to start, here's what i'm running right now:
msi k7t turbo2 mb
384mb pc133 ram
2400+ athlon xp
geforce4 ti4200
40gb dmax plus hdd
in general, i'm pretty happy with things, and until HL2, Doom3, etc, come out i'm in no hurry to make the leap to the dx9 generation video cards; however, i realize at this point the one glaring bottleneck in my system is that antiquated sdram. so, i'm toying with some different upgrade options (in descending order of ambition/price):
1) go all out and get an NForce2 board w/ 512mb of 3200ddr and hope my 2400+ can keep up. i'm looking to stay under $200, thus limiting the amount of memory to under 1 gig.
2) find a nice kt333 or even 266a mb (i like msi, and these can be had for like $30 now) and get some slightly cheaper 2100 or 2700 ram. i'm still probably not going to get a gig and stay below the $200 mark, but it's possible.
3) really go cheap and just get a couple of 512 pc133 sticks for about $70.
so, my question really is, how much of an improvement will i see going over to ddr? and will going all the way to the 400mhz stuff really be worth it considering the cpu i've got? i don't mind switching out my mb, so labor isn't really a factor here, but if i'm spending almost 3 times the money to get a mb and ram combo that would be near the end of their end of the road (with Athlon64 around the corner, i'm looking to go in that direction about this time next year), will i see *significant* results over simply getting more of the cheap sdram? can anyone here speak from their experiences? i know sdram dropped off the radar screen some time ago, but if anyone has some direct sdram vs ddr (preferably one of the newer chipsets) numbers, i'd really appreciate it.
thanks for any input you could give.
tom
msi k7t turbo2 mb
384mb pc133 ram
2400+ athlon xp
geforce4 ti4200
40gb dmax plus hdd
in general, i'm pretty happy with things, and until HL2, Doom3, etc, come out i'm in no hurry to make the leap to the dx9 generation video cards; however, i realize at this point the one glaring bottleneck in my system is that antiquated sdram. so, i'm toying with some different upgrade options (in descending order of ambition/price):
1) go all out and get an NForce2 board w/ 512mb of 3200ddr and hope my 2400+ can keep up. i'm looking to stay under $200, thus limiting the amount of memory to under 1 gig.
2) find a nice kt333 or even 266a mb (i like msi, and these can be had for like $30 now) and get some slightly cheaper 2100 or 2700 ram. i'm still probably not going to get a gig and stay below the $200 mark, but it's possible.
3) really go cheap and just get a couple of 512 pc133 sticks for about $70.
so, my question really is, how much of an improvement will i see going over to ddr? and will going all the way to the 400mhz stuff really be worth it considering the cpu i've got? i don't mind switching out my mb, so labor isn't really a factor here, but if i'm spending almost 3 times the money to get a mb and ram combo that would be near the end of their end of the road (with Athlon64 around the corner, i'm looking to go in that direction about this time next year), will i see *significant* results over simply getting more of the cheap sdram? can anyone here speak from their experiences? i know sdram dropped off the radar screen some time ago, but if anyone has some direct sdram vs ddr (preferably one of the newer chipsets) numbers, i'd really appreciate it.
thanks for any input you could give.
tom