happy medium
Lifer
- Jun 8, 2003
- 14,387
- 480
- 126
At the very least Id like the 580 & 6970 to trade blows - the 580 looks great, if ATI can bring in a worthy opponent, i cant wait for what it means for relative pricing
Amen to that.
At the very least Id like the 580 & 6970 to trade blows - the 580 looks great, if ATI can bring in a worthy opponent, i cant wait for what it means for relative pricing
Sexiest build you'll ever see-
Q9550
HD4870
4GB G.Skill
--Antec 1200--
Bet you my build is sexier? Very close to the same as mine.
I was trying to say Nvidia's next generation is here, AMD is late to the party. A month late,so far.
It's more like a refresh, like the GTX 285, 275, and 260-216. Nvidia just named it like a new generation. Which isn't surprising. They basically skipped the 300 series (re-badged OEM cards), and I think they just ran out of numbers for the 400 series - they have three, three, separate cards all called the GTX 460.So 580 GTX is all Nvidia can do for a next gen? That is a pretty pathetic increase from "last gen" (20% from 480). Pretty sure AMD will have a much bigger leap from their last gen (even though the 5970 still beats the 580).
So 580 GTX is all Nvidia can do for a next gen? That is a pretty pathetic increase from "last gen" (20% from 480). Pretty sure AMD will have a much bigger leap from their last gen (even though the 5970 still beats the 580).
Are you guys SERIOUSLY arguing about a FAKE slide?
![]()
Look at what Fud writes and whats in the slide. He said this is AMD's own internal #'s... oops, look like he took a fake slide and ran with the numbers.
FYI it's the 6870 slide with the exact same numbers with parts of it lopped off - a sloppy fake.
If this isn't enough proof that Fud has no insider info and is half the time making @%# up I don't know what it'll take to convince people
Or you could look at it any way that makes you feel giddy, even if you have to fool yourself with false information*.or you could look at it this way...
Nvidia's last year chip is competing with 2 generations of AMD chips. The 58xx series and the 69xx series. Like I said ,AMD is lucky the gtx480 was not the 580.
Or you could look at it any way that makes you feel giddy, even if you have to fool yourself with false information*.
*The 400 and 500 cards released this year, not last year.
Happy, I merely extended your thinking of how 580 is a new generation. Also how convenient you forget the 5970.
The people who remember Fraud, er Fuad, from the days of TheINQ when Groo was there will not be surprised by this revelation.
Nvidia is late to the party. We already have the 68xx from AMD, but no 550/560 from Nvidia.
:hmm:
Like I said AMD should thank the TSMC gods that the real gtx was not released. No matter which way you look at it AMD is behind.
Like I said AMD should thank the TSMC gods that the real gtx was not released. No matter which way you look at it AMD is behind.
JHH himself admitted their management were at fault. Oh wait, Nvidia never messes up.. its all TSMC's fault.
http://video.golem.de/games/3800/nv...-ueber-fermis-technische-schwierigkeiten.html
It was the fastest chip then and is even faster now. Whats your point?
or you could look at it this way...
Nvidia's last year chip is competing with 2 generations of AMD chips. The 58xx series and the 69xx series. Like I said ,AMD is lucky the gtx480 was not the 580.
Good point :biggrin:Does he even read what he writes?
"When we compare our own GTX 480 results and add 20 percent on top of that it turns that Cayman XT loses to both GTX 570 and especially GTX 580."
What? 570 = 480, if you add 20% to the 480 score, how can you lose to the 570? WTF?
Booo fudzilla
