- Jun 5, 2003
- 1,465
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: shady06
i would say 6800U but who cares, they arent going to be clocked the same
what would be faster: a 9800XT clocked @ 5950 speeds or a 5950
Originally posted by: videoclone
Originally posted by: shady06
i would say 6800U but who cares, they arent going to be clocked the same
what would be faster: a 9800XT clocked @ 5950 speeds or a 5950
Well a 9800 and 5950 are not the same 8 pipelines 4 Vertex Shaders VS 4 pipleines 3 shaders
The X800XT and the 6800 both have 16 pipeline and 6 vertex shaders they are the same but clocked leap frogs apart! thats why i think it would be very interesting to see what Core would be better!
I hope some reviews test this in time!
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: videoclone
Originally posted by: shady06
i would say 6800U but who cares, they arent going to be clocked the same
what would be faster: a 9800XT clocked @ 5950 speeds or a 5950
Well a 9800 and 5950 are not the same 8 pipelines 4 Vertex Shaders VS 4 pipleines 3 shaders
The X800XT and the 6800 both have 16 pipeline and 6 vertex shaders they are the same but clocked leap frogs apart! thats why i think it would be very interesting to see what Core would be better!
I hope some reviews test this in time!
Why don't you buy both and test it for us. I'm sure everyone is dying to know. :roll:
Originally posted by: Dman877
This is like asking which is faster, an amd at 2 ghz or a P4 at 2 ghz... useless.
Originally posted by: Sid59
Originally posted by: Dman877
This is like asking which is faster, an amd at 2 ghz or a P4 at 2 ghz... useless.
actaully the AMD is. but we almost get your point.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Why don't you buy both and test it for us. I'm sure everyone is dying to know. :roll:
Originally posted by: videoclone
Anyone who voted X800XT at 400Mhz beating the 6800 Are just showing how stupid they are! ..
Just like those people who think a P4 Running at 2Ghz beats and AMD running at 2Ghz idiots who know nothing !
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Sid59
Originally posted by: Dman877
This is like asking which is faster, an amd at 2 ghz or a P4 at 2 ghz... useless.
actaully the AMD is. but we almost get your point.
That's what he's getting at: just because one company is faster at a given clock speed doesn't mean that their technology is necessarily better...just different ideologies.
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
Originally posted by: videoclone
Anyone who voted X800XT at 400Mhz beating the 6800 Are just showing how stupid they are! ..
Just like those people who think a P4 Running at 2Ghz beats and AMD running at 2Ghz idiots who know nothing !
Or they did it to rebel against the obvious fanboyism at work here...
This is like asking which is faster, an amd at 2 ghz or a P4 at 2 ghz... useless.
Actually, it does. This means you use less RAW power, meaning you are being a more intelligent engineer - well, that's the way I see it.That's what he's getting at: just because one company is faster at a given clock speed doesn't mean that their technology is necessarily better...just different ideologies.
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
what a dumbass post.. what's the next poll?
Radeon 800Pro 12 pipes VS 6800GT 12 pipes
who do u think would win if both these cards had the same # of pipes?
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
what a dumbass post.. what's the next poll?
Radeon 800Pro 12 pipes VS 6800GT 12 pipes
who do u think would win if both these cards had the same # of pipes?
lol.
WHICH WOULD WIN IF THESE TWO CARDS WERE IDENTICAL IN EVERY WAY??