- Feb 22, 2005
- 7,280
- 0
- 0
Here's the background:
Our company has a sales team, support team, and development team. There's management all over, but those are the primary parts of the company. We each have "metrics" that are used to measure our performance, but nothing special.
I'm in support, we hit our goals (which realistically aren't very high), but in addition to phone/email support we also do all account setups, minor programming, API integration with outside developers, etc. We also handle QA/UAT testing for all development items. Basically we do our jobs, plus we're borrowed by other parts of the company (we don't do internal billing so it's not very well tracked).
Sales was totally understaffed the last few years, and a lot of leads/opportunities went stale and were ignored, so we lost out on a lot of potential business. This is the fault of management and the sales department, not support.
Development is way behind on projects, and updates they do tend to break and have to be rolled back, so overall they've done a crap job all year. We have a huge number of developers too, all highly paid, yet do horrible jobs IMO. Bad processes, no central bug tracker, stuff like that. Once again not support's fault.
We were told that the company overall "did not meet goals" and so there would not be a lot of money for raises this year. Is it fair that our department is penalized for failures of other departments? Or that they still get to share in the tiny amount put aside for raises despite being bad performers? Most of the people in support work their asses off, work extra hours (no extra pay, we're salaried), do extra projects, etc. Sales work less hours than they're supposed to, development does the same. Now we're potentially losing people who are mad about not getting any raise.
This the same at most companies, or is this just a shaft deal for us? I can't complain too much as I did get a good raise, but I feel bad that people that worked hard didn't because some other slackers in the company don't care about their jobs.
Our company has a sales team, support team, and development team. There's management all over, but those are the primary parts of the company. We each have "metrics" that are used to measure our performance, but nothing special.
I'm in support, we hit our goals (which realistically aren't very high), but in addition to phone/email support we also do all account setups, minor programming, API integration with outside developers, etc. We also handle QA/UAT testing for all development items. Basically we do our jobs, plus we're borrowed by other parts of the company (we don't do internal billing so it's not very well tracked).
Sales was totally understaffed the last few years, and a lot of leads/opportunities went stale and were ignored, so we lost out on a lot of potential business. This is the fault of management and the sales department, not support.
Development is way behind on projects, and updates they do tend to break and have to be rolled back, so overall they've done a crap job all year. We have a huge number of developers too, all highly paid, yet do horrible jobs IMO. Bad processes, no central bug tracker, stuff like that. Once again not support's fault.
We were told that the company overall "did not meet goals" and so there would not be a lot of money for raises this year. Is it fair that our department is penalized for failures of other departments? Or that they still get to share in the tiny amount put aside for raises despite being bad performers? Most of the people in support work their asses off, work extra hours (no extra pay, we're salaried), do extra projects, etc. Sales work less hours than they're supposed to, development does the same. Now we're potentially losing people who are mad about not getting any raise.
This the same at most companies, or is this just a shaft deal for us? I can't complain too much as I did get a good raise, but I feel bad that people that worked hard didn't because some other slackers in the company don't care about their jobs.
