Radeon HD 6850 vs Radeon HD 5850 OC

Aidios

Junior Member
May 7, 2011
10
0
0
I'm building a system and would like some input from a wider range of tech-specialists. I'll be using the system for gaming, and would like to be able to run the games on max settings. The highest resolution they'll be running at is 1680x1050. Both cards are 1GB 256-bit GDDR5. I don't know what the deciding factors are for video cards when it comes to gaming though, so here they are.

GIGABYTE GV-R585OC-1GD Radeon HD 5850 (Cypress Pro)

ASUS EAH6850 DC/2DIS/1GD5/V2 Radeon HD 6850

Of these two video cards, which would be most suitable for what I'm aiming for? Thanks!
 

Muyoso

Senior member
Dec 6, 2005
310
0
0
I am by no means the most knowledgable on this subject, but I believe the ONLY thing the 6850 is better at is tesselation. A stock 5850 is faster and better for gaming in most situations than a stock 6850.

You should be able to run pretty much any game at max settings using either of those cards at that resolution, but the edge will almost always be to the 5850.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,490
6,555
136
They're so close that you're not going to notice any difference in real life.

5850 pros: slightly faster
6850 pros: slightly faster in tessellation, better AF, uses less power
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,682
329
126
The 5850 is a faster card, but as said not by much.

They both OC nicely.

At similar prices I would get a 5850 (I got a 6850 since at that time the 5850 were still €80 more expensive).

At that resolution you shouldn't see many differences so saving some money it is a valid strategy.
 

WMD

Senior member
Apr 13, 2011
476
0
0
They are both VLIW5 architecture with 32ROPs and 256bit GDDR5. The main difference is the 5850 has 50% more shader units. The 6850 somewhat make up for it with higher clocks but still trails the 5850 by over 10% in benchmarks. The gap can grow to 20% in shader intensive games

f1_2560_1600.gif


bfbc2_1920_1200.gif


The 6800 series are better in tessellation but it is hardly an advantage in real world applications. The 6850 still trails 5850 in tessellation games

avp_1920_1200.gif


metro_2033_1920_1200.gif


http://ht4u.net/reviews/2010/amd_radeon_hd_6850_hd_6870_test/index31.php

11.4 drivers improved the 6 series even furthur so their almost neck and neck

We heard that argument many times in the past with 5770 vs 4870. 5770 is still slower than 4870 1gb because drivers can not make up for hardware limitations. Drivers cannot magically make a card outperform another card with 50% more shader units.

OP: Get the Gigabyte 5850OC. With the 5% increased clocks it will practical perform the same as a 6870
 
Last edited:

Modular

Diamond Member
Jul 1, 2005
5,027
67
91
Or grab the Sapphire Xtreme one and overclock it yourself. It's on a smaller PCB (the same one as the 6850) and from the reviews I've read, it actually uses less power than the 6850.
 

Kroze

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2001
4,052
1
0
Get 2 used Radeon 4870 for $160.

Have a monster of a graphic card for cheap FTW.

That's what i'm doing anyway.
 

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,901
205
106
Get 2 used Radeon 4870 for $160.

Have a monster of a graphic card for cheap FTW.

That's what i'm doing anyway.
he's better off with a 5850. about same performance (5850 ~ 4870X2) and MUCH less power draw without the drawbacks of multi-GPU.
 

WMD

Senior member
Apr 13, 2011
476
0
0
If by Gigabyte you meant Sapphire then you should know it now has voltage control enabled through the latest TRIXX software.

By Gigabyte I meant Gigabyte (OP link in first post). The Sapphire is clearly the best choice for the money but if you cant find one, the second best will be the Asus.