Racy Calvin Klein Billboard Ad Stirs Controversy In NYC

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Too sexy or sign o' the times?

Billboard pic at link

Jun 15, 2009 11:25 am US/Eastern
Sexy Calvin Klein Ad Stirs Controversy In NYC

Billboard Features Four Partially Clothed Models In Sexually Suggestive Positions

Watchdog: Racy 'Threesome' Ad Act Of Desperate Designer Who Is No Longer Relevant In Fashion Community

It's hard to offend a New Yorker with an advertisement, but that's not to say that people won't keep trying.

The latest racy billboard hoping to shock people is in SoHo, and it features four partially clothed models in a sexually suggestive situation.

A billboard is supposed to catch your eye, and in this instance, consider that mission accomplished.

"It's just completely out there," one mother said. "I don't want the kids to see it."

"I think it's telling people it's okay to do that, and it's kind of gross," Aleasha Stephens, a tourist from Houston, says.

Photography teacher Laura Friesen snapped a photo of it, and plans to discuss it with her students in Denver.

"I took a photo to show it's shocking, but it can also be on a billboard in NY, and this is what can be in New York," Friesen told CBS station WCBS-TV in New York City.

The billboard uses sex to sell Calvin Klein jeans, and it is not the first time ? and that's why some people just shrug it off.

"I don't care about sexual ads," Maria Mojena, a Boston resident visiting New York City, said. "They don't offend me or provoke me in any way."

Barbara Lippert is Ad Critic for Adweek Media Magazine, and said the billboard seems like a desperate act for Calvin Klein.

"I think he really wants to get back into the ballpark because he doesn't seem relevant anymore," Lippert said.

"The worst thing would be to get no attention at all. So if you need to throw in another two or three dudes to get that attention so people will say, 'what' and really give it a second look, he'll do that."

"Any publicity is good publicity, and people are talking about it, and that's all he wants," Stephens said.

Asked about the message in the ad, a Calvin Klein spokesman said the "intention was to create a very sexy campaign that speaks to our targeted demographic."
http://cbs3.com/topstories/rac...llboard.2.1044919.html

 

rivan

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2003
9,677
3
81
Shrug.

I don't think it's in significantly worse taste than many other advertisements.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,101
2
56
Inappropriate for such a general audience. Completely appropriate for certain audiences.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Nik
Inappropriate for such a general audience. Completely appropriate for certain audiences.

I think they said that about the CK Marky Mark ad too. I think this is just CK doing what CK does - pushing the envelope.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
46
91
Seems appropriate in a targeted magazine ad... not so much for the general populous.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
oh lawdy lawdy lawd, what da world comin too? now people gon start thinkin bout sex? i swear, if it wudn't for no ad men dere wouldnt be no mo sex no how!


go back to texas.
 

puffff

Platinum Member
Jun 25, 2004
2,374
0
0
I walked by this last week. It definitely caught my attention. If it were on tv, I don't think it's worth making a fuss about, but on a highly visible billboard? I thought it was inappropriate.
 

Taejin

Moderator<br>Love & Relationships
Aug 29, 2004
3,270
0
0
is that really sexy? I think it goes from sexy into senseless debauchery.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Dumac
A bit inappropriate as a billboard.

Fine in a magazine, though.

Do you think the Marky Mark ad was risque for a billboard in Times Square in 1992?
 

Dumac

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,391
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Dumac
A bit inappropriate as a billboard.

Fine in a magazine, though.

Do you think the Marky Mark ad was risque for a billboard in Times Square in 1992?

Is that the one shown in the article?

If so, not really, but I can see how some find it inappropriate for a general audience.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Dumac
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Dumac
A bit inappropriate as a billboard.

Fine in a magazine, though.

Do you think the Marky Mark ad was risque for a billboard in Times Square in 1992?

Is that the one shown in the article?

If so, not really, but I can see how some find it inappropriate for a general audience.

yes, it is. i believe it caused a stir in '92 like this one is today.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
if you truly want to be offended, head to calvinkleinjeans.com. My god, there's a VIDEO featuring even more salacious acts of moral turpitude and you don't even need a credit card or some sort of certification to see it! Think of the children!