have any right now. Atlanta's starting pitching rotation has been decimated because of injuries and they are in need of a third starting pitcher. All they really have right now is Smoltz and Hudson.
Then we should have traded for a starter on a different team, my whole point of the post. Hicks has run this team into the ground. He didn't even attend the Dallas Stars playoff games and instead, went to a meaningless Rangers game in which we ended up losing anyway. We have a decent catcher in Laird anyway...who gives a crap whose catching the ball when every guy we have throwing it sucks?
EDIT - you'll make the point that the catcher plays a part in how successful a pitcher is. We had gold glover Pudge Rodriguez for what, 10 years? Even when we were in the playoffs and constantly on the brink of being very good, our pitching still wasn't all that.