Radeon 9700 Pro UT2003 Demo Benches

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
This is at: (retail Radeon 9700 Not overclocked)

1280x1024x32
Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 8x
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP
All Settings on "Quality"

All of the benches ran smooth as glass, and man...Looked Beautiful!

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1913 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9700 Series (6166)

dm-asbestos?game

15.455854 / 78.600281 / 214.140961 fps
Score = 78.606529

dm-antalus?game

8.878158 / 54.150436 / 580.102966 fps
Score = 54.148064

ctf-citadel?game

5.944124 / 58.890106 / 303.886047 fps
Score = 58.918598

dm-asbestos?spectatoronly

22.870199 / 48.408894 / 95.505081 fps
Score = 48.498619

dm-antalus?spectatoronly

5.508416 / 33.012798 / 66.882851 fps
Score = 33.031349

ctf-citadel?spectatoronly

6.617315 / 31.001795 / 86.008827 fps
Score = 31.027290

This is at:

1024x768x32
Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 8x
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2002-09-13_17.31]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1913 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9700 Series (6166)

dm-asbestos?game

21.651304 / 116.354294 / 385.798615 fps
Score = 116.397591

dm-antalus?game

9.920064 / 79.728706 / 528.360779 fps
Score = 79.725502

ctf-citadel?game

9.681520 / 80.317657 / 400.857208 fps
Score = 80.368828

br-anubis?spectatoronly

15.252770 / 54.763157 / 104.241127 fps
Score = 54.769073

dm-antalus?spectatoronly

8.754687 / 39.012016 / 69.533821 fps
Score = 39.030178

ctf-citadel?spectatoronly

15.066862 / 43.041050 / 94.421532 fps
Score = 43.087757



 
F

Furor

Golden Member
Mar 31, 2001
1,895
0
0
It would be a lot easier to understand if you ran the Benchmark.exe file in the /UT2003/System folder..you'll see it's the right thing if it lets you choose the resolution.

btw, how come you never left me any heatware after our trade?
 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
It would be a lot easier to understand if you ran the Benchmark.exe file in the /UT2003/System folder..you'll see it's the right thing if it lets you choose the resolution.
Click to expand...
I found that the Benchmark.exe does not play all 3 demos, and does not allow me to run 1280x1024. Anyway.. here are a couple from Benchmark.exe: I will try to fix the above benches to be easier to read.

Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 8x
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP
All Settings on "Quality"

800x600
FlyBy: 144.445755
BotMatch: 62.182205 FPS

1024x768
FlyBy: 98.088488
BotMatch: 55.825455 FPS
btw, how come you never left me any heatware after our trade?
Click to expand...
:eek: Sorry, I am behind on yours and quite a few others....
 
F

Furor

Golden Member
Mar 31, 2001
1,895
0
0
btw, how come you never left me any heatware after our trade?
Click to expand...
:eek: Sorry, I am behind on yours and quite a few others....
Click to expand...

it's alright, you can see I left feedback here, and you can leave me feedback easily by clicking here

Those scores are damn good..about the same i'm getting without ANY AA or AF..let alone yours at 4x AA and 8x AF..damn..can you take some high res pictures in a good area? I can host them if you want.
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
hu those all see kinda slow compared to what i got:

Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 16x quality
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960

flyby 88.7
botmatch 44.3


athlon xp@1.6ghz
abit kr7 raid
512mb ram
win xp home
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
of course i am, i didnt buy a 400$ grapics card to play in ugly mode ;)

but it shouldnt matter anyway as it says in the readme that the benches are always run at max settings. i am curious as to what the issue is, i checked your 3dmark scores and you did notably beter than me so i would be hard pressed to say you have something misconfigured http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4471814. maybe just the diffrence between an amd and an intel in the game, granted thats realy gonnna burn a lot of intel zellots it its true. :D


btw i just reran it and got 82.1/43.9. im almost positive the scores i posted above are right for what it ran last night but i cant say i am infoulable and might have made a mistake. the scores i posted right there hower i can assure you were posted directly from the results and are at all the same settings i mentioned above.
 
E

Entropy007

Senior member
Apr 18, 2000
252
0
0
I don't know what it is
I ran it again at your settings and I got 69 and 45 FPS respectively.
So for some reason you're wasting me on the flybys.
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
maybe its your overclocked fsb that is giveing the game a fit? i know its a long shot but maybe the card just chokes on the uped agp bus. if that is not it i am truely looking forward to more peoples numbers to help figure this out.
 
E

Entropy007

Senior member
Apr 18, 2000
252
0
0
the agp and pci are running at 66/33 respectively. It doesn't really matter to me since the demo plays very smoothly and looks great.

Wow it took me almost 2.5 years to reach 200 posts
 
E

Entropy007

Senior member
Apr 18, 2000
252
0
0
Hey Thesnowman I might have figured it out. Do you have performance or quality selected for Anisotropic filtering?

Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 16x (Quality)
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960
FlyBy: 66.811630 FPS
BotMatch: 43.214 FPS

Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 16x (Performance)
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960
FlyBy: 85.37 FPS
BotMatch: 51.86 FPS


Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 8x (performance)
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960
FlyBy: 88.6 FPS
BotMatch: 53.94 FPS


Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 8x (Quality)
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960
FlyBy: 69 FPS
BotMatch: 45 FPS


Looks like the leading edge of Tropical Storm Hanna (or depression) has come to Atlanta


 
K

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
I posted this in the ti4200 thread but in case you don't check that:

AthlonXP 1600+ (1.4GHz)
Shuttle AK31A (KT266A) mobo
512MB Crucial PC2100
Gainward GF4 Ti4200 64MB (250/500) [Detonator 30.82 WHQL Certified]
WindowsXP Professional w/Servce Pack 1

-8 sample aniso
-"4xS" AA
-Mipmap detail "Best image quality"

1600x1200
Flyby: 15.1
Botmatch: 9.4

And I am in ATL also entropy.
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
qualty, and 16x too, i messed up and wrote 8x but i will correct it for the sake of good info.
 
E

Entropy007

Senior member
Apr 18, 2000
252
0
0
Well klah, I hope you like rain. Of course it has been a long time since it rained so it may actually be kind of nice.

TheSnowman ; Is it possible that since the benchmark program adjust settings based on the system that we are running different benchmarks?

Feeder bands will continue to spread across north and central Georgia this afternoon and evening. Some of these feeder bands will produce rainfall amounts of 1 to 2 inches. The heaviest rain is expected to move across north and central Georgia overnight as the center of Tropical Depression Hanna moves across north Georgia. The heaviest rain will likely remain along and south of the track of Hanna... generally south of a line from Carrollton... to Blue Ridge ... Where additional rainfall amounts of 2 to 4 inches are possible.
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
i realy dont think so, for the botmatch ones yes, we are running diffrent benchs as cpu speed detemains the actions taken by the bots. however from what i understand the videocard alone determines the grapics settings an anything gefroce/radeon and up should run at the same game settings. it all seems prety cut an dry to me anyway after reading the notes in the readme.

just ran it again and got:

Anti-Aliasing: 4x
Anisotropic Filtering: 16x quality
Texture/Mipmap Quality..Maxed
Vertical Sync: AP
Trueform: AP

1280x960

flyby:93.5
botmatch 46.6


note i got that after rebooting from reinstalling the 2.3's over the top of the 2.3s i was currently running. i did that because at the advice of others i aplied the ati d3d patch for the 2.2 drivers to the 2.3 drivers and benched ut to get like 70 in the flyby and 35 in the botmatch. did you by chance install the d3d patch over the 2.3 drivers?
 
E

Entropy007

Senior member
Apr 18, 2000
252
0
0
I did apply the patch. I'll reinstall the 2.3 and check

After reinstalling the 2.3's I get exactly the same as before
 
D

Dug

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2000
3,469
6
81
They weren't kidding when they said to use the 3xxx drivers.
The 40.41 drivers make all the colors look like crap.
Huge difference when going back to the older drivers.

It definately runs slower, but at least everything doesn't have that dull look to it.

Nice scores on the 9700 btw
 
mechBgon

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
I ran the benchie at 640 x 480 on my 8Mb TNT2-Vanta, with a 1GHz Duron doing the dirty work. Results were: 16fps in flyby and 13fps in botmatch. The game IS playable at 640 x 480 with the settings cranked down most of the way. I ended up sticking my GF2 GTS-V back in, however, and it certainly is far smoother now.

If you really want to get some laughs, host a LAN deathmatch and set minimum players to 64. Seeing 63 bots slug it out in DM is quite a sight! :Q It brought my Duron to a crawl.
 
Dulanic

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,949
569
136
If your flybys are low you prob have vsync on... thats what happened to me the first time, my bots was about the same as everyone else, but my flybys were much lower.
 
kylebisme

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
thats odd because i always run with vsync on but the benchmark always automaticly runs without vsync.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom