Sorry if this is a stupid question..
My current setup is a RAID 0 with 2 40 gig 7200 RPM drives. I do, and run everything off of those drives. (Another small drive used for critical backup information).
I plan on upgrading my computer within the next few months, and I'm currently thinking about getting 2 Raptors and putting them into a RAID 0.
Naturally, I want all of my games, newsgroup readers, etc to be on the Raptor RAID. Then I'd probably either just separate the other RAID, or use it as storage for MP3's and general stuff like that.
My question basically is, is there *much* of an advantage to having a COMPLETELY separate boot drive? Basically having nothing on it but the OS. And then use the RAID to store all the programs / games / hard drive intensive applications? Does that offer any great performance gain, or would running XP as well as my programs/games off the Raptor RAID be the fastest scenario?
Thanks for any insight!
My current setup is a RAID 0 with 2 40 gig 7200 RPM drives. I do, and run everything off of those drives. (Another small drive used for critical backup information).
I plan on upgrading my computer within the next few months, and I'm currently thinking about getting 2 Raptors and putting them into a RAID 0.
Naturally, I want all of my games, newsgroup readers, etc to be on the Raptor RAID. Then I'd probably either just separate the other RAID, or use it as storage for MP3's and general stuff like that.
My question basically is, is there *much* of an advantage to having a COMPLETELY separate boot drive? Basically having nothing on it but the OS. And then use the RAID to store all the programs / games / hard drive intensive applications? Does that offer any great performance gain, or would running XP as well as my programs/games off the Raptor RAID be the fastest scenario?
Thanks for any insight!