• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

RAID 0 with WD Red or Seagate

N

note235

Golden Member
Western Digital Red 3TB

or

Barracuda 7200.14 ST3000DM001 3TB 7200 RPM

for raid 0?
I'm going to use this as apart of my editing rig
 
The Cuda's cause they are cheaper, faster and just as reliable. All drives fail, esp. the WD's since the flood. Give yourself a belated Xmas gift by not buying into all the Seagate bashing, it's just rumor exhuming from way back in 2007 with a bad batch of 1.5's. If you're the timid type, you can buy a 3 or 5 year warranty and they'll still undercut the Red's. Be smarter than the watercooler jimmies!

The exhuming will follow this post, guaranteed.
 
Last edited:
kleinkinstein said:
The Cuda's cause they are cheaper, faster and just as reliable. All drives fail, esp. the WD's since the flood. Give yourself a belated Xmas gift by not buying into all the Seagate bashing, it's just rumor exhuming from way back in 2007 with a bad batch of 1.5's. If you're the timid type, you can buy a 3 or 5 year warranty and they'll still undercut the Red's. Be smarter than the watercooler jimmies!

The exhuming will follow this post, guaranteed.
Click to expand...

I've had nothing but great experiences with my WD drives, and bad experiences with my Seagate drives, but I agree with the above.
 
ive had both so im fine but i guess ill sell my caviar blacks which are only 6 months lol and get the 3tb + square trade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top