Ram prices, 128 Mushkin or 256 Generic?

swissarmy

Junior Member
Oct 30, 2000
12
0
0
Hi all,
Question about RAM for everyone. I'm building a computer, dead set on buying a stick of PC133 rev2 ram, when the prices of generic pc133 go through the floor. Seeing as Mushkin (which I consider to be of the highest order quality) is more than twice the price of normal PC133 ram, wouldn't it be better to get two sticks of the generic and have 256MB in total? I suppose that applications that only use the first 128 would have been better suited by the lower cas latency (2-2-2) of the Mushkin, but will the overall system be speedier b/c of it's overall greater amount of ram? I figure if you're only using below 128 ram for most things, the mushkin is a better idea for performance, and only when you go start to really utilize the extra stick is it worth it. My question (not to mention all the others pepper inside...) is which I should go with, main goals being gaming performance, DVD ripping, web surfing, and multiple applications open. Thanks

jes
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
256 generic every day. Mushkin ram is just cas2, the generic probably cas3, not a big deal, you wont even notice. If you aren't gonna run the bus over 133-140 forget the muskin, this is a nobrainer
 

swissarmy

Junior Member
Oct 30, 2000
12
0
0
this is running on an AMD 800, btw... Say I was running quake 3 and nothing else, wouldn't the perf be higher with the cas 2 than cas 3? this isn't worth it?

jes
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
it'll be like a 1 fps difference, you'll rather have the ram. i mean if you had infinite money just get 2 mushkins
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
You have your Abit KT7 running at 153MHz, 336MHz DDR? :p
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,032
125
106
No I have an abit kt7 running 115mhz fsb. The memory is running 153mhz fsb+pci=memory 115+37.95=152.95
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,032
125
106
on Intel's BX and older chipsets it is but with via's 133 boards and I guess intel's 815 it can be fsb=memory or fsb+pci=memory in order to get 133mhz memory while using a 100mhz bus. I am pretty sure the via apollo 133 and intell 815 boards even support a fsb-pci=memory just so people can use 133mhz bus PIIIs and still use their old pc-100 memory.
 

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
The KT7 will run the RAM at FSB+PCI just like thedarkwolf posted. Mine is running 105/35 + 4= 109. Host CLK + PCI CLK= 135MHz+ 9 = 144MHz RAM speed.
 

PCResources

Banned
Oct 4, 2000
2,499
0
0
If you want to have the best ram out there, get Crucial, it's not too expensive either.

For an Athlon system i wouldn't recommend buying the generic, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

Just avoid the hassle by getting some Crucial memory, it's what i use when i build my systems and servers.

Patrick Palm

Am speaking for PC Resources
 

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
In my opinion, and after using a lot of different RAM, the Mosel Vitelic PC133 is the best. I am not knocking Crucial, I participate in their VAR program and use it for systems that I sell. In my personal system I use only the Mosel Vitelic, and it is flawless. John is selling it for a very good price, or you could pay more for the same stuff through Mushkin.