• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Random Fact of the Day!

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Did you know that we could take the entire world population and fit them inside of the state of Texas with a population density that is less than New York City's?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000.
 
Originally posted by: Aflac
I don't believe that for a second.

Are you going to do this every day?

You don't believe that?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000.

PWND.

Edit: I did this math myself. If you want to google the stats and do the math as well, you can.
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Aflac
I don't believe that for a second.

Are you going to do this every day?

You don't believe that?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000.

PWND.

Edit: I did this math myself. If you want to google the stats and do the math as well, you can.

Okay I should clarify. It's not that I didn't believe it, it's that it was too crazy to be true.

But where do you draw the boundaries when it comes to land and population?
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Aflac
I don't believe that for a second.

Are you going to do this every day?

You don't believe that?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000.

PWND.

Edit: I did this math myself. If you want to google the stats and do the math as well, you can.

Liar
 
"Did you know that we could take the entire world population and fit them inside of the state of Texas with a population density that is less than New York City's?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000. "

call me crazy but what does dividing the land mass of texas by the land mass of new york do?
 
Originally posted by: confused1234
"Did you know that we could take the entire world population and fit them inside of the state of Texas with a population density that is less than New York City's?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000. "

call me crazy but what does dividing the land mass of texas by the land mass of new york do?

wow you must suck at math
 
Originally posted by: confused1234
"Did you know that we could take the entire world population and fit them inside of the state of Texas with a population density that is less than New York City's?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000. "

call me crazy but what does dividing the land mass of texas by the land mass of new york do?

there are 816 theoretical NYC's in the state of texas, each having a population of 8.1mil blah blah blah blah
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Aflac
I don't believe that for a second.

Are you going to do this every day?

You don't believe that?

NYC = Roughly 8.1 Million people and roughly 321 land square miles.

Texas is roughly 262,000 Land square miles.

262,000/321 = 816.

816 x 8,100,000 = 6,609,600,000.

PWND.

Edit: I did this math myself. If you want to google the stats and do the math as well, you can.

Impressive. I retract my delcaration of shenanigans.
 
The infrastructure for such a city would be very difficult. Getting resources like food and energy would still require people living in many parts of the world.
 
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Quit thinking like that🙁

You try and bring NYC population to my Lone Star State and I'll have to shoot ya🙂

hehe. It's not so much that it's a good idea for it to be in Texas, it's just that Texas represents the best example because it's square land miles are perfect, and people have a good idea of the size of Texas.
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Quit thinking like that🙁

You try and bring NYC population to my Lone Star State and I'll have to shoot ya🙂

hehe. It's not so much that it's a good idea for it to be in Texas, it's just that Texas represents the best example because it's square land miles are perfect, and people have a good idea of the size of Texas.

Really, I don't think people do have an idea how big TX is. Imagine driving 8+hrs, and still not being out of state yet.
 
If you think texas is big...try Western Australia for size 😉

Western Australia is Australia's largest state in area, covering the western third of the mainland, and is bordered by South Australia and the Northern Territory. It is, after the Sakha Republic in Russia, the second largest subnational entity (Statoid) in the world. The capital city, Perth, is one of the most isolated cities of its size on the planet, being closer to Jakarta (3,007 km) than to Sydney (3,284 km).

Population
(End of March 2005)
- Population 2,003,800 (4th)
- Density 0.79/km² (7th)
Area
- Total 2,645,615 km² (1st)
- Land 2,529,875 km²
- Water 115,740 km² (4.37%)

😀
 
Back
Top